Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Normalize share and volume creation #86

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

xhernandez
Copy link
Collaborator

This patch normalizes the way shares and volumes are created. Till now, the volumes were created during installation of the backend, while shares were created during Samba installation. This caused some difficulties.

Now the volume is created just before creating the share which seems more logical. Some differences between backends have also been removed so that it's more uniform.

This need appeared as part of addressing the comments for #24.

@xhernandez xhernandez force-pushed the shares branch 2 times, most recently from 489a073 to eb8579d Compare February 22, 2024 10:52
@xhernandez xhernandez marked this pull request as ready for review February 22, 2024 11:24
@xhernandez xhernandez marked this pull request as draft February 22, 2024 15:19
@xhernandez xhernandez marked this pull request as ready for review February 22, 2024 15:52
Copy link
Collaborator

@anoopcs9 anoopcs9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm.

This patch normalizes the way shares and volumes are created. Till now,
the volumes were created during installation of the backend, while
shares were created during Samba installation. This caused some
difficulties.

Now the volume is created just before creating the share which seems
more logical. Some differences between backends have also been
removed so that it's more uniform.

Signed-off-by: Xavi Hernandez <[email protected]>
@anoopcs9 anoopcs9 merged commit aaf8bc5 into samba-in-kubernetes:main Feb 29, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants