Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support remote private storage by consistent use of substore #442

Closed
wants to merge 45 commits into from

Conversation

berombau
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #441, depends on (ome/ome-zarr-py#349)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.52%. Comparing base (b73f3a8) to head (7bb87ba).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 7bb87ba differs from pull request most recent head c120a4d. Consider uploading reports for the commit c120a4d to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #442      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.53%   92.52%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          43       39       -4     
  Lines        6003     5270     -733     
==========================================
- Hits         5555     4876     -679     
+ Misses        448      394      -54     
Files Coverage Δ
src/spatialdata/_core/spatialdata.py 94.43% <ø> (+2.21%) ⬆️
src/spatialdata/_io/io_raster.py 96.29% <100.00%> (ø)
src/spatialdata/_io/io_shapes.py 100.00% <100.00%> (+2.04%) ⬆️
src/spatialdata/_io/io_zarr.py 86.08% <66.66%> (-2.29%) ⬇️

... and 22 files with indirect coverage changes

@giovp
Copy link
Member

giovp commented Apr 23, 2024

for some reason it didn't rebase to main...

@giovp
Copy link
Member

giovp commented Jul 1, 2024

hi @berombau seems that there are a lot of conflicts, and still didnt' rebase correctly, not sure what to do but maybe worth to port over the changes to separate PR?

@berombau
Copy link
Contributor Author

berombau commented Jul 3, 2024

Yeah, I think I switched from merging to rebasing somewhere halfway 😅 I'll try to cherry-pick the changes on a new branch and do a cleaner PR.

@berombau berombau closed this Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for private remote object storage
4 participants