feat(features): add Monthly View for meeting control (Work on Desktop devices) #2652
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Task linked: CU-86c0ezum9 Desktop monthly view |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant MidweekMeeting
participant MonthlyView
participant useMonthlyView
User->>MidweekMeeting: Click to switch view
MidweekMeeting->>MonthlyView: Render MonthlyView
MonthlyView->>useMonthlyView: Initialize state
useMonthlyView-->>MonthlyView: Return state and handlers
MonthlyView->>User: Display monthly meeting options
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 28
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_badge/index.types.tsx (1)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment for clarity.The
WeekBadgeTypedefinition looks good and aligns with the PR objective of adding a Monthly View for meeting control. The type is correctly exported and follows TypeScript naming conventions.Consider adding a brief comment above the type definition to explain its purpose within the Monthly View feature. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:
/** * Represents the properties for a WeekBadge component in the Monthly View. * The text property is used to display the week number or identifier. */ export type WeekBadgeType = { text: string; };src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_hoverbox/index.types.tsx (2)
4-8: LGTM: WeekHoverBoxType is well-defined, with a minor suggestion.The
WeekHoverBoxTypeis correctly defined and exported:
- It includes all necessary properties for a week hover box component.
- Using
ReactNodeforchildrenallows flexibility in the component's content.- The
typeproperty usingSourceAssignmentTypeensures type safety.Consider adding a comment or using a more specific type for the
weekproperty to clarify its expected format (e.g., ISO week number, date range, etc.). For example:export type WeekHoverBoxType = { children: ReactNode; type: SourceAssignmentType; week: string; // ISO week number (e.g., "2023-W01") or date range (e.g., "2023-01-01 to 2023-01-07") };
1-8: Overall, the file is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives.This new file introduces a type definition that supports the implementation of the Monthly View feature for meeting control. The
WeekHoverBoxTypeprovides a clear structure for a component that will likely be used in the desktop monthly view.A few points to consider for future development:
- As the feature progresses, ensure that this type is used consistently across the monthly view implementation.
- Consider adding JSDoc comments to provide more context about how this type fits into the larger feature.
- If there are any specific requirements or constraints for the
weekproperty, it might be beneficial to use a more specific type or add validation logic where this type is used.As you continue developing the Monthly View feature, keep in mind the following architectural considerations:
- Ensure that this type and related components are easily extensible for potential future requirements (e.g., different view types, additional metadata for weeks).
- Consider creating a set of utility functions or hooks that work with this type to promote code reuse and maintainability.
- If this component is likely to be used in other views (e.g., yearly view), consider placing it in a more general location in the project structure.
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_badge/index.tsx (2)
7-23: Consider making the component more flexible.The styling approach using the
sxprop and CSS variables is good for consistency and maintainability. However, the fixed height and padding might limit the component's flexibility in different contexts.Consider making the height and padding customizable through props, with the current values as defaults. This would make the component more adaptable to various use cases. For example:
interface WeekBadgeType { text: string; height?: string; padding?: string; } const WeekBadge = ({ text, height = '32px', padding = '6px 8px' }: WeekBadgeType) => { return ( <Box sx={{ // ... other styles height, padding, // ... remaining styles }} > <Typography color={'var(--accent-dark)'} className="h4"> {text} </Typography> </Box> ); };
1-27: Consider adding documentation for the component.The
WeekBadgecomponent is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. To improve maintainability and help other developers understand its purpose within the Monthly View feature, consider adding a brief comment or documentation explaining its role and usage.Would you like assistance in drafting a documentation comment for this component?
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_hoverbox/index.tsx (1)
6-10: LGTM: Well-structured component with appropriate state management.The component is correctly implemented as a functional component with proper use of React hooks for state management. The hover delay implementation is a good UX practice.
Consider adding a type annotation for the return type of the component:
-const WeekHoverBox = (props: WeekHoverBoxType) => { +const WeekHoverBox: React.FC<WeekHoverBoxType> = (props) => {This improves type safety and makes the component's contract more explicit.
src/features/index.ts (1)
55-55: LGTM! Consider grouping related exports.The new export for
MonthlyViewis correctly placed in the "Meetings" section and follows the established syntax pattern. This addition aligns well with the PR objective of introducing a Monthly View for meeting control.As a minor suggestion for improved code organization, consider grouping closely related exports together. For instance, you might want to place
MonthlyViewnext toWeekSelectorsince they both deal with time-based views.Here's a suggested reordering of the exports in the "Meetings" section:
/* -------------------------------- Meetings -------------------------------- */ export { default as WeekSelector } from './meetings/week_selector'; export { default as MonthlyView } from './meetings/monthly_view'; export { default as MidweekExport } from './meetings/midweek_export'; export { default as MyAssignments } from './meetings/my_assignments'; export { default as ScheduleAutofillDialog } from './meetings/schedule_autofill';This grouping puts time-based views together, followed by other meeting-related features.
src/pages/meetings/midweek/index.tsx (2)
89-105: Consider clarifying the toggle buttons logicThe conditional rendering of the toggle buttons based on
openWeekViewanddesktopUpmay benefit from additional comments explaining the intended behavior, especially regarding how it handles mobile devices.
135-149: Add unit tests for the new monthly view functionalityWith the addition of the monthly view, consider adding unit tests to cover the new components and ensure their correct behavior.
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/useMonthlyView.tsx (1)
49-49: InitializecurrentYearas a number to avoid unnecessary parsing.The
currentYearis currently stored as a string but is used as a number after parsing. Consider initializingcurrentYearas a number to avoid unnecessary use ofparseInt.Apply this diff to make the change:
- const currentYear = new Date().getFullYear().toString(); + const currentYear = new Date().getFullYear();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/locales/en/meetings.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- src/features/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/features/meetings/monthly_view/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/meetings/monthly_view/useMonthlyView.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_badge/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_badge/index.types.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_hoverbox/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_hoverbox/index.types.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/pages/meetings/midweek/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/pages/meetings/midweek/useMidweek.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/index.tsx
[error] 159-159: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 221-222: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 257-258: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 309-310: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 353-354: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 365-366: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 417-418: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 557-558: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 593-594: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 655-656: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 699-700: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 735-736: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 797-798: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 842-843: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 878-879: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 940-941: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 977-978: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 989-990: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 1016-1017: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
[error] 1028-1029: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_badge/index.types.tsx (1)
1-3: Verify usage of WeekBadgeType in related components.To ensure the completeness of the Monthly View feature implementation, it would be helpful to verify how
WeekBadgeTypeis being used in other components.Let's check for the usage of
WeekBadgeTypein other files:This will help us understand how
WeekBadgeTypeis integrated into the Monthly View feature and ensure that it's being used consistently across the implementation.✅ Verification successful
WeekBadgeType is correctly scoped and used only within index.tsx.
No additional usages of
WeekBadgeTypewere found in other components, ensuring consistency and proper implementation within the Monthly View feature.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of WeekBadgeType in other files # Test: Look for imports of WeekBadgeType echo "Files importing WeekBadgeType:" rg --type typescript "import.*WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view # Test: Look for usage of WeekBadgeType echo "\nFiles using WeekBadgeType:" rg --type typescript "WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view # Test: Look for potential React components that might use WeekBadgeType echo "\nPotential React components in the monthly_view directory:" rg --type typescript "React.FC<.*>" src/features/meetings/monthly_viewLength of output: 598
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of WeekBadgeType in other files with corrected type identifiers # Test: Look for imports of WeekBadgeType echo "Files importing WeekBadgeType:" rg --type ts "import.*WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view rg --type tsx "import.*WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view # Test: Look for usage of WeekBadgeType echo "\nFiles using WeekBadgeType:" rg --type ts "WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view rg --type tsx "WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view # Test: Look for potential React components that might use WeekBadgeType echo "\nPotential React components in the monthly_view directory:" rg --type ts "React.FC<.*>" src/features/meetings/monthly_view rg --type tsx "React.FC<.*>" src/features/meetings/monthly_viewLength of output: 1159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of WeekBadgeType in other files with corrected type identifiers # Test: Look for imports of WeekBadgeType echo "Files importing WeekBadgeType:" rg --type ts "import.*WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view rg --type typescriptreact "import.*WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view # Test: Look for usage of WeekBadgeType echo "\nFiles using WeekBadgeType:" rg --type ts "WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view rg --type typescriptreact "WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view # Test: Look for potential React components that might use WeekBadgeType echo "\nPotential React components in the monthly_view directory:" rg --type ts "React.FC<.*>" src/features/meetings/monthly_view rg --type typescriptreact "React.FC<.*>" src/features/meetings/monthly_viewLength of output: 1231
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of WeekBadgeType in other files using file extensions instead of --type # Test: Look for imports of WeekBadgeType echo "Files importing WeekBadgeType:" rg "import.*WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Test: Look for usage of WeekBadgeType echo "\nFiles using WeekBadgeType:" rg "WeekBadgeType" src/features/meetings/monthly_view --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Test: Look for potential React components that might use WeekBadgeType echo "\nPotential React components in the monthly_view directory:" rg "React.FC<.*>" src/features/meetings/monthly_view --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 926
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_hoverbox/index.types.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly defined and follow good practices:
- Using named imports enhances code readability.
- Importing from '@definition/sources' suggests a well-organized project structure with centralized type definitions.
- Importing ReactNode from 'react' is correct for typing React components.
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_badge/index.tsx (3)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly organized, using a custom Typography component, Material-UI's Box, and a local type definition. This setup promotes consistency and type safety.
5-25: LGTM: Component structure follows React best practices.The
WeekBadgecomponent is well-structured as a functional component with typed props. It has a clear, single responsibility of rendering a badge, which is good for maintainability and reusability.
27-27: LGTM: Export is appropriate for a single component.The default export of the
WeekBadgecomponent is correct and follows common practices for React components.src/pages/meetings/midweek/useMidweek.tsx (3)
13-13: Verify the initial state ofopenWeekViewThe
openWeekViewstate is initialized totrue, which means the week view will be open by default. Consider if this is the desired behavior:
- Does it align with the user experience design?
- Should it respect user preferences (e.g., last used view)?
- Is there a performance impact of having it open by default?
If adjustments are needed, you might want to initialize it to
falseor use a more dynamic approach:const [openWeekView, setOpenWeekView] = useState(() => { // Example: Check user preference or default to false return localStorage.getItem('preferWeekView') === 'true' || false; });
34-37: LGTM: Handler functions for week viewThe
handleOpenWeekViewandhandleCloseWeekViewfunctions are well-implemented:
- They follow the existing pattern in the file.
- They are concise and have a single responsibility.
- No unnecessary complexity is introduced.
Line range hint
1-58: Address discrepancy between PR objectives and implemented changesThe changes in this file implement a "Week View" feature, but the PR objectives mention a "Monthly View". This discrepancy needs to be addressed:
- If the intention is to implement a Monthly View, the current changes may need to be adjusted.
- If the Week View is correct, the PR title and description should be updated to reflect this.
Additionally, consider adding documentation or comments to explain the purpose and usage of the week view feature. This will help other developers understand the new functionality and how it fits into the overall application.
Could you clarify whether this implementation is for a Week View or a Monthly View? If it's for a Week View, please update the PR title and description accordingly. If it's for a Monthly View, we may need to revisit the implementation.
Also, consider adding a brief comment above the
openWeekViewstate declaration to explain its purpose and any important details about the Week View feature.src/features/meetings/monthly_view/week_hoverbox/index.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and complete.The imports are correctly structured, using both local and absolute paths. All imported items appear to be used in the component.
53-57: Please clarify the MeetingPart component's props.The MeetingPart component is receiving
week,type, andcolorprops, but it's unclear what these represent or how they're used.Could you provide more context on the MeetingPart component? Specifically:
- What do the
weekandtypeprops represent?- Is the
colorprop always set to'var(--black)', or should it be dynamic?To help understand the usage of MeetingPart, I'd like to run the following script:
This will help us understand how MeetingPart is used elsewhere in the project and ensure consistency.
src/pages/meetings/midweek/index.tsx (3)
2-8: Imports added for new iconsThe necessary icons have been imported to support the new monthly and weekly view toggle functionality.
11-11: MonthlyView component importedThe
MonthlyViewcomponent is now imported, allowing the monthly view to be displayed.
43-45: Verify new state and handlers in useMidweek hookEnsure that
openWeekView,handleOpenWeekView, andhandleCloseWeekVieware correctly defined and exported by theuseMidweekhook.Run the following script to confirm their definitions:
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/index.tsx (1)
1130-1157:⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing
keyprop to<PersonSelector>componentsWithin your
selectedWeeks.map, thePersonSelectorcomponents should have uniquekeyprops. Ensure each instance has akeyprop to prevent rendering issues.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
{selectedWeeks.map((value, index) => { return ( <PersonSelector + key={`closing-prayer-${index}`} week={value} label={t('tr_prayer')} type={AssignmentCode.MM_Prayer} assignment="MM_ClosingPrayer" readOnly={false} /> ); })}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/useMonthlyView.tsx (2)
56-105: Consider grouping related state variables.The current implementation has many separate state variables for related data. Consider grouping them into objects to improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.
Example refactoring:
interface AYFPart { type: AssignmentCode | null; isTalk: boolean; } interface WeekState { type: Week; ayfCount: number; ayfParts: AYFPart[]; lcCount: number; customPart: { enabled: boolean; hasCustom: boolean; }; lcParts: { noAssign: boolean[]; isOverwrite: boolean[]; }; } const [weekStates, setWeekStates] = useState<WeekState[]>( Array(selectedWeeks.length).fill({ type: Week.NORMAL, ayfCount: 1, ayfParts: Array(4).fill({ type: null, isTalk: false }), lcCount: 1, customPart: { enabled: true, hasCustom: false }, lcParts: { noAssign: Array(3).fill(false), isOverwrite: Array(2).fill(false), }, }) );
1-406: Consider implementing a more robust state management pattern.The current implementation, while functional, could benefit from a more structured approach:
- Consider using a reducer pattern to manage the complex state updates
- Implement error boundaries to handle potential runtime errors
- Add TypeScript interfaces for all the data structures
- Consider using a state machine for managing the different view states (TGW, AYF, LC)
This would improve maintainability, type safety, and error handling throughout the component.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/useMonthlyView.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/features/meetings/monthly_view/useMonthlyView.tsx (4)
1-36: LGTM! Well-organized imports and initialization.
The imports are logically grouped and the hook initialization is clean.
172-182: Previous review comment about type safety is still valid.
350-404: LGTM! Well-structured return object.
The return object is well-organized with clear groupings and helpful comments.
37-47:
Add null checks to prevent runtime errors.
The getWeeksByMonthAndYear function assumes that the month will always be found and directly accesses the weeks property without any safety checks.
Apply this diff to add the necessary checks:
const getWeeksByMonthAndYear = (year: number, month: number) => {
let weeks = [];
sourcesFormatted.forEach((srcYear) => {
if (srcYear.value == year) {
- weeks = srcYear.months.find(
+ const foundMonth = srcYear.months.find(
(formattedMonth) => formattedMonth.value == month
- ).weeks;
+ );
+ if (foundMonth) {
+ weeks = foundMonth.weeks;
+ }
}
});
return weeks;
};Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
@rhahao Hi, I fixed some bugs that were causing "red text" in the console. |
|
@rhahao Will this commit be in the new version that will be released on December 1st? |
|
Hello @joaochris, no it will not be included yet, but it will be available shortly after that. Thank you. |
✅ Deploy Preview for staging-organized ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist: