Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated iin #310

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024
Merged

updated iin #310

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

ankitdas13
Copy link
Contributor

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.12%. Comparing base (779d137) to head (a2014fc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #310   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     84.12%   84.12%           
- Complexity      333      334    +1     
=========================================
  Files            64       64           
  Lines           762      762           
  Branches         34       34           
=========================================
  Hits            641      641           
  Misses           95       95           
  Partials         26       26           
Flag Coverage Δ
tests 84.12% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ankitdas13 ankitdas13 requested a review from rohitcbr March 26, 2024 10:21
@ankitdas13 ankitdas13 requested a review from rohitcbr April 1, 2024 05:01
@ankitdas13 ankitdas13 added the TestingNotRequired TestingNotRequired label for BVT label Apr 1, 2024
@ankitdas13 ankitdas13 merged commit 555f2da into master Apr 1, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
TestingNotRequired TestingNotRequired label for BVT
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants