Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Speedtest (#48) #62

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

feat: Speedtest (#48) #62

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

vrongmeal
Copy link
Member

Resolves: #48

Resolves: #48

Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
@vrongmeal vrongmeal marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 13:40
@vrongmeal vrongmeal requested a review from a team as a code owner December 9, 2024 13:40
src/main.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@shikhar
Copy link
Member

shikhar commented Dec 10, 2024

Let's rename to speedtest which reflects what's going on better?

Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Rabber <[email protected]>
@vrongmeal vrongmeal changed the title feat: Pingtest (#48) feat: Speedtest (#48) Dec 10, 2024

let tail = stream_client.check_tail().await?;

prepare_progress_bar.finish();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there a method to remove the progress bar when its done? instead of taking it to 100%

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I had this in mind. With the interactivity thing, the lib is going to change so, let's see what happens there.

Copy link
Member

@infiniteregrets infiniteregrets left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need for interactive thingy we talked about earlier, this seems ok

@shikhar
Copy link
Member

shikhar commented Dec 10, 2024

please also refactor into a separate module than main.rs

@vrongmeal
Copy link
Member Author

no need for interactive thingy we talked about earlier, this seems ok

Shikhar and I just talked about the opposite, going to completely make this interactive like you suggested in the first place. This is going to be pingtest again :)

@shikhar
Copy link
Member

shikhar commented Dec 10, 2024

you can reopen a fresh PR with the new approach!

@shikhar shikhar closed this Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add ping command
3 participants