-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Speedtest (#48) #62
Conversation
Resolves: #48 Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Let's rename to |
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
|
||
let tail = stream_client.check_tail().await?; | ||
|
||
prepare_progress_bar.finish(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a method to remove the progress bar when its done? instead of taking it to 100%
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I had this in mind. With the interactivity thing, the lib is going to change so, let's see what happens there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no need for interactive thingy we talked about earlier, this seems ok
please also refactor into a separate module than |
Shikhar and I just talked about the opposite, going to completely make this interactive like you suggested in the first place. This is going to be |
you can reopen a fresh PR with the new approach! |
Resolves: #48