Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forward-merge branch-23.12 to branch-24.02 #1274

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023
Merged

Conversation

GPUtester
Copy link
Contributor

Forward-merge triggered by push to branch-23.12 that creates a PR to keep branch-24.02 up-to-date. If this PR is unable to be immediately merged due to conflicts, it will remain open for the team to manually merge.

galipremsagar and others added 2 commits November 13, 2023 16:24
…ns (#1270)

Currently dask versions are pinned as part of every release cycle and then unpinned for the next development cycle across all of RAPIDS. This introduces a great deal of churn. To centralize the dependency, we have created a metapackage to manage the required dask version and this PR introduces that metapackage as a dependency of dask-cuda.

xref: rapidsai/cudf#14364

Authors:
  - GALI PREM SAGAR (https://github.com/galipremsagar)

Approvers:
  - Peter Andreas Entschev (https://github.com/pentschev)
  - Jake Awe (https://github.com/AyodeAwe)

URL: #1270
Without this extra spec, consumers of dask-cuda nightlies won't know that dask-cuda nightlies want to use nightlies of rapids-dask-dependency.

Authors:
  - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr)

Approvers:
  - Jake Awe (https://github.com/AyodeAwe)

URL: #1273
@GPUtester GPUtester requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2023 16:54
@GPUtester GPUtester merged commit 54e760f into branch-24.02 Nov 14, 2023
35 checks passed
@GPUtester
Copy link
Contributor Author

SUCCESS - forward-merge complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci conda conda issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants