Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle aperture photometry when images linked by WCS for advanced cases #2154
Handle aperture photometry when images linked by WCS for advanced cases #2154
Changes from all commits
6221785
dc827c8
9064835
5fc28a8
b421485
cca45af
444ef5c
3ab15d3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we'll eventually want to move this out of the subregions once reparenting is implemented (or perhaps remove entirely), but since its read-only, it doesn't hurt to have for now and could be useful for debugging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bmorris3 - does the rotation work remove some of this flexibility (by forbidding mixed linking)? If we might need to change or remove this, should we make it private in the meantime?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this method is useful with or without the rotation work. It's likely the case that it will be redundant with the link type attribute after image rotation is merged and WCS-linked in Imviz, but I think it's handy for debugging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think it should be public or private in the meantime?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see why it should be private. The information is so useful in the meantime that I think it should be public. If it comes a day we don't need it anymore, then we can deprecate it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that public is fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand your comment correctly, you're thinking about (near-)future-proofing this by looking up the current reference data's label? If so, I'll suggest that change here.