Rollup of 7 pull requests #40215
Closed
Rollup of 7 pull requests #40215
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Replace it with ConstUsize instead, which is more appropriate; we are not using the rest of the TypedConstVal anyway
… instead of silently ignoring a result. `fmt::Write for String` never returns `Err`, so implementations of `Display` (or other traits of that family) never should either. Fixes rust-lang#40103
This commit adds support to rustbuild for compiling Cargo as part of the release process. Previously rustbuild would simply download a Cargo snapshot and repackage it. With this change we should be able to turn off artifacts from the rust-lang/cargo repository and purely rely on the artifacts Cargo produces here. The infrastructure added here is intended to be extensible to other components, such as the RLS. It won't exactly be a one-line addition, but the addition of Cargo didn't require too much hooplah anyway. The process for release Cargo will now look like: * The rust-lang/rust repository has a Cargo submodule which is used to build a Cargo to pair with the rust-lang/rust release * Periodically we'll update the cargo submodule as necessary on rust-lang/rust's master branch * When branching beta we'll create a new branch of Cargo (as we do today), and the first commit to the beta branch will be to update the Cargo submodule to this exact revision. * When branching stable, we'll ensure that the Cargo submodule is updated and then make a stable release. Backports to Cargo will look like: * Send a PR to cargo's master branch * Send a PR to cargo's release branch (e.g. rust-1.16.0) * Send a PR to rust-lang/rust's beta branch updating the submodule * Eventually send a PR to rust-lang/rust's master branch updating the submodule For reference, the process to add a new component to the rust-lang/rust release would look like: * Add `$foo` as a submodule in `src/tools` * Add a `tool-$foo` step which compiles `$foo` with the specified compiler, likely mirroring what Cargo does. * Add a `dist-$foo` step which uses `src/tools/$foo` and the `tool-$foo` output to create a rust-installer package for `$foo` likely mirroring what Cargo does. * Update the `dist-extended` step with a new dependency on `dist-$foo` * Update `src/tools/build-manifest` for the new component.
Tracking issue: rust-lang#40180 This calling convention can be used for definining interrupt handlers on 32-bit and 64-bit x86 targets. The compiler then uses `iret` instead of `ret` for returning and ensures that all registers are restored to their original values. Usage: ``` extern "x86-interrupt" fn handler(stack_frame: &ExceptionStackFrame) {…} ``` for interrupts and exceptions without error code and ``` extern "x86-interrupt" fn page_fault_handler(stack_frame: &ExceptionStackFrame, error_code: u64) {…} ``` for exceptions that push an error code (e.g., page faults or general protection faults). The programmer must ensure that the correct version is used for each interrupt. For more details see the [LLVM PR][1] and the corresponding [proposal][2]. [1]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15567 [2]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-September/045171.html
…ention, r=nagisa
Add support for the x86-interrupt calling convention
This calling convention can be used for definining interrupt handlers on 32-bit and 64-bit x86 targets. The compiler then uses `iret` instead of `ret` for returning and ensures that all registers are restored to their
original values.
Usage:
```rust
extern "x86-interrupt" fn handler(stack_frame: &ExceptionStackFrame) {…}
```
for interrupts and exceptions without error code and
```rust
extern "x86-interrupt" fn handler_with_err_code(stack_frame: &ExceptionStackFrame,
error_code: u64) {…}
```
for exceptions that push an error code (e.g., page faults or general protection faults). The programmer must ensure that the correct version is used for each interrupt.
For more details see the [LLVM PR][1] and the corresponding [proposal][2].
[1]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15567
[2]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-September/045171.html
It is also possible to implement interrupt handlers on x86 through [naked functions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1201-naked-fns.md). In fact, almost all existing Rust OS projects for x86 use naked functions for this, including [Redox](https://github.com/redox-os/kernel/blob/b9793deb59c7650f0805dea96adb6b773ad99336/arch/x86_64/src/lib.rs#L109-L147), [IntermezzOS](https://github.com/intermezzOS/kernel/blob/f959cc18c78b1ba153f3ff7039d9ecc07f397628/interrupts/src/lib.rs#L28-L72), and [blog_os](https://github.com/phil-opp/blog_os/blob/844d739379ffdea6a7ede88365ec6e21a725bbf5/src/interrupts/mod.rs#L49-L64). So support for the `x86-interrupt` calling convention isn't absolutely needed.
However, it has a number of benefits to naked functions:
- **No inline assembly needed**: [Inline assembly](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/inline-assembly.html) is highly unstable and dangerous. It's pretty easy to mess things up. Also, it uses an arcane syntax and requires that the programmer knows x86 assembly.
- **Higher performance**: A naked wrapper function always saves _all_ registers before calling the Rust function. This isn't needed for a compiler supported calling convention, since the compiler knows which registers are clobbered by the interrupt handler. Thus, only these registers need to be saved and restored.
- **Safer interfaces**: We can write a `set_handler` function that takes a `extern "x86-interrupt" fn(&ExceptionStackFrame)` and the compiler ensures that we always use the right function type for all handler functions. This isn't possible with the `#[naked]` attribute.
- **More convenient**: Instead of writing [tons of assembly boilerplate](https://github.com/redox-os/kernel/blob/b9793deb59c7650f0805dea96adb6b773ad99336/arch/x86_64/src/lib.rs#L109-L147) and desperately trying to improve things [through macros](https://github.com/phil-opp/blog_os/blob/844d739379ffdea6a7ede88365ec6e21a725bbf5/src/interrupts/mod.rs#L17-L92), we can just write [code like this](https://github.com/phil-opp/blog_os/blob/e6a61f9507a4c4fef6fb4e3474bc596391bc97d2/src/interrupts/mod.rs#L85-L89).
- **Naked functions are unreliable**: It is allowed to use Rust code inside a naked function, which sometimes works and sometimes not. For example, [calling a function](https://github.com/redox-os/kernel/blob/b9793deb59c7650f0805dea96adb6b773ad99336/arch/x86_64/src/lib.rs#L132) through Rust code seems to work fine without function prologue, but [code declaring a variable](https://is.gd/NQYXqE) silently adds a prologue even though the function is naked (look at the generated assembly, there is a `movl` instruction before the `nop`).
**Edit**: See the [tracking issue](rust-lang#40180) for an updated list of issues.
Unfortunately, the implementation of the `x86-interrupt` calling convention in LLVM has some issues that make it unsuitable for 64-bit kernels at the moment:
- LLVM always tries to backup the `xmm` registers on 64-bit platforms even if the target doesn't support SSE. This leads to invalid opcode exceptions whenever an interrupt handler is invoked. I submitted a fix to LLVM in [D29959](https://reviews.llvm.org/D29959). The fix is really small (<10 lines), so maybe we could backport it to [Rust's LLVM fork](https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm)?. **Edit**: The fix was merged to LLVM trunk in [rL295347](https://reviews.llvm.org/rL295347). Backported in rust-lang/llvm#63.
- On targets with SSE support, LLVM uses the `movaps` instruction for saving the `xmm` registers, which requires an alignment of 16. For handlers with error codes, however, the stack alignment is only 8, so a alignment exception occurs. This issue is tracked in [bug 26413](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26413). ~~Unfortunately, I don't know enough about LLVM to fix this.~~ **Edit**: Fix submitted in [D30049](https://reviews.llvm.org/D30049).
This PR adds experimental support for this calling convention under the `abi_x86_interrupt` feature gate. The implementation is very similar to rust-lang#38465 and was surprisingly simple :).
There is no accepted RFC for this change. In fact, the [RFC for interrupt calling convention](rust-lang/rfcs#1275) from 2015 was closed in favor of naked functions. However, the reactions to the recent [PR](rust-lang#38465) for a MSP430 interrupt calling convention were [in favor of experimental interrupt ABIs](rust-lang#38465 (comment)).
- [x] Add compile-fail tests for the feature gate.
- [x] Create tracking issue for the `abi_x86_interrupt` feature (and link it in code). **Edit**: Tracking issue: rust-lang#40180
- [x] Backport [rL295347](https://reviews.llvm.org/rL295347) to Rust's LLVM fork. **Edit**: Done in rust-lang/llvm#63
@tari @steveklabnik @jackpot51 @ticki @hawkw @thepowersgang, you might be interested in this.
rustbuild: Add support for compiling Cargo This commit adds support to rustbuild for compiling Cargo as part of the release process. Previously rustbuild would simply download a Cargo snapshot and repackage it. With this change we should be able to turn off artifacts from the rust-lang/cargo repository and purely rely on the artifacts Cargo produces here. The infrastructure added here is intended to be extensible to other components, such as the RLS. It won't exactly be a one-line addition, but the addition of Cargo didn't require too much hooplah anyway. The process for release Cargo will now look like: * The rust-lang/rust repository has a Cargo submodule which is used to build a Cargo to pair with the rust-lang/rust release * Periodically we'll update the cargo submodule as necessary on rust-lang/rust's master branch * When branching beta we'll create a new branch of Cargo (as we do today), and the first commit to the beta branch will be to update the Cargo submodule to this exact revision. * When branching stable, we'll ensure that the Cargo submodule is updated and then make a stable release. Backports to Cargo will look like: * Send a PR to cargo's master branch * Send a PR to cargo's release branch (e.g. rust-1.16.0) * Send a PR to rust-lang/rust's beta branch updating the submodule * Eventually send a PR to rust-lang/rust's master branch updating the submodule For reference, the process to add a new component to the rust-lang/rust release would look like: * Add `$foo` as a submodule in `src/tools` * Add a `tool-$foo` step which compiles `$foo` with the specified compiler, likely mirroring what Cargo does. * Add a `dist-$foo` step which uses `src/tools/$foo` and the `tool-$foo` output to create a rust-installer package for `$foo` likely mirroring what Cargo does. * Update the `dist-extended` step with a new dependency on `dist-$foo` * Update `src/tools/build-manifest` for the new component.
[MIR] Rvalue::ty infallible + remove TypedConstVal Feel free to r+ whenever there aren't any big bit-rot sensitive PRs in the queue. r? @eddyb
…ter, r=alexcrichton Panic on errors in `format!` or `<T: Display>::to_string` … instead of silently ignoring a result. `fmt::Write for String` never returns `Err`, so implementations of `Display` (or other traits of that family) never should either. Fixes rust-lang#40103
Implement function-like procedural macros ( `#[proc_macro]`) Adds the `#[proc_macro]` attribute, which expects bare functions of the kind `fn(TokenStream) -> TokenStream`, which can be invoked like `my_macro!()`. cc rust-lang/rfcs#1913, rust-lang#38356 r? @jseyfried cc @nrc
…lexcrichton std::process for fuchsia: updated to latest liblaunchpad Our liblaunchpad changed a bit and so fuchsia's std::process impl needs to change a bit. @raphlinus
…tsakis Allow types passed to [] to coerce, like .index() Fixes rust-lang#40085 Basically steals the relevant part of [check_argument_types](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.15.1/src/librustc_typeck/check/mod.rs#L2653-L2672).
|
@bors r+ p=10 |
|
📌 Commit 6fd13a2 has been approved by |
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @brson (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
@bors r- |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
format!or<T: Display>::to_string#40117, Implement function-like procedural macros (#[proc_macro]) #40129, std::process for fuchsia: updated to latest liblaunchpad #40139, Allow types passed to [] to coerce, like .index() #40166