-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 333
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix RealtimeBox API changes #1385
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR swaps out 2 controllers' main input to use the stamped version without any deprecation. There is very little actual alignment with the realtime_tools API that I can see. Would it be possible to separate these onto 2 PRs?
No, that is not true: There is no change! I was just puzzled by this alias and renamed it: |
Yes please and I stand corrected 🫡 |
This pull request is in conflict. Could you fix it @christophfroehlich? |
Co-authored-by: Christoph Fröhlich <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you!
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1385 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.56% 83.57% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 122 122
Lines 10992 10993 +1
Branches 937 936 -1
==========================================
+ Hits 9185 9187 +2
Misses 1493 1493
+ Partials 314 313 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious about the effect of the try_get
we might have
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
May be it is better to set the last_command_msg_
to empty in the configure. Same goes for the test changes
We don't use try_get in the tests? |
Sure it is not needed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks spot on!
Thanks a lot for fixing things :)
So we don't need to backport this after the branch-off of realtime_tools right? |
ros-controls/realtime_tools#200