Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CCIP-4593 Create rmnproxy setRMN changeset #15674

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024
Merged

CCIP-4593 Create rmnproxy setRMN changeset #15674

merged 12 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

AnieeG
Copy link
Contributor

@AnieeG AnieeG commented Dec 13, 2024

Requires

Supports

@AnieeG AnieeG requested review from a team as code owners December 13, 2024 01:55
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 13, 2024

AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

@AnieeG AnieeG requested review from a team as code owners December 13, 2024 02:23
@AnieeG AnieeG added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 13, 2024
return nil
}

func SetRMNRemoteOnRMNProxy(e deployment.Environment, cfg SetRMNRemoteOnRMNProxyConfig) (deployment.ChangesetOutput, error) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Naming nit (not a big fan of it though) SetRMNRemoteOnRMNProxyChangeset (getting really Java-ey 😢 )

Comment on lines +56 to +57
multiSigs := make(map[uint64]*gethwrappers.ManyChainMultiSig)
timelocks := make(map[uint64]common.Address)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do this so often I feel like we should just have a helper like state.GetAllMCMSes() and state.GetAllTimelocks() 😛

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ import (
)

func TestAddChainInbound(t *testing.T) {
t.Skipf("Skipping test as it is running into timeout issues, move the test into integration in-memory tests")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you create a ticket for this? Its weird that its timing out, it takes 90s on my laptop

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -286,6 +286,8 @@ func CreateKeys(t *testing.T,
}
backend := chain.Client.(*Backend).Sim
fundAddress(t, chain.DeployerKey, transmitters[evmChainID], assets.Ether(1000).ToInt(), backend)
// in sim chains the send transactions are performed with 0x0 address as the sender
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you have a link to the docs where this is mentioned?

Merged via the queue into develop with commit b22f1d7 Dec 13, 2024
190 checks passed
@AnieeG AnieeG deleted the update-rmnproxy branch December 13, 2024 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants