feat(features): use stepper for congregation creation workflow #2900
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several significant changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on the conversion of SVG icons to React components, the restructuring of user account creation processes, and updates to application state management. Key modifications include enhancements to SVG handling in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UI
participant Hook
participant API
User->>UI: Interacts with the UI
UI->>Hook: Calls relevant hook function
Hook->>API: Makes API call for data
API-->>Hook: Returns data
Hook-->>UI: Updates state
UI-->>User: Renders updated UI
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 23
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (35)
src/features/app_start/vip/user_account_created/useUserAccountCreated.tsx (2)
7-17: Add TypeScript type annotations for better maintainability.The hook would benefit from explicit type annotations for better code maintainability and IDE support.
Consider applying these changes:
-const useUserAccountCreated = () => { +interface UseUserAccountCreatedReturn { + handleCreateCongregation: () => void; +} + +const useUserAccountCreated = (): UseUserAccountCreatedReturn => {
11-14: Consider renaming the handler function for clarity.The function name
handleCreateCongregationimplies creation, but it's actually transitioning between states. A more accurate name would better reflect its purpose.Consider renaming to
handleTransitionToCongregationCreationor similar to better describe its behavior:- const handleCreateCongregation = () => { + const handleTransitionToCongregationCreation = () => { setUserCreated(false); setCongCreate(true); };src/features/app_start/shared/account_chooser/useAccountChooser.tsx (1)
10-18: Consider using a transaction-like pattern for state updates.The sequence of state updates could lead to unnecessary re-renders or race conditions if components are watching these states. Consider combining these updates or using a transaction-like pattern.
Here's a suggested approach:
const handleChoosePocket = async () => { await dbAppSettingsUpdate({ 'user_settings.account_type': 'pocket' }); - setIsUserAccountCreated(false); - setIsAccountChoose(false); + // Batch state updates to minimize re-renders + Promise.resolve().then(() => { + setIsUserAccountCreated(false); + setIsAccountChoose(false); + }); }; const handleChooseVIP = async () => { await dbAppSettingsUpdate({ 'user_settings.account_type': 'vip' }); - setIsUserAccountCreated(false); - setIsAccountChoose(false); + // Batch state updates to minimize re-renders + Promise.resolve().then(() => { + setIsUserAccountCreated(false); + setIsAccountChoose(false); + }); };Additionally, consider extracting the common logic into a shared function to maintain DRY principles:
const updateAccountType = async (type: 'pocket' | 'vip') => { await dbAppSettingsUpdate({ 'user_settings.account_type': type }); Promise.resolve().then(() => { setIsUserAccountCreated(false); setIsAccountChoose(false); }); };src/features/app_start/vip/startup/index.tsx (1)
27-27: Review loading state condition.The loading condition
!isCongCreate && !isEncryptionCodeOpen && isLoadingseems complex. Consider extracting this logic into a descriptive variable or hook for better readability.+ const isShowingLoader = !isCongCreate && !isEncryptionCodeOpen && isLoading; - {!isCongCreate && !isEncryptionCodeOpen && isLoading && <WaitingLoader />} + {isShowingLoader && <WaitingLoader />}src/features/app_start/vip/terms_use/useTermsUse.tsx (1)
21-23: Add error handling for localStorage operations.Consider wrapping localStorage operations in try-catch blocks to handle potential exceptions (e.g., when storage is full or blocked).
- localStorage.setItem('userConsent', 'accept'); - localStorage.setItem('ui_lang', lang); - localStorage.setItem('app_font', font); + try { + localStorage.setItem('userConsent', 'accept'); + localStorage.setItem('ui_lang', lang); + localStorage.setItem('app_font', font); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to save user preferences:', error); + // Consider showing a user-friendly notification + }src/features/app_start/vip/vip_info_tip/index.tsx (2)
37-39: Add aria-label to improve accessibility.The close button should have an aria-label to help screen reader users understand its purpose.
- <IconButton onClick={handleToggleVisibility} sx={{ padding: 0 }}> + <IconButton + onClick={handleToggleVisibility} + sx={{ padding: 0 }} + aria-label="Close help message" + >
17-28: Consider using theme spacing for consistency.Instead of hard-coded pixel values, consider using MUI's theme spacing system for more consistent spacing across the application.
sx={{ borderRadius: '12px', width: '100%', maxWidth: '800px', border: '1px solid var(--accent-300)', - gap: '8px', - padding: '16px', + gap: 1, + padding: 2, backgroundColor: 'var(--accent-100)', display: 'flex', flexDirection: 'row', alignItems: 'flex-start', }}src/components/icons/IconCongregationAccess.tsx (3)
3-9: Add JSDoc comments to improve type documentation.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of each prop and provide examples of usage.
type IconProps = { + /** Color of the icon. Default: '#222222' */ color?: string; + /** Width of the icon in pixels. Default: 24 */ width?: number; + /** Height of the icon in pixels. Default: 24 */ height?: number; + /** Material-UI system props for additional styling */ sx?: SxProps<Theme>; + /** Additional CSS class name */ className?: string; };
19-21: Optimize className handling.The className concatenation can be simplified using Material-UI's built-in className handling.
<SvgIcon - className={`organized-icon-congregation-access ${className}`} + className={className} + classes={{root: 'organized-icon-congregation-access'}} sx={{ width: `${width}px`, height: `${height}px`, ...sx }}
23-29: Remove redundant SVG dimensions.The width and height attributes on the inner SVG are redundant since SvgIcon already handles sizing.
<svg - width="24" - height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"src/features/language_switcher/useLanguage.tsx (1)
Line range hint
30-63: Consider adding error handling for language switching.The language switching logic could benefit from error handling to gracefully handle cases where:
- The language is not found in LANGUAGE_LIST
- The database update fails
- The window reload fails
Consider wrapping the operations in try-catch blocks:
const handleLangChange = async (ui_lang: string) => { + try { + const langRecord = LANGUAGE_LIST.find((record) => record.locale === ui_lang); + if (!langRecord) { + throw new Error(`Unsupported language: ${ui_lang}`); + } const fullnameOption = - LANGUAGE_LIST.find((record) => record.locale === ui_lang) - .fullnameOption || FullnameOption.FIRST_BEFORE_LAST; + langRecord.fullnameOption || FullnameOption.FIRST_BEFORE_LAST; // ... rest of the function ... - window.location.reload(); + window.location.reload(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to change language:', error); + // Consider showing a user-friendly error message + } };src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_master_key/useCongregationMasterKey.tsx (1)
Line range hint
31-49: Add rate limiting to prevent brute force attacks.The
handleValidateMasterKeyfunction should implement rate limiting to prevent brute force attempts. Currently, there's no limit on how many times a user can attempt validation.Consider implementing:
- A maximum number of attempts before temporary lockout
- Exponential backoff between attempts
- Account/IP-based rate limiting at the API level
Example implementation:
const MAX_ATTEMPTS = 5; const LOCKOUT_TIME = 15 * 60 * 1000; // 15 minutes interface ValidationState { attempts: number; lastAttempt: number; lockedUntil: number; } // Add to state const [validationState, setValidationState] = useState<ValidationState>({ attempts: 0, lastAttempt: 0, lockedUntil: 0, });src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_access_code/useCongregationAccessCode.tsx (2)
Line range hint
31-49: Improve error handling and logging security.The current implementation has several concerns:
- Console logging of decryption errors could expose sensitive information
- Generic error handling might mask specific issues during debugging
Consider implementing:
- Structured error logging without sensitive data
- Development-only detailed logging
- Specific error types for different failure scenarios
- console.error(err); + // Log error type without sensitive details + console.error('Access code validation failed:', err.name);
Line range hint
51-86: Improve side effect handling and cleanup.The useEffect hook handling authentication and database operations has potential issues:
- Missing cleanup function could lead to memory leaks
- Possible race conditions with async operations
- No loading state management for database operations
Consider implementing:
useEffect(() => { + let isSubscribed = true; const getAccessCode = async () => { setIsLoading(true); try { const { status, result } = await apiValidateMe(); + if (!isSubscribed) return; if (status === 403) { await userSignOut(); return; } // ... rest of the code } finally { if (isSubscribed) { setIsLoading(false); } } }; if (isAuthenticated) getAccessCode(); + return () => { + isSubscribed = false; + }; }, [isAuthenticated, congNumber]);src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_master_key/index.tsx (2)
23-24: Good refactoring of the component logic.The renaming of
handleActiontohandleValidateMasterKeyimproves code clarity by being more specific about the function's purpose. The removal of multiple validation states also simplifies the component's logic.Consider adding TypeScript types for the hook's return values to improve type safety and maintainability.
Line range hint
97-106: Improve error message handling and accessibility.Using
display: 'none'through CSS might not be the best approach for conditional rendering and could affect accessibility.Consider using React's conditional rendering instead:
- <Box id="onboarding-error" sx={{ display: 'none' }}> + {message && ( + <Box id="onboarding-error" role="alert"> <InfoMessage variant={variant} messageIcon={<IconError />} messageHeader={title} message={message} onClose={hideMessage} /> + </Box> + )}src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_access_code/useCongregationAccessCode.tsx (2)
15-22: Consider extracting password validation constants.The password validation criteria (length, patterns) are currently hardcoded in the effect hook. Consider extracting these into named constants for better maintainability and reusability.
+const PASSWORD_REQUIREMENTS = { + MIN_LENGTH: 8, + PATTERNS: { + NUMBER: /\d/, + LOWERCASE: /[a-z]/, + UPPERCASE: /[A-Z]/, + SPECIAL: /[!@#$%^&*(),.?"':{}|<>]/ + } +};
80-98: Add TypeScript interface for hook return type.Consider adding TypeScript types to improve type safety and documentation of the hook's return value.
interface UseCongregationAccessCodeReturn { tmpAccessCode: string; setTmpAccessCode: (value: string) => void; isLengthPassed: boolean; isNumberPassed: boolean; isLowerCasePassed: boolean; isUpperCasePassed: boolean; isSpecialSymbolPassed: boolean; isProcessing: boolean; message: string; title: string; hideMessage: () => void; variant: string; isMatch: boolean; setTmpAccessCodeVerify: (value: string) => void; tmpAccessCodeVerify: string; btnActionDisabled: boolean; handleSetAccessCode: () => Promise<void>; } const useCongregationAccessCode = (): UseCongregationAccessCodeReturn => {src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
35-137: Consider simplifying the nested Box structure.While the layout works correctly, the multiple nested Box components could be simplified to improve maintainability. Consider extracting the form section into a separate component or using a CSS Grid layout for better organization.
- <Box - sx={{ - display: 'flex', - flexDirection: 'column', - height: '100%', - width: '100%', - }} - > - <Box - sx={{ - display: 'flex', - flexDirection: 'column', - gap: '24px', - alignItems: 'flex-start', - alignSelf: 'stretch', - width: '100%', - }} - > + <Box + sx={{ + display: 'flex', + flexDirection: 'column', + gap: '24px', + width: '100%', + height: '100%', + }} + >src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/useCongregationDetails.tsx (1)
Line range hint
42-146: Consider breaking down the handleCongregationAction function for better maintainability.The function currently handles multiple responsibilities including validation, API calls, error handling, storage updates, and settings management. Consider splitting it into smaller, focused functions:
+ const validateInputs = () => { + if (userTmpFirstName.length === 0 || country === null || congregation === null) { + throw new Error('incomplete_info'); + } + }; + const updateCongregationSettings = async (result: CongregationCreateResponseType) => { + const midweekMeeting = structuredClone(settings.cong_settings.midweek_meeting); + // ... meeting settings logic ... + await dbAppSettingsUpdate({...}); + }; const handleCongregationAction = async () => { if (isProcessing) return; hideMessage(); setIsProcessing(true); try { - if (userTmpFirstName.length === 0 || country === null || congregation === null) { - // ... validation logic ... - } + validateInputs(); const { status, data } = await apiCreateCongregation(...); // ... error handling ... const result = data as CongregationCreateResponseType; setCongID(result.cong_id); worker.postMessage({ field: 'congID', value: result.cong_id }); - // ... meeting settings logic ... + await updateCongregationSettings(result); await setIsNewCongregation(true); setUserID(result.user_id); setCurrentStep(1); } catch (err) { // ... error handling ... } };src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_master_key/index.tsx (2)
1-11: LGTM! Consider organizing imports by category.While the imports are correct, consider organizing them into groups for better maintainability:
- External dependencies (MUI)
- Internal components
- Hooks
- Icons
- Local imports
35-77: Consider extracting inline styles for better maintainability.The layout structure is well-organized, but the inline styles could be moved to a separate styles object or styled components to improve readability and reusability.
Example refactor:
const styles = { container: { display: 'flex', flexDirection: 'column', justifyContent: 'space-between', width: '100%', gap: '24px', flexGrow: 1, }, warningBox: { display: 'flex', padding: '8px 16px', alignItems: 'center', gap: '8px', borderRadius: 'var(--radius-l)', background: 'var(--red-secondary)', marginBottom: '32px', }, // ... other styles };src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_access_code/index.tsx (3)
13-34: Consider adding TypeScript interfaces for better type safety.While the code is well-structured, adding TypeScript interfaces would improve maintainability and provide better IDE support.
interface ValidationState { isLengthPassed: boolean; isNumberPassed: boolean; isLowerCasePassed: boolean; isUpperCasePassed: boolean; isSpecialSymbolPassed: boolean; isMatch: boolean; } interface AccessCodeState { tmpAccessCode: string; tmpAccessCodeVerify: string; isProcessing: boolean; btnActionDisabled: boolean; } interface MessageState { hideMessage: () => void; message: string; title: string; variant: string; }
62-77: Enhance accessibility for the warning notice.Consider adding ARIA attributes to improve screen reader support for the warning message.
<Box sx={{ display: 'flex', padding: '8px 16px', alignItems: 'center', gap: '8px', borderRadius: 'var(--radius-l)', background: 'var(--orange-secondary)', marginBottom: '32px', }} + role="alert" + aria-live="polite" >
154-165: Consider adding tooltip for disabled button state.When the button is disabled, users would benefit from knowing why they can't proceed.
<Button variant="main" sx={{ width: '100%' }} onClick={handleSetAccessCode} startIcon={ isProcessing ? <IconLoading width={22} height={22} /> : null } disabled={btnActionDisabled} + title={btnActionDisabled ? t('tr_congregationAccessCodeValidationRequired') : ''} >src/hooks/useUserAutoLogin.tsx (1)
Line range hint
84-177: Enhance error handling and status reporting.The current error handling only logs to console and doesn't update the
autoLoginStatus. This could leave users unaware of login failures.Consider adding error states to provide better feedback:
try { // ... existing code ... } catch (error) { console.error(error); + logger.error('app', 'Auto login failed'); + setAutoLoginStatus('auto login failed'); }Also consider adding a loading state:
const [autoLoginStatus, setAutoLoginStatus] = useState< 'idle' | 'loading' | 'completed' | 'failed' >('idle');src/features/app_start/vip/oauth/button_base/useButtonBase.tsx (2)
110-112: Consider using batch updates for multiple state changes.While the state updates are logically correct, consider using Recoil's batch updates to handle multiple state changes atomically. This can prevent potential race conditions and unnecessary re-renders.
Example refactor:
- setIsUserSignIn(false); - setIsUserAccountCreated(false); - setIsUnauthorizedRole(false); - setUserMfaVerify(true); + import { batch } from 'recoil'; + + batch(() => { + setIsUserSignIn(false); + setIsUserAccountCreated(false); + setIsUnauthorizedRole(false); + setUserMfaVerify(true); + });Also applies to: 117-117
Line range hint
1-224: Consider enhancing TypeScript usage.The code could benefit from stronger typing:
- Add explicit return types for all functions
- Define interfaces for the app settings structure
- Use discriminated unions for the NextStepType
Example improvements:
interface AppSettings { user_settings: { account_type: string; lastname: string; firstname: string; mfa: 'enabled' | 'not_enabled'; cong_role: string[]; }; cong_settings?: { country_code: string; cong_name: string; cong_number: string; // ... other settings }; } interface NextStepType { isVerifyMFA?: boolean; createCongregation?: boolean; unauthorized?: boolean; encryption?: boolean; } const updateUserSettings = async ( response: UserLoginResponseType, nextStep: NextStepType ): Promise<void> => { // ... implementation };src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/useCongregationCreate.tsx (1)
14-26: Ensure consistent formatting of thestepsarray objects for better readabilityThere's inconsistency in how the objects within the
stepsarray are formatted. Some objects are spread over multiple lines, while others are condensed into a single line. For improved readability and maintainability, consider formatting all objects in the same, consistent manner.Apply this diff to standardize the formatting:
16 { 17 label: t('tr_congregationDetails'), 18 Component: <CongregationDetails />, 19 }, 20- { label: t('tr_createMasterKey'), Component: <CongregationMasterKey /> }, + { + label: t('tr_createMasterKey'), + Component: <CongregationMasterKey />, + }, 21 { 22 label: t('tr_createAccessCode'), 23 Component: <CongregationAccessCode />, 24 },src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/index.tsx (2)
24-62: Consider extracting inline styles to enhance maintainability.The inline styles defined within the
sxprop for theStepper,Step, and nested components make the code harder to maintain and reuse. Extracting these styles into a separate styled component or using MUI'smakeStylesorstyledAPI can improve readability and promote reusability.
35-55: Leverage MUI theme palette instead of custom CSS variables for colors.Using custom CSS variables like
var(--accent-main)bypasses MUI's theming capabilities. Consider defining these colors in the theme's palette and referencing them via the theme to ensure consistency and easier maintenance across the application.src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_master_key/useCongregationMasterKey.tsx (2)
80-80: Expand special character validation in password requirementsThe current regex for special symbols may not cover all possible special characters that users might use. Consider expanding the regex to include additional symbols like
_,-,+,=,[,],\,/,`,~, and others to enhance password flexibility.Apply this diff to update the regex:
- setIsSpecialSymbolPassed(/[!@#$%^&*(),.?"’:{}|<>]/.test(tmpMasterKey)); + setIsSpecialSymbolPassed(/[!@#$%^&*(),.?"’:{}|<>_\-+=\[\]\\\/`~]/.test(tmpMasterKey));
29-35: Simplify 'btnActionDisabled' logic using array and 'every' methodYou can simplify the
btnActionDisabledlogic by using an array of the validation flags and theeverymethod. This enhances readability and makes it easier to maintain if more validations are added in the future.Apply this diff:
const btnActionDisabled = - !isLengthPassed || - !isNumberPassed || - !isLowerCasePassed || - !isUpperCasePassed || - !isSpecialSymbolPassed || - !isMatch; + const validations = [ + isLengthPassed, + isNumberPassed, + isLowerCasePassed, + isUpperCasePassed, + isSpecialSymbolPassed, + isMatch, + ]; + const btnActionDisabled = !validations.every(condition => condition);src/features/app_start/vip/startup/useStartup.tsx (2)
138-148: Simplify nested conditions for setting the current stepThe nested
ifconditions determining the current congregation creation step (lines 138-148) can be simplified for better readability.Consider refactoring the conditions:
if (masterKeyNeeded) { if (remoteMasterKey.length === 0) { setCurrentStep(1); } else if (remoteAccessCode.length === 0) { setCurrentStep(2); } }This structure makes the flow of logic clearer by grouping related conditions together.
70-160: Dependency array might cause unnecessary re-rendersThe dependency array of
runStartupCheck(lines 161-168) includes several variables that might change frequently, potentially causingrunStartupCheckto be re-created and theuseEffecthook (lines 180-181) to run multiple times unnecessarily.Review the necessity of each dependency in
runStartupCheck. If certain variables don't affect the function's logic significantly, you might exclude them to prevent unintended re-runs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
converter/svg/sources/name=congregation-access.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg,!**/*.svgsrc/locales/en/onboarding.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
converter/svg/convert.js(1 hunks)src/RootWrap.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/icons/IconCongregationAccess.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/icons/index.ts(2 hunks)src/features/app_start/shared/account_chooser/useAccountChooser.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_access_code/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_access_code/useCongregationAccessCode.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/index.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/useCongregationDetails.tsx(4 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_master_key/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_master_key/useCongregationMasterKey.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/useCongregationCreate.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_access_code/index.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_access_code/useCongregationAccessCode.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_master_key/index.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_master_key/useCongregationMasterKey.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/oauth/button_base/useButtonBase.tsx(4 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/startup/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/startup/useStartup.tsx(5 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/terms_use/useTermsUse.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/user_account_created/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/user_account_created/useUserAccountCreated.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/vip_info_tip/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/language_switcher/useLanguage.tsx(2 hunks)src/hooks/useUserAutoLogin.tsx(2 hunks)src/services/i18n/index.ts(1 hunks)src/states/app.ts(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/RootWrap.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (51)
src/features/app_start/vip/user_account_created/useUserAccountCreated.tsx (3)
1-6: LGTM! Clean and well-structured imports.
The imports are properly organized and use named imports for better tree-shaking.
19-19: LGTM! Proper export statement.
The default export follows React hooks naming convention.
3-5: Verify the state atoms implementation.
Let's ensure the Recoil atoms are properly implemented and typed.
✅ Verification successful
State atoms are properly implemented and used consistently
The verification confirms:
- Both atoms
isCongAccountCreateStateandisUserAccountCreatedStateare properly defined insrc/states/app.tsas boolean Recoil atoms - The atoms are used correctly in the hook with proper setter functions via
useSetRecoilState - The state management is consistent with the component's purpose of handling user account creation and congregation setup flow
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of Recoil atoms in @states/app
# Test: Check the atom definitions
rg -A 5 "isCongAccountCreateState|isUserAccountCreatedState" --type ts
Length of output: 8565
src/features/app_start/vip/startup/index.tsx (3)
1-11: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized.
The new imports for UserAccountCreated and WaitingLoader components are properly organized and align with their usage in the component.
Line range hint 24-36: Verify the component rendering order.
The sequence of conditional renders implies a specific flow:
- Terms of Use (always shown)
- Authentication steps (SignIn/MFA)
- Account creation
- Congregation setup
Please verify if this order aligns with the intended user journey in the stepper workflow.
Consider implementing a step tracker or progress indicator to help users understand where they are in the flow, aligning with the PR's objective of using a stepper for the congregation creation workflow.
13-22: Verify state transitions in useStartup hook.
The new states (isUserAccountCreated, isCongCreate, isLoading) suggest a sequential flow. Let's verify the state management implementation to ensure proper transitions.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the state transitions by looking at the specific implementation.
State management implementation is properly structured
The verification shows that:
- The states are correctly managed using Recoil's state management
- The hook follows a clear pattern of reading states (
useRecoilValue) and setting states (useSetRecoilState) - The new states (
isUserAccountCreated,isCongCreate) are properly integrated with the existing state management pattern - The states represent different steps in the authentication and setup flow, with clear transitions through the
useSetRecoilStatesetters
The implementation aligns with the expected state management patterns and maintains proper separation of concerns between reading and writing states.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the state management implementation in useStartup hook
# Expected: Find the state definitions and transition logic
# Search for state definitions
echo "Searching for state definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = useRecoilState($_)'
# Search for transition logic
echo "Searching for state transition logic..."
rg -A 5 'useStartup'
Length of output: 13147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of useStartup hook in VIP startup
echo "Searching for useStartup implementation in VIP startup..."
rg -A 20 "const useStartup = \(\) => {" src/features/app_start/vip/startup/useStartup.tsx
# Search for related state definitions
echo "Searching for related state definitions..."
rg "State = atom|selector\(" src/features/app_start/vip/startup/
Length of output: 498
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of useStartup hook in VIP startup with fixed regex
echo "Searching for useStartup implementation..."
rg -A 20 "^const useStartup = \(\) =>" src/features/app_start/vip/startup/useStartup.tsx
# Search for state atoms and selectors in the startup directory
echo "Searching for state definitions..."
rg "export const \w+State = (atom|selector)\(" src/features/app_start/vip/
# Search for state usage in useStartup
echo "Searching for state usage in useStartup..."
rg "use(RecoilState|RecoilValue|SetRecoilState)" src/features/app_start/vip/startup/useStartup.tsx
Length of output: 2804
src/features/app_start/vip/user_account_created/index.tsx (4)
2-3: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The new imports maintain a clear separation between external libraries and internal modules.
40-42: Verify error handling in handleCreateCongregation.
The button click handler has been simplified, which is good. However, ensure that the handleCreateCongregation function in the hook properly handles errors and edge cases.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check error handling in the hook
# Expected: Find try-catch blocks or error handling patterns
# Search for error handling patterns in the hook
rg -A 5 "try.*catch|throw|Error" "./src/features/app_start/vip/user_account_created/useUserAccountCreated.tsx"11-11: Verify the implementation of useUserAccountCreated hook.
Good separation of concerns by moving the congregation creation logic to a custom hook.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of useUserAccountCreated hook
# Expected: Find the hook implementation and verify state management
# Search for the hook implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const useUserAccountCreated = () => {
$$$
}'
# Check for any Recoil state usage in the hook
rg -A 5 "useRecoilState|useSetRecoilState" "./src/features/app_start/vip/user_account_created/useUserAccountCreated.tsx"8-8: Verify the removal of setIsCreate prop.
The component signature has been simplified, which is good. However, we should verify that all parent components have been updated to handle this change.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the usage of UserAccountCreated component.
Let me check the parent component to see how it previously used the component and verify if the changes are properly handled.
Prop removal is properly handled
The verification shows that the parent component in src/features/app_start/vip/startup/index.tsx is already using UserAccountCreated without props, and the state management has been moved to Recoil atoms (isCongAccountCreateState and isUserAccountCreatedState). This aligns with the component's new prop-less signature.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of setIsCreate prop with UserAccountCreated
# Expected: No matches, as the prop has been removed
# Search for any file that imports and uses UserAccountCreated with setIsCreate
rg -l "UserAccountCreated.*setIsCreate"
Length of output: 703
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files importing UserAccountCreated component
rg -l "import.*UserAccountCreated.*from"
# Search for actual usage/rendering of UserAccountCreated component with context
rg -A 3 "<UserAccountCreated"
Length of output: 619
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the git history of the parent component to see previous usage
git log -p src/features/app_start/vip/startup/index.tsx | grep -A 10 "UserAccountCreated"
# Also check the current state management in the parent
rg -A 5 "isUserAccountCreated|isCongCreate" src/features/app_start/vip/startup/index.tsx
Length of output: 1781
src/features/app_start/vip/terms_use/useTermsUse.tsx (1)
22-22: Verify migration strategy for existing language settings.
While changing the storage key from 'app_lang' to 'ui_lang' is consistent with other changes, we should ensure existing users' language preferences are migrated.
✅ Verification successful
Migration strategy is already in place - no action needed
The change from 'app_lang' to 'ui_lang' is part of a larger migration system. The codebase shows:
- Only one remaining usage of 'app_lang' in
useSourcesMigrate.jsxwhich is part of the migration system itself - New 'ui_lang' key is consistently used across the application in language-related features
- Comprehensive migration system exists with proper user notifications and data transfer handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of the old 'app_lang' key to ensure complete migration
rg "app_lang" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for any migration utilities or functions
rg -i "migration|migrate" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of the old 'app_lang' key without file type restrictions
rg "app_lang"
# Search for any migration utilities or functions
rg -i "migration|migrate"
# Search for localStorage operations with 'lang' to understand the pattern
rg "localStorage.*lang"
Length of output: 30848
src/features/app_start/vip/vip_info_tip/index.tsx (1)
15-41: LGTM! Clean implementation of conditional rendering.
The change from CSS visibility to conditional rendering is a good improvement that:
- Reduces DOM complexity when the message is hidden
- Improves performance by not maintaining hidden elements
- Makes the code intention clearer
src/components/icons/IconCongregationAccess.tsx (2)
56-56: LGTM!
The export statement follows React conventions.
30-40: Consider using a unique mask ID.
The mask ID mask0_14912_258760 could potentially clash with other SVGs in the application. Consider using a more unique identifier or implementing a dynamic ID generation system.
src/services/i18n/index.ts (1)
9-9: LGTM! Storage key renamed for consistency.
The change from 'app_lang' to 'ui_lang' aligns with the standardization of terminology across the codebase.
src/features/language_switcher/useLanguage.tsx (2)
30-32: LGTM: Parameter renaming is consistent with the new terminology.
The renaming from app_lang to ui_lang is applied consistently in the function signature and LANGUAGE_LIST lookup.
55-57: LGTM: URL parameter update is consistent.
The URL parameter naming is aligned with the new terminology.
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_master_key/useCongregationMasterKey.tsx (2)
Line range hint 51-84: LGTM! Robust authentication and cleanup handling.
The authentication effect properly handles various error cases and includes appropriate cleanup procedures:
- Handles unauthorized access (403)
- Manages missing congregation data (404)
- Validates congregation number consistency
- Cleans up local data when needed
Line range hint 90-106: LGTM! Appropriate exposure of hook functionality.
The hook exports only necessary values and functions while keeping sensitive data (like the encrypted master key) properly encapsulated.
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_access_code/useCongregationAccessCode.tsx (2)
Line range hint 98-106: LGTM! Return object structure is clean and focused.
The simplified return object properly reflects the current functionality of the hook.
6-6: Verify security implications of reduced encryption functionality.
The removal of encryption-related imports while retaining only decryptData represents a significant change in the security architecture. Please ensure this aligns with the security requirements for congregation access management.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the encryption-related functionality.
Let me try one final verification to understand the complete encryption service structure.
Reduced encryption imports are consistent with the codebase architecture
The removal of multiple encryption-related imports while retaining only decryptData is correct and maintains security requirements. The verification shows that:
decryptDatais properly implemented insrc/services/encryption/index.tsusing CryptoES.AES- The function is consistently used across the codebase for decrypting sensitive data like access codes, master keys, and congregation data
- The change aligns with the single responsibility principle as other encryption operations are handled through separate imports where needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining encryption-related functionality
# that might be affected by this change
# Search for encryption-related function calls
echo "Checking for encryption-related function calls..."
rg -l "encrypt|decrypt|generateKey" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for security-related comments or documentation
echo "Checking for security-related documentation..."
rg -l "security|encryption|sensitive" --type md
Length of output: 455
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for encryption-related files and their content
echo "Searching for encryption service implementation..."
rg -p "decryptData" --type typescript
# Check for any references to congregation access validation
echo "Checking congregation access validation patterns..."
rg -p "congregationAccess|accessCode" --type typescript
# Look for the encryption service index file
echo "Looking for encryption service index..."
fd -e ts -e tsx "index.ts" -x cat {} | grep -A 5 -B 5 "export.*decrypt"
Length of output: 1119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete encryption service implementation
echo "Checking encryption service implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const decryptData = $_'
# Look for usage of decryptData in the codebase
echo "Checking decryptData usage..."
rg -p "decryptData\(" -A 3 -B 3
# Check for any encryption-related types or interfaces
echo "Checking encryption-related types..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
decrypt$_?: $_;
$$$
}'
Length of output: 9356
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_master_key/index.tsx (2)
2-8: LGTM! Clean import organization.
The imports are well-structured and appropriately grouped by their types (MUI components, icons, hooks, and local components).
51-51: Consider enhancing the description text.
Given the simplified workflow, users might need more context about the master key's importance and usage.
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_encryption/congregation_access_code/index.tsx (5)
2-2: LGTM! Icon import change improves semantic clarity.
The change from IconEncryptionKey to IconCongregationAccess better represents the component's purpose.
74-79: Consider security implications of autoComplete="off".
While disabling autoComplete can enhance security, it might impact accessibility and user experience. Consider if this is strictly necessary for your security requirements.
87-93: LGTM! Button changes improve clarity.
The simplified handler name and consistent button text improve code maintainability while maintaining good UX with loading state feedback.
51-51: Verify if the description is appropriate for all use cases.
The description key tr_congregationAccessCodeLostDesc suggests this is specifically for lost access code scenarios. Please verify if this component is used in other contexts where this description might be inappropriate.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for component usage
rg "CongregationAccessCode" src/14-25: Verify password validation feedback mechanism.
The removal of validation states (isLengthPassed, isNumberPassed, etc.) suggests that password requirements feedback has been moved elsewhere. Please ensure that users still receive clear feedback about password requirements.
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_access_code/useCongregationAccessCode.tsx (3)
1-9: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.
The imports are logically grouped and all appear to be used within the hook.
38-41: Ensure sensitive data is cleaned up.
The encryption key and access code should be cleared from memory after use to prevent potential memory dumps from exposing sensitive data.
[security]
try {
const encryptionKey = generateKey();
const encryptedKey = encryptData(encryptionKey, tmpAccessCode);
+ // Clear sensitive data from memory
+ setTimeout(() => {
+ encryptionKey.fill(0);
+ encryptedKey.fill(0);
+ }, 0);59-62: Avoid exposing internal error details.
The error message is being directly passed from the catch block to the user interface. Consider mapping internal errors to user-friendly messages to avoid exposing implementation details.
[security]
-message: getMessageByCode(err.message),
+message: getMessageByCode('GENERIC_ACCESS_CODE_ERROR'),converter/svg/convert.js (1)
66-71: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making animation handling more robust and configurable.
The current string-based animation handling could be improved in several ways:
- Replace string manipulation with a more structured approach
- Make animation parameters configurable
- Ensure the "rotate" keyframe animation is properly defined
Consider refactoring to this approach:
+ const ICON_ANIMATIONS = {
+ LOADING: {
+ name: 'rotate',
+ duration: '2s',
+ timing: 'linear',
+ iteration: 'infinite'
+ }
+ };
if (componentName === 'IconLoading') {
- data = data.replace(
- ' animation,',
- ' animation: "rotate 2s linear infinite",'
- );
+ const anim = ICON_ANIMATIONS.LOADING;
+ data = data.replace(
+ ' animation,',
+ ` animation: "${anim.name} ${anim.duration} ${anim.timing} ${anim.iteration}",`
+ );
} else {
data = data.replace(' animation,', '');
}Let's verify if the "rotate" keyframe is defined in the styles:
✅ Verification successful
Animation implementation is correctly structured but template handling could be improved
The "rotate" keyframe animation is properly defined in src/global/index.css, and the animation is correctly referenced in the SVG converter. However, the template-based approach could be improved:
- The current implementation uses a template literal with placeholder
animation,which is then replaced. This is fragile and could break if the template structure changes. - The animation string is duplicated in both the template and the replacement logic.
Consider this alternative approach:
const ICON_PROPS = {
animation: componentName === 'IconLoading' ?
'animation: "rotate 2s linear infinite"' :
''
};
// In template string:
<SvgIcon className={} sx={{ width: widthPx, height: heightPx, ${ICON_PROPS.animation}, ...sx }}>This would:
- Eliminate the need for string replacements
- Make the animation handling more maintainable
- Keep the animation logic centralized
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for rotate keyframe definition in CSS/SCSS files
rg -t css -t scss "@keyframes\s+rotate\s*{"
Length of output: 155
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for rotate keyframe definition with fixed regex
rg -t css -t scss "@keyframes rotate"
# Also search in JS/TS files for styled-components or CSS-in-JS definitions
rg -t js -t ts "keyframes.*rotate"
# Search for any animation-related imports or style files
fd -e css -e scss -e styled.js -e styles.js | grep -i 'animation\|rotate'
Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any files with rotate or animation keywords, then examine their content
fd . | rg -i "rotate|animation"
# Search for rotate animation definition in all files
rg "@keyframes rotate"
# Look for the template that's being used for SVG conversion
rg -A 5 "animation," converter/svg/
Length of output: 1183
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the rotate keyframe definition
rg -A 3 "@keyframes rotate" src/global/index.css
# Check the template structure and usage
cat converter/svg/convert.js
Length of output: 3727
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/index.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM! Consistent renaming of component and hook.
The renaming from CongregationInfo to CongregationDetails and corresponding hook update maintains consistency and better reflects the component's purpose.
Also applies to: 13-13
Line range hint 13-33: Verify state management changes in useCongregationDetails hook.
The removal of setIsCreate prop suggests state management has moved to Recoil. Let's verify the implementation of state management in the hook.
✅ Verification successful
State management changes verified successfully
The hook implementation shows a proper mix of local state management using useState for form-related state (congregation details, user info, processing state) and Recoil for global state management (congregationCreateStepState, settingsState). The removal of setIsCreate is justified as the create flow is now managed through Recoil's setIsNewCongregation and congregationCreateStepState.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the state management implementation in useCongregationDetails hook
# Test: Check the hook implementation for Recoil usage
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = useSetRecoilState($_)' src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/useCongregationDetails.tsx
# Test: Check for any remaining references to setIsCreate
rg 'setIsCreate' src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/
Length of output: 386
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the full implementation of useCongregationDetails hook
cat src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/useCongregationDetails.tsx
# Also check for any other Recoil state usage
ast-grep --pattern 'use$_RecoilState($_)' src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/useCongregationDetails.tsx
# Check for local state management using useState
ast-grep --pattern 'const [$_, $_] = useState($_)' src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/useCongregationDetails.tsx
Length of output: 6823
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/useCongregationDetails.tsx (3)
Line range hint 1-20: LGTM! Import changes and hook renaming are well-structured.
The addition of Recoil state management imports and the more descriptive hook name align well with the stepper-based workflow objectives.
25-26: LGTM! State management changes follow best practices.
The introduction of centralized step management via Recoil aligns with the stepper workflow objectives and follows React hooks best practices.
179-179: LGTM! Export statement is consistent with the hook renaming.
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_master_key/index.tsx (1)
12-34: LGTM! Well-structured hook usage.
The component follows React best practices with clear separation of concerns using a custom hook for state management.
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_access_code/index.tsx (3)
1-12: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.
All imported components and utilities are utilized effectively in the component.
36-46: LGTM! Layout structure is well-organized.
The flexbox layout provides a good foundation for responsive design.
47-60: LGTM! Internationalization is properly implemented.
Good use of the Markup component for formatted translated content.
src/hooks/useUserAutoLogin.tsx (1)
172-177: Verify MFA handling in Pocket account flow.
The VIP handler sets MFA status but the Pocket handler doesn't. This might be intentional, but it's worth verifying if Pocket accounts should handle MFA similarly.
src/features/app_start/vip/oauth/button_base/useButtonBase.tsx (3)
8-8: LGTM: Import addition follows conventions.
The new state import is correctly placed and follows the established naming conventions.
36-36: LGTM: State setter initialization is correct.
The new state setter is properly initialized and follows the established patterns for Recoil state management.
165-166: Verify unauthorized user flow and consider batch updates.
The state updates for unauthorized users are logically correct. However:
- Consider using batch updates for multiple state changes.
- Verify that this change doesn't break the unauthorized user flow in the application.
Example refactor for batch updates:
- setUserMfaVerify(true);
- setIsUserAccountCreated(false);
- setIsUnauthorizedRole(true);
+ batch(() => {
+ setUserMfaVerify(true);
+ setIsUserAccountCreated(false);
+ setIsUnauthorizedRole(true);
+ });✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough context about the unauthorized user flow and state management:
State updates in unauthorized user flow are correctly implemented
The changes to set isUserAccountCreated to false when handling unauthorized users is consistent with the codebase's behavior:
- The
isUnauthorizedRolestate is properly managed through a global Recoil state - The unauthorized user flow is handled consistently in the startup component which conditionally renders the
UnauthorizedRolecomponent - Setting
isUserAccountCreatedto false is logical as it's used by account chooser and startup components to control the authentication flow
While batching state updates would be a good optimization, the current implementation is functionally correct and follows the established patterns in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the unauthorized user flow implementation
# Test: Search for other components that handle unauthorized users
rg -A 5 "handleUnauthorizedUser|unauthorized.*user|isUnauthorizedRole"
# Test: Search for components that might be affected by isUserAccountCreated state
ast-grep --pattern 'isUserAccountCreatedState'
Length of output: 19871
src/states/app.ts (1)
568-571: LGTM! Well-structured stepper state.
The congregationCreateStepState atom is well-designed for managing the congregation creation workflow steps. The default value of 0 is appropriate for initializing at the first step.
src/components/icons/index.ts (1)
62-62: LGTM! Icon exports are properly implemented.
Both new exports follow the established patterns:
- Maintain alphabetical ordering
- Use consistent default export syntax
- Align with the file's organization
Also applies to: 191-191
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/index.tsx (4)
1-2: Imports are appropriate and necessary.
The imported modules from @mui/material and @hooks/index are correctly used in the component.
8-10: Correct usage of custom hooks for translations and state management.
The useAppTranslation and useCongregationCreate hooks are properly utilized to manage translations and retrieve the current steps.
13-21: Well-structured container layout with proper styling.
The Box component is suitably configured to create the desired layout with flex properties and spacing.
64-64: Ensure currentStep is within the bounds of the steps array before rendering the component.
Accessing {steps[currentStep].Component} without validating currentStep could lead to runtime errors if currentStep is out of bounds. Ensure that currentStep is a valid index within the steps array.
Run the following script to verify that currentStep does not exceed the length of steps:
| import { useSetRecoilState } from 'recoil'; | ||
| import { isAccountChooseState, isUserAccountCreatedState } from '@states/app'; | ||
|
|
||
| const useAccountChooser = () => { | ||
| const setIsAccountChoose = useSetRecoilState(isAccountChooseState); | ||
| const setIsUserAccountCreated = useSetRecoilState(isUserAccountCreatedState); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Migration to useSetRecoilState is incomplete - Found legacy imports
The codebase still contains direct imports of setIsAccountChoose from the old location @services/recoil/app in:
src/features/app_start/shared/startup/useStartup.tsxsrc/features/app_start/vip/signin/useSignin.tsx
These files need to be updated to use useSetRecoilState(isAccountChooseState) for consistency with the new pattern, as already implemented in other components like useTermsUse.tsx and useAccountChooser.tsx.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify state management changes across the application.
The switch to using useSetRecoilState hook directly is a good practice. However, let's verify that all components consuming these states are properly updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all components are properly using the new state atoms
# and there are no direct imports of the old setters
# Check for any remaining direct imports of setIsAccountChoose
rg "import.*setIsAccountChoose.*from.*@services/recoil/app"
# Check for usage of the new states to ensure consistent implementation
rg "isUserAccountCreatedState|isAccountChooseState" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 383
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search with proper file type handling
# Check for any usage of the state atoms
rg "isUserAccountCreatedState|isAccountChooseState" -t typescript -t tsx
# Check for components using useSetRecoilState with these atoms
rg "useSetRecoilState\(.*(?:isAccountChooseState|isUserAccountCreatedState)" -t typescript -t tsx
# Check for direct state setter imports from the old path
rg "import.*setIsAccountChoose.*from.*@services" -t typescript -t tsx
# Check the state definitions to understand the migration
rg "(?:isAccountChooseState|isUserAccountCreatedState).*=.*atom" -t typescript -t tsx
Length of output: 474
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search without explicit file type flags since rg's type detection seems unavailable
# Check for any usage of the state atoms
rg "isUserAccountCreatedState|isAccountChooseState"
# Check for components using useSetRecoilState with these atoms
rg "useSetRecoilState\(.*(?:isAccountChooseState|isUserAccountCreatedState)"
# Check for direct state setter imports from the old path
rg "import.*setIsAccountChoose"
# Check the state definitions
rg "(?:isAccountChooseState|isUserAccountCreatedState).*=.*atom"
Length of output: 3098
| @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ export const defaultNS = 'ui'; | |||
| const resources = {}; | |||
|
|
|||
| const getAppLang = () => { | |||
| const langStorage = localStorage.getItem('app_lang'); | |||
| const langStorage = localStorage.getItem('ui_lang'); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update remaining instance of 'app_lang' to 'ui_lang' for consistency
There is one remaining instance of the old 'app_lang' key in src/migration/action_steps/action_migrate/useSourcesMigrate.jsx that needs to be updated to use 'ui_lang' for consistency.
src/migration/action_steps/action_migrate/useSourcesMigrate.jsx: const lang = (localStorage.getItem('app_lang') || 'e').toUpperCase();
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistent usage of the new storage key.
Let's ensure the new 'ui_lang' key is used consistently across the codebase to prevent any potential issues with language settings.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of the old 'app_lang' key
# and verify consistent usage of the new 'ui_lang' key
echo "Checking for any remaining instances of the old 'app_lang' key..."
rg "app_lang"
echo -e "\nVerifying usage of the new 'ui_lang' key..."
rg "ui_lang"
Length of output: 1191
| localStorage.setItem('ui_lang', ui_lang); | ||
| localStorage.setItem('app_font', font); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Migration needed for local storage key change from 'app_lang' to 'ui_lang'
The search results confirm that both keys are being used in the codebase:
- The old key 'app_lang' is still used in
src/migration/action_steps/action_migrate/useSourcesMigrate.jsx - The new key 'ui_lang' is used in multiple locations including
src/states/app.tsandsrc/services/i18n/index.ts
The git history shows this is a recent change (commit 7884e95) that renames the key without migration logic. A migration strategy is necessary to prevent existing users from losing their language preferences.
- Add migration code in
src/features/language_switcher/useLanguage.tsxto handle the key transition - Update the remaining usage of 'app_lang' in
src/migration/action_steps/action_migrate/useSourcesMigrate.jsx
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify backward compatibility for local storage key change.
The local storage key has been renamed from 'app_lang' to 'ui_lang'. This change might affect existing users who have the language preference stored under the old key.
Let's check if there's a migration strategy in place:
Consider adding migration code to handle existing users:
if (cookiesConsent || accountType === 'pocket') {
+ // Migrate existing language preference
+ const oldLang = localStorage.getItem('app_lang');
+ if (oldLang) {
+ localStorage.setItem('ui_lang', oldLang);
+ localStorage.removeItem('app_lang');
+ }
localStorage.setItem('ui_lang', ui_lang);
localStorage.setItem('app_font', font);
}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for migration handling of the renamed local storage key
# Test 1: Look for any migration utilities or handlers
rg -g '!*.{lock,json,md}' -A 5 'app_lang.*localStorage'
# Test 2: Check for any migration-related code
rg -g '!*.{lock,json,md}' -A 5 'migration.*language'
Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the history and usage of localStorage keys
# Search for any localStorage operations related to language
rg -g '!*.{lock,json,md}' 'localStorage.*lang'
# Search for any language-related settings or configurations
rg -g '!*.{lock,json,md}' 'getItem.*lang'
# Check the history of this specific file for context
git log -p -- src/features/language_switcher/useLanguage.tsx
Length of output: 5843
| const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true); | ||
| const [isSetupCode, setIsSetupCode] = useState(true); | ||
| const [tmpMasterKey, setTmpMasterKey] = useState(''); | ||
| const [tmpMasterKeyVerify, setTmpMasterKeyVerify] = useState(''); | ||
| const [isLengthPassed, setIsLengthPassed] = useState(false); | ||
| const [isNumberPassed, setIsNumberPassed] = useState(false); | ||
| const [isLowerCasePassed, setIsLowerCasePassed] = useState(false); | ||
| const [isUpperCasePassed, setIsUpperCasePassed] = useState(false); | ||
| const [isSpecialSymbolPassed, setIsSpecialSymbolPassed] = useState(false); | ||
| const [isMatch, setIsMatch] = useState(false); | ||
| const [isProcessing, setIsProcessing] = useState(false); | ||
| const [congMasterKey, setCongMasterKey] = useState(''); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security concern: Weakened master key validation.
The removal of comprehensive validation checks (numbers, uppercase, lowercase, special characters) in favor of only length validation significantly weakens the master key strength requirements. While a 16-character minimum is good, without character complexity requirements, users might choose weaker passwords (e.g., "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa").
Consider reinstating or implementing alternative password strength validation to ensure master keys remain cryptographically strong. Example implementation:
const validateMasterKey = (key: string): boolean => {
return (
key.length >= 16 &&
/[0-9]/.test(key) &&
/[a-z]/.test(key) &&
/[A-Z]/.test(key) &&
/[^A-Za-z0-9]/.test(key)
);
};| encryptData, | ||
| generateKey, | ||
| } from '@services/encryption/index'; | ||
| import { decryptData } from '@services/encryption/index'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Encryption implementation uses standard AES but requires additional security measures
The implementation of decryptData reveals several security considerations:
- Uses CryptoES (crypto-es) library with AES encryption
- Lacks explicit configuration for encryption mode and key derivation
- No error handling for decryption failures
- Performs unsafe direct JSON parsing of decrypted data
Key recommendations:
- Add input validation and error handling for malformed data
- Implement proper key derivation function (KDF)
- Specify AES mode of operation (e.g., GCM, CBC with HMAC)
- Add integrity verification of decrypted data before parsing
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify encryption service implementation.
The encryption service is critical for security. Let's verify the implementation of decryptData.
Let me gather more information about the encryption implementation to ensure security best practices.
Let me check one more aspect regarding the encryption configuration and potential security parameters.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the encryption service implementation
# Expect: Strong encryption methods and proper key handling
# Search for the encryption service implementation
rg -A 10 "export.*decryptData" "src/services/encryption/"
Length of output: 739
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check imports and encryption library usage
rg -p "import.*CryptoES" "src/services/encryption/"
# Check for encryption configuration and key handling
rg -p "AES" "src/services/encryption/"
# Look for any test files that might reveal implementation details
fd -g "*encryption*.test.*" -x cat {}
Length of output: 377
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete encryption service file for configuration
cat src/services/encryption/index.ts
# Look for any encryption-related configuration files
fd -g "*crypto*.{ts,js,json}" -x cat {}
# Check for any security-related constants or configurations
rg -p "const.*{" "src/services/encryption/"
Length of output: 2619
| await displayOnboardingFeedback({ | ||
| title: t('tr_errorGeneric'), | ||
| message: getMessageByCode(err.message), | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure error handling does not expose sensitive information
The error object err may not always have a message property, and passing it directly to getMessageByCode might cause unexpected behavior or expose internal details. Consider providing a default error code or checking if err.message exists before passing it to getMessageByCode.
Apply this diff to handle errors safely:
await displayOnboardingFeedback({
title: t('tr_errorGeneric'),
- message: getMessageByCode(err.message),
+ message: getMessageByCode(err?.message || 'ERROR_UNKNOWN'),
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await displayOnboardingFeedback({ | |
| title: t('tr_errorGeneric'), | |
| message: getMessageByCode(err.message), | |
| }); | |
| await displayOnboardingFeedback({ | |
| title: t('tr_errorGeneric'), | |
| message: getMessageByCode(err?.message || 'ERROR_UNKNOWN'), | |
| }); |
| setCurrentStep(2); | ||
| } catch (err) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure 'isProcessing' state is reset after successful operation
The isProcessing state is set to true at the start of handleSetMasterKey and reset to false in error cases. However, after a successful operation, isProcessing remains true, which may cause the action button to remain disabled. Ensure to reset isProcessing to false after the operation completes successfully.
Apply this diff:
setCurrentStep(2);
+ setIsProcessing(false);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| setCurrentStep(2); | |
| } catch (err) { | |
| setCurrentStep(2); | |
| setIsProcessing(false); | |
| } catch (err) { |
| await dbAppSettingsUpdate({ | ||
| 'cong_settings.cong_master_key': tmpMasterKey, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid storing the master key in plaintext to enhance security
Storing the master key (tmpMasterKey) in plaintext within the application settings poses a significant security risk. It's recommended to avoid storing the master key or to store only a securely hashed version to prevent potential misuse.
Apply this diff to prevent storing the master key in plaintext:
- await dbAppSettingsUpdate({
- 'cong_settings.cong_master_key': tmpMasterKey,
- });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| if (status === 403) { | ||
| await userSignOut(); | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure isLoading is reset on all exit paths
In the error handling blocks for status === 403 (lines 114-117) and status === 404 (lines 120-123), the isLoading state is not set to false before returning. This may leave the application in a perpetual loading state if these conditions occur.
Apply this diff to reset isLoading before returning:
if (status === 403) {
await userSignOut();
+ setIsLoading(false);
return;
}
if (status === 404) {
await handleDeleteDatabase();
+ setIsLoading(false);
return;
}Also applies to: 120-123
| if (allowOpen) { | ||
| setIsSetup(false); | ||
| await loadApp(); | ||
| await runUpdater(); | ||
| setTimeout(() => { | ||
| setIsSetup(false); | ||
| setIsAppLoad(false); | ||
| }, 1000); | ||
|
|
||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
isLoading is not reset before return
In the if (allowOpen) block (lines 100-110), the isLoading state is not set to false before the function returns. This could result in the loading indicator remaining active indefinitely, causing a poor user experience.
Apply this diff to set isLoading to false before returning:
if (allowOpen) {
setIsSetup(false);
await loadApp();
await runUpdater();
setTimeout(() => {
setIsSetup(false);
setIsAppLoad(false);
+ setIsLoading(false);
}, 1000);
return;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (allowOpen) { | |
| setIsSetup(false); | |
| await loadApp(); | |
| await runUpdater(); | |
| setTimeout(() => { | |
| setIsSetup(false); | |
| setIsAppLoad(false); | |
| }, 1000); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (allowOpen) { | |
| setIsSetup(false); | |
| await loadApp(); | |
| await runUpdater(); | |
| setTimeout(() => { | |
| setIsSetup(false); | |
| setIsAppLoad(false); | |
| setIsLoading(false); | |
| }, 1000); | |
| return; | |
| } |
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider avoiding fixed delays with setTimeout
Using setTimeout with a fixed delay of 1000ms can lead to unreliable behavior if loadApp() or runUpdater() take longer or shorter than expected. This might cause setIsSetup(false) and setIsAppLoad(false) to execute at inappropriate times.
Refactor the code to eliminate the fixed delay:
if (allowOpen) {
setIsSetup(false);
await loadApp();
await runUpdater();
- setTimeout(() => {
- setIsSetup(false);
- setIsAppLoad(false);
- }, 1000);
+ setIsAppLoad(false);
+ setIsLoading(false);
return;
}Ensure that loadApp() and runUpdater() are properly awaited and that any necessary state updates occur after these asynchronous operations complete.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
organized-app
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
organized-app
|
| Branch Review |
main
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 00m 21s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Rasamoelina, Haja Onjatiana |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
1
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.130.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
No description provided.