More config options for HDFS storage (e.g. Kerberos) #57
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: fabricebaranski <[email protected]>
juhoautio-rovio
commented
Sep 10, 2024
Comment on lines
+106
to
+108
| this.hdfsCoreSitePath = options.getOrDefault(ConfKeys.DEEP_STORAGE_HDFS_CORE_SITE_PATH, null); | ||
| this.hdfsHdfsSitePath = options.getOrDefault(ConfKeys.DEEP_STORAGE_HDFS_HDFS_SITE_PATH, null); | ||
| this.hdfsDefaultFS = options.getOrDefault(ConfKeys.DEEP_STORAGE_HDFS_DEFAULT_FS, null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These 3 conf options are left hidden – no mention in README.
- DEEP_STORAGE_HDFS_DEFAULT_FS has a "hidden" implementation
- X_SITE_PATHs are not implemented (exception is thrown if these are set).
This is how it was in fabricebaranski@9c6eb40. We can keep them as a starting point for possible implementation in the future.
|
👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds to the implementation that already exists, and even more so marks #47 resolved.
This code was extracted from fabricebaranski@9c6eb40, as agreed with the author. Thank you for the contribution!