-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: multipart support #164
feat: multipart support #164
Conversation
@robertleeplummerjr I tested this using the Antarctica.geojson file and it seems to render "good enough" for now. A strange overlap issue could be addressed down the road, when someones use case requires it. Can be merged. I will be depending on this PR branch till then. Also willing to take responsibility for managing this repo if you find yourself too busy. Add me as a contributor if you'd like a teammate in this. (Still highly undereducated in the GL space, but managing repos/package releases is pretty straightforward) |
cde4a6d
to
a471eec
Compare
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Thats awesome, thanks! Did you also test out Multi-Linestrings? |
@trafficonese I did not. I only needed multipolygon for my use case. |
a471eec
to
2530506
Compare
Co-authored-by: Kanahiro Iguchi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Liam O'flynn <[email protected]>
2530506
to
6dd3573
Compare
@robertleeplummerjr this should be ready to merge and all related issues/pr's can be closed. Just a reminder there are some stragler issues to close from my previous PR, see this comment Finally, publishing the newest release on Github should close #154 |
@robert-lore @robertleeplummerjr thank you for the merge. Do you plan to make a release and close the resolved issues? I can help you manage this repo if you find yourself without time. |
I'm installing it on my mac and was having trouble. |
@robert-lore Were they from my contributions or your machine? |
@charlieforward9 does your fix support combination of Polygon and MultiPolygon on a FeatureCollection? 🙇 |
Just removed canvas, which was causing my install issue, and published. |
Worth taking a look and letting me know. I just took the contributions of @quorth0n and @Kanahiro and applied them to the latest branch, so please let me know if you have any issues. |
@robert-lore Great, thank you! I am having trouble running my test suite because of an improperly defined |
@arvii , yes it works also for a combination of polygons and multipolygons. |
Hi @trafficonese Thank you so much for checking also. Could you please send me the sample data you tested? I want to verify if my format is correct. I tested it with a combination of Polygon and MultiPolygon in a GeoJSON FeatureCollection, but only the Polygon rendered. When I tested a GeoJSON Feature with a single MultiPolygon, it rendered correctly. Thank you so much! 🙇 |
@arvii It's a very simple Featurecollection:
|
Tried to acknowledge the contributions of the previous contributors to for getting multipart geometries working. Closes #42 and #66 and #158
Co-authored-by: Kanahiro Iguchi [email protected] @Kanahiro
Co-authored-by: Liam O'flynn [email protected] @quorth0n
Includes Prettier formatting