This GitHub Action runs tsc with reviewdog to improve code checking and review experience for TypeScript-based modules. 🐶
The action will first run tsc
, then passing the compiler's output to reviewdog for further processing. Reviewdog will then provide a GitHub check either with code annotations as displayed above or with a Pull Request review, depending on the action configuration.
For full documentation regarding reviewdog, its features and configuration options, please visit the reviewdog repository.
inputs:
github_token:
description: 'GITHUB_TOKEN'
default: '${{ github.token }}'
required: false
workdir:
description: |
Working directory relative to the root directory.
This is where the action will look for a
package.json which declares typescript as a dependency.
Default is `.`.
default: '.'
required: false
### Flags for reviewdog ###
level:
description: |
Report level for reviewdog [info,warning,error].
Default is `error`.
default: 'error'
required: false
reporter:
description: |
Reporter of reviewdog command [github-check,github-pr-check,github-pr-review].
Default is `github-pr-check`.
default: 'github-pr-check'
required: false
filter_mode:
description: |
Filtering mode for the reviewdog command [added,diff_context,file,nofilter].
Default is `added`.
default: 'added'
required: false
fail_on_error:
description: |
Exit code for reviewdog when errors are found [true,false].
Default is `false`.
default: 'false'
required: false
reviewdog_flags:
description: |
Additional reviewdog flags.
Default is ``.
default: ''
required: false
tool_name:
description: 'Tool name to use for reviewdog reporter'
default: 'tsc'
required: false
### Flags for tsc ###
tsc_flags:
description: |
Flags and args to pass to tsc.
Default is ``.
default: ''
required: false
This example shows how to configure the action to run on any event occurring on a Pull Request. Reviewdog will report tsc output messages as warnings by opening a code review on the Pull Request which triggered the workflow.
name: reviewdog
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
tsc:
name: runner / tsc
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
- uses: EPMatt/reviewdog-action-tsc@v1
with:
github_token: ${{ secrets.github_token }}
# Change reviewdog reporter if you need
# [github-pr-check,github-check,github-pr-review].
# More about reviewdog reporters at
# https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#reporters
reporter: github-pr-review
# Change reporter level if you need
# [info,warning,error].
# More about reviewdog reporter level at
# https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog#reporters
level: warning
To run the action on a TS module in a subfolder, you can change the path where the action will run with the workdir
input.
name: reviewdog
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
tsc:
name: runner / tsc
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
- uses: EPMatt/reviewdog-action-tsc@v1
with:
github_token: ${{ secrets.github_token }}
reporter: github-pr-review
level: warning
# The action will look for a package.json file with typescript
# declared as a dependency located in the "foo" subfolder.
workdir: foo
For more complex setups which require to run the action on multiple TS modules, run the action once for each single module, changing the workdir
and tsc_flags
inputs accordingly.
name: reviewdog
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
tsc:
name: runner / tsc
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
# Run action for the "submodule1" module
- uses: EPMatt/reviewdog-action-tsc@v1
with:
github_token: ${{ secrets.github_token }}
reporter: github-pr-review
level: warning
# The action will look for a package.json file with typescript
# declared as a dependency located in the "submodule1" subfolder.
workdir: submodule1
# Run action for the "submodule2" module
- uses: EPMatt/reviewdog-action-tsc@v1
with:
github_token: ${{ secrets.github_token }}
reporter: github-pr-review
level: warning
# The action will look for a package.json file with typescript
# declared as a dependency located in the "submodule2" subfolder.
workdir: submodule2
Try looking into the filter_mode
options explained here. TypeScript errors will sometimes appear in lines or files that weren't modified by the commit the workflow run is associated with, which instead get filtered with the default added
option.
Want to improve this action? Cool! 🚀 Please make sure to read the Contribution Guidelines prior submitting your work.
Any feedback, suggestion or improvement is highly appreciated!
If you want to show your appreciation and support maintenance and future development of this action, please consider making a small donation here. ☕
Moreover, if you like this project don't forget to leave a star on GitHub. Such a quick and zero-cost act will allow the action to get more visibility across the community, resulting in more people getting to know and using it. ⭐