-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CCIP-4593 Create rmnproxy setRMN changeset #15674
Conversation
AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅ |
return nil | ||
} | ||
|
||
func SetRMNRemoteOnRMNProxy(e deployment.Environment, cfg SetRMNRemoteOnRMNProxyConfig) (deployment.ChangesetOutput, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Naming nit (not a big fan of it though) SetRMNRemoteOnRMNProxyChangeset
(getting really Java-ey 😢 )
multiSigs := make(map[uint64]*gethwrappers.ManyChainMultiSig) | ||
timelocks := make(map[uint64]common.Address) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We do this so often I feel like we should just have a helper like state.GetAllMCMSes()
and state.GetAllTimelocks()
😛
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ import ( | |||
) | |||
|
|||
func TestAddChainInbound(t *testing.T) { | |||
t.Skipf("Skipping test as it is running into timeout issues, move the test into integration in-memory tests") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you create a ticket for this? Its weird that its timing out, it takes 90s on my laptop
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -286,6 +286,8 @@ func CreateKeys(t *testing.T, | |||
} | |||
backend := chain.Client.(*Backend).Sim | |||
fundAddress(t, chain.DeployerKey, transmitters[evmChainID], assets.Ether(1000).ToInt(), backend) | |||
// in sim chains the send transactions are performed with 0x0 address as the sender |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have a link to the docs where this is mentioned?
Requires
Supports