-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature] Interfaces remapping for controllers #1667
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[Feature] Interfaces remapping for controllers #1667
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1667 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.62% 87.79% +0.16%
==========================================
Files 120 121 +1
Lines 12217 12327 +110
Branches 1093 1115 +22
==========================================
+ Hits 10705 10822 +117
+ Misses 1123 1109 -14
- Partials 389 396 +7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
This pull request is in conflict. Could you fix it @saikishor? |
This pull request is in conflict. Could you fix it @saikishor? |
a3ef839
to
0d6f733
Compare
This pull request is in conflict. Could you fix it @saikishor? |
0d6f733
to
836de9a
Compare
This PR aims to add a new features to the controllers so that they will be able to remap interfaces, this would be interesting to have as for interfaces such as
effort
the hardware could expose more meaningful interfaces such astorque
,force
orcurrent
and it would get the logic of the controller more complicated if they need to support multiple type of interfaces. Instead the users should be able to remap as simply by defining the remapping definition under the controller's parametersThe controller prints some more explicit log when configuring the controller, so that the user are clear on what interfaces are being remapped
Related to ros-controls/roadmap#61