fix(es/helpers): Add addInitializer to field decorators

[phiresky]

Description:

At some point the spec text of ES decorators was changed to also have addInitializer for field decorators. This is already used e.g. in mobx. This simple change removes the special case that was present for field decorators and seems to fix the issue for me.

This change is backwards compatible since it only affects code that was broken before.

Related issue:

• Closes addInitializer missing on class field decorators #8525

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: c90388e

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[kdy1]

Please patch https://github.com/swc-project/swc/blob/da0ad79ed344141ececa839aa44dab51b65ed951/crates/swc_ecma_transforms_base/src/helpers/_apply_decs_2203_r.js, too

[phiresky]

Ah, I assumed that was auto copied somehow. I modified that file as well.

[kdy1]

swc-bump:

• swc_ecma_transforms_base

[swc-bot]

Automated review comment generated by auto-rebase script

[kdy1]

CI failed. Can you fix it? Possibly by removing some obsolete tests

[phiresky]

fixed the test case by now expecting function

[kdy1]

CI is still failing

[phiresky]

sorry, there's so many checks that it looks so green

[kdy1]

No worries. I made similar mistakes at the past. 😄 And thank you!

[swc-bot]

Automated review comment generated by auto-rebase script