-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HashMap
/HashSet
: forward fold
implementations of iterators
#117756
Conversation
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
`HashMap`/`HashSet`: forward `fold` implementations of iterators Use [rust-lang/hasbrown#480](rust-lang/hashbrown#480) in `std`
Maybe we should use the patched |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Finished benchmarking commit (83a6feb): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 663.537s -> 660.887s (-0.40%) |
I can't update
Shouldn't this be accepted though ? Maybe the tool isn't smart enough. |
These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ahash 0.8.4 pulling zerocopy* (which pulls proc-macro2, syn, quote) in small commit tkaitchuck/aHash@a74829b, and now this is included into hashbrown -> stdlib as dependency, not nice :-( |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #118546) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Nope, ahash not used in stdlib. |
Rebased on |
@bors r+ |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (1828461): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 665.65s -> 665.294s (-0.05%) |
Use rust-lang/hasbrown#480 in
std
Note: this needs a version bump of hashbrown before merging