-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update mock custom entitlement to take in users and params #1013
update mock custom entitlement to take in users and params #1013
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes a contract renaming from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files ignored due to path filters (112)
Files selected for processing (3)
Additional comments not posted (16)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
contracts/test/mocks/MockCustomEntitlement.sol (1)
28-33
: Suggest adding explanatory comment.The function
isEntitled
always returnstrue
and does not use its parameters. Consider adding a comment to clarify this behavior for future maintainers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
core/contracts/base/channels.go (1)
Line range hint
60-67
: General Observations on Code Quality and MaintainabilityOverall, the code is well-structured and follows the conventions for Ethereum contract bindings in Go. The use of detailed comments and clear structuring helps maintainability. However, the complexity of the ABI and the extensive use of inline error handling could be streamlined to enhance readability and manageability.
No description provided.