App Hotfixes #3222
App Hotfixes #3222
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses multiple files across various features, focusing on TypeScript type refinements, UI component styling adjustments, and subtle logic modifications. The changes primarily involve simplifying type declarations, enhancing component interactions, and refining state management logic. Key areas of modification include styled components, report handling, assignment management, and user interface improvements. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for staging-organized ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
src/features/reports/publisher_records/years_stats/useYearsStats.tsx (2)
11-11: Fix typo in variable name.The variable name 'intial_value' contains a typo and should be 'initial_value'.
- const intial_value = useMemo(() => { + const initial_value = useMemo(() => {
Line range hint
1-31: Consider consolidating duplicate hook implementations.This hook appears to be duplicated in both
src/features/reports/publisher_records/years_stats/useYearsStats.tsxandsrc/features/reports/publisher_records_details/years_stats/useYearsStats.tsx. Consider extracting it to a shared location to avoid code duplication.Consider moving this hook to a shared location, such as:
+ src/features/reports/shared/hooks/useYearsStats.tsxsrc/features/reports/publisher_records_details/years_stats/useYearsStats.tsx (1)
11-11: Fix typo in variable name.The variable name 'intial_value' contains a typo and should be 'initial_value'.
- const intial_value = useMemo(() => { + const initial_value = useMemo(() => {src/features/reports/service_year_month_selector/month_selector/index.tsx (1)
22-22: Consider consolidating readOnly and disabled propsThe component uses both
readOnlyanddisabledprops with the same value. This is redundant and could lead to maintenance issues. Consider:
- Using only
disabledprop- Renaming
readOnlytodisabledthroughout the codebase- Documenting why both props are needed if they serve different purposes
src/components/assignments_checklist/assignments_checklist.styles.tsx (1)
Line range hint
4-49: Consider using a consistent type-safe pattern for styled componentsThe current approach of casting components as
unknownand then to their respective types might bypass TypeScript's type checking benefits. Consider using a more type-safe pattern:-export const HeaderBox = styled(Box)({ // ...styles -}) as unknown as typeof Box; +export const HeaderBox = styled(Box)<{ disabled?: boolean }>({ // ...styles +});This pattern would:
- Maintain type safety
- Make props explicitly visible in the component's type signature
- Enable better IDE support and type checking
src/components/timefield/index.tsx (1)
30-30: Consider accessibility implications of placeholder opacitySetting placeholder opacity to 1 might affect accessibility. Consider:
- Color contrast ratios between placeholder text and background
- Distinguishability between placeholder and actual value
Consider using MUI's built-in placeholder styling or ensuring WCAG compliance:
-'&::placeholder': { opacity: 1 }, +'&::placeholder': { + opacity: 1, + color: 'var(--accent-350)', +},src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/report_details/late_report/index.tsx (1)
23-56: Consider extracting warning box to a reusable componentThe warning box styling could be reused across the application. Consider extracting it into a reusable component.
Create a new component like
WarningBox:interface WarningBoxProps { message: string; icon?: React.ReactNode; } const WarningBox: React.FC<WarningBoxProps> = ({ message, icon = <IconInfo /> }) => ( <Box sx={{ borderRadius: 'var(--radius-xl)', padding: '16px', backgroundColor: 'var(--orange-secondary)', display: 'flex', gap: '8px', alignItems: 'center', }} > {icon} <Typography className="body-small-regular" color="var(--orange-dark)"> {message} </Typography> </Box> );src/components/select/index.tsx (1)
1-2: Consider using more specific imports for better tree-shaking.Instead of importing multiple components in one line, consider separate imports for better tree-shaking:
-import { FormControl, InputLabel, Theme } from '@mui/material'; +import FormControl from '@mui/material/FormControl'; +import InputLabel from '@mui/material/InputLabel'; +import type { Theme } from '@mui/material/styles';src/features/persons/assignment_group/useAssignmentGroup.tsx (1)
44-70: Consider simplifying complex MM assignment rulesThe mutual exclusion logic between
MM_AssistantOnlyand other MM assignments is complex and could be simplified for better maintainability.Consider extracting these checks into separate helper functions:
+const hasConflictingMMAssignments = (assignments: Assignment[]) => + assignments.some( + (record) => + (record.code >= AssignmentCode.MM_StartingConversation && + record.code <= AssignmentCode.MM_Discussion) || + record.code == AssignmentCode.MM_Talk + ); +const hasMMAssistantOnly = (assignments: Assignment[]) => + assignments.some( + (record) => record.code === AssignmentCode.MM_AssistantOnly + ); const checkAssignmentDisabled = (code: AssignmentCode) => { // ... if (code === AssignmentCode.MM_AssistantOnly) { - if ( - assignments.some( - (record) => - (record.code >= AssignmentCode.MM_StartingConversation && - record.code <= AssignmentCode.MM_Discussion) || - record.code == AssignmentCode.MM_Talk - ) - ) { + if (hasConflictingMMAssignments(assignments)) { return true; } }src/components/assignments_checklist/index.tsx (1)
121-121: Consider using standard opacity value formatThe opacity value
24%is unconventional. Consider using the decimal format0.24or rounding to0.25(25%) for consistency with standard practices.- opacity: disabled && '24%', + opacity: disabled ? 0.24 : 1,src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/index.tsx (1)
39-51: Consider optimizing tooltip performanceThe tooltip implementation is well-structured, but wrapping the entire Box component might cause unnecessary re-renders. Consider moving the tooltip to wrap only the Typography component where the exclusion status is most relevant.
- <Tooltip title={t('tr_reportExcluded')} followCursor show={not_publisher}> - <Box + <Box sx={{ padding: '2px 8px', display: 'flex', alignItems: 'center', justifyContent: 'space-between', gap: '16px', minHeight: '28px', }} onMouseEnter={handleHover} onMouseLeave={handleUnhover} - > + >Then wrap just the Typography component:
- <Typography + <Tooltip title={t('tr_reportExcluded')} followCursor show={not_publisher}> + <Typography className="h4" sx={{ color: isAhead || not_publisher ? 'var(--grey-300)' : 'var(--black)', }} > {monthname} - </Typography> + </Typography> + </Tooltip>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/locales/en/ministry.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
src/components/assignments_checklist/assignments_checklist.styles.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/assignments_checklist/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/select/index.styles.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/select/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/timefield/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/congregation/app_access/user_add/person_select/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/ministry/report/ministry_timer/add_time_dialog/useAddTimeDialog.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/ministry/report/ministry_timer/useMinistryTimer.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/ministry/report/report_form_dialog/service_time/useServiceTime.tsx(0 hunks)src/features/ministry/report/standard_editor/index.styles.ts(1 hunks)src/features/ministry/report/standard_editor/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/persons/assignment_group/useAssignmentGroup.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/persons/assignments/useAssignments.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/reminders/useReminders.tsx(2 hunks)src/features/reports/field_service/persons_list/usePersonsList.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/reports/publisher_records/years_stats/useYearsStats.tsx(2 hunks)src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx(4 hunks)src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/report_details/late_report/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/report_details/late_report/useLateReport.tsx(1 hunks)src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/years_stats/useYearsStats.tsx(2 hunks)src/features/reports/service_year_month_selector/month_selector/index.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/features/ministry/report/report_form_dialog/service_time/useServiceTime.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (21)
src/features/ministry/report/standard_editor/index.styles.ts (1)
25-25: Type assertion looks correct but verify type safety.
The type assertion ensures the styled component maintains the same type interface as the base TextField component. However, ensure that all TextField props are properly handled by the styled component to maintain type safety.
Let's verify the TextField component usage:
✅ Verification successful
Type assertion is safe and correctly implemented
The type assertion is appropriate because:
- The styled component only adds CSS customizations without modifying the component's behavior
- All TextField props are properly passed through to the base component
- The implementation correctly handles number input fields with proper type safety through TextFieldStandardProps
- The styling modifications are purely cosmetic (text alignment, spin button removal, border styling)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for TextFieldStandard usage to ensure proper prop passing
ast-grep --pattern 'TextFieldStandard $props={$$$}'
Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different pattern to find TextFieldStandard usage
rg "TextFieldStandard" -A 2 -B 2
# Also search for the styled component definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const TextFieldStandard = styled(TextField)`$$$`'
Length of output: 3346
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the TextFieldStandardProps type definition and usage
cat src/features/ministry/report/standard_editor/index.types.ts
# And check the actual implementation to see how props are handled
cat src/features/ministry/report/standard_editor/index.tsx
Length of output: 2146
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the base TextField component's implementation to verify prop types
cat src/components/textfield/index.tsx
# And check the styled component implementation
cat src/features/ministry/report/standard_editor/index.styles.ts
Length of output: 6904
src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/years_stats/useYearsStats.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-31: Duplicate implementation detected.
This is an identical implementation to the hook in src/features/reports/publisher_records/years_stats/useYearsStats.tsx. Please refer to the previous comment about consolidating these implementations into a shared location.
src/components/select/index.styles.tsx (1)
1-1: Verify the impact of changing the styled import source
The import source has changed from '@mui/system' to '@mui/material'. While this might work, it's a significant change for a hotfix.
src/components/assignments_checklist/assignments_checklist.styles.tsx (1)
4-9: Verify the disabled state handling across components
The HeaderBox no longer accepts the disabled prop directly. Ensure that the opacity styling for disabled states is properly handled in the parent component.
✅ Verification successful
Disabled state handling has been properly migrated
The opacity styling for disabled states has been correctly moved to the parent component in index.tsx, where it's applied directly through the sx prop: opacity: disabled && '24%'. This is a valid refactoring that moves the presentational logic closer to where the disabled prop is managed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for HeaderBox usage to verify disabled state handling
rg -A 5 "HeaderBox.*disabled" src/
Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the index.tsx file in the assignments_checklist directory
fd "index.tsx" "src/components/assignments_checklist"
# Then, let's check its content to see how disabled state is handled
rg -B 2 -A 5 "HeaderBox" "src/components/assignments_checklist"
# Also search for any opacity-related styling in the same component
rg "opacity" "src/components/assignments_checklist"
Length of output: 2660
src/components/timefield/index.tsx (1)
27-29: Verify color logic edge cases
The condition props.value.length === 0 || props.value === '0:00' might have edge cases:
- What happens with whitespace-only values?
- Should we trim the value before checking?
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the TimeField component's implementation and usage to verify the color logic edge cases.
Let me analyze the complete implementation to understand how the value prop is handled and validate the color logic edge cases.
Color logic is properly handled for edge cases
The current color logic condition is correct and handles edge cases appropriately because:
- Empty values are handled explicitly through
value.length === 0 - The default/initial state
'0:00'is handled separately - The
useTimeFieldhook ensures proper value formatting:- Empty values are converted to
''on blur - Input validation prevents whitespace-only values
- Value updates are strictly controlled through digit input and arrow controls
- Empty values are converted to
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for TimeField usage patterns and value handling
rg -A 5 "TimeField.*value=" src/
Length of output: 34
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for TimeField component usage with a broader pattern
rg -l "TimeField" src/
# Then search for value prop handling in the TimeField component
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
value?: $_
$$$
}' src/components/timefield/index.tsx
# Check TimeField component's value handling
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = ({value, $$$}: $_Props) => {
$$$
}' src/components/timefield/index.tsx
Length of output: 397
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the TimeField component's type definitions
cat src/components/timefield/index.types.ts
# Check the implementation of useTimeField hook
cat src/components/timefield/useTimeField.tsx
# Check the actual usage in hours editor
cat src/features/ministry/report/hours_editor/index.tsx
Length of output: 7902
src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/report_details/late_report/index.tsx (1)
24-40: Verify accessibility and translation of the warning message
The warning message UI looks good, but consider:
- Verify the translation key exists
- Ensure color contrast meets WCAG standards
- Consider adding aria-label for screen readers
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate the final response based on the verification results:
Warning message implementation meets requirements
The implementation looks good because:
- Translation key
tr_alreadySubmittedWarningexists across all language files with proper translations - The warning pattern with
IconInfoand orange colors is consistently used across similar warning messages in the codebase - Color contrast is maintained using the established
--orange-darkon--orange-secondarycombination - The warning is semantically structured using Typography component which preserves text accessibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if translation key exists
rg "tr_alreadySubmittedWarning" src/
# Search for similar warning patterns
rg -A 5 "IconInfo.*orange-dark" src/
Length of output: 9655
src/components/select/index.tsx (1)
13-13: Good accessibility improvement with disabled state handling!
The addition of proper disabled state handling and consistent color variables improves the component's accessibility and user experience.
Also applies to: 21-21
src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/report_details/late_report/useLateReport.tsx (1)
64-71: Clean addition of branch_submitted to return object.
The addition of branch_submitted to the return object is well-structured and maintains the existing functionality.
src/features/persons/assignment_group/useAssignmentGroup.tsx (4)
10-11: LGTM: State initialization is correctly positioned
The initialization of the person state using useRecoilValue is properly placed at the top level of the hook.
35-37: LGTM: Proper handling of deleted assignments
The filter ensures that deleted assignments don't affect the disabled state calculations.
93-93: LGTM: Cleaner gender-based restriction logic
The condition has been simplified while maintaining the same functionality.
16-18: Verify the bypass of publisher check for FR users
The new condition allows French users (isFR) to bypass the publisher check for the 'ministry' group. Please verify if this is the intended behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the ministry group and publisher checks.
Let me try a different approach to understand the context better.
Based on the comprehensive code analysis, I can now provide a final response about the FR-specific check in the ministry group.
The bypass of publisher check for FR users is the intended behavior
The code shows this is a deliberate design choice where:
- French Regular Pioneers (FR) are allowed to access the ministry group regardless of publisher status
- For non-FR users, the publisher check remains enforced
- This aligns with the broader codebase where FR users have special handling in ministry-related features, including ministry hours credit and reporting
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other FR-specific checks in the codebase
rg -A 3 "personIsFR" --type ts
Length of output: 2947
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the checkGroupDisabled function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'checkGroupDisabled($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Search for ministry group related code
rg -A 5 "ministry.*group" --type ts
Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of the useAssignmentGroup file to understand the complete implementation
cat src/features/persons/assignment_group/useAssignmentGroup.tsx
# Search for ministry-related code with a broader pattern
rg "ministry" --type ts -A 5
Length of output: 66113
src/features/reminders/useReminders.tsx (1)
11-11: LGTM: Improved role state management
The change from hook-based to Recoil state-based secretary role check is more consistent with the application's state management approach.
Also applies to: 20-20, 25-25
✅ Verification successful
The verification shows consistent usage of secretaryRoleState across the codebase. The selector is defined in states/settings.ts and is properly consumed using useRecoilValue in multiple components including useReminders, useSubmitReport, useUnverifiedReports, and useGlobal. Let me verify the complete implementation of the selector to ensure it's properly defined.
LGTM: Verified proper implementation and usage of secretary role state
The selector is correctly implemented using Recoil's selector pattern, deriving from congRoleState and consistently used with useRecoilValue across the codebase. The change aligns well with the application's state management approach.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify consistent usage of secretaryRoleState
rg -A 2 "secretaryRoleState" --type ts
Length of output: 2454
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of secretaryRoleState selector
ast-grep --pattern 'export const secretaryRoleState = selector({
$$$
})'
Length of output: 449
src/features/congregation/app_access/user_add/person_select/index.tsx (1)
91-91: LGTM: Improved accessibility with disabled state
Using disabled instead of readOnly is more semantic and provides better accessibility feedback to users.
src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/index.tsx (1)
115-121: Well-implemented read-only state handling
The implementation of the read-only state with visual feedback through both color and tooltip is well done.
src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx (1)
32-36: Well-structured memoization of report status
The implementation of branch_report_submitted, not_publisher, and report_locked is well-structured with appropriate memoization dependencies.
Also applies to: 65-71, 137-139
src/features/ministry/report/ministry_timer/useMinistryTimer.tsx (2)
Line range hint 91-112: LGTM! Improved time handling logic
The enhanced logic correctly:
- Preserves existing hours and minutes
- Handles minute overflow into hours
- Properly formats the time string with padded minutes
45-46: Verify timer state restoration edge cases
The simplified initial time calculation might overlook valid timer states. Consider adding test cases to verify that this simplification doesn't affect timer restoration in edge cases.
src/features/persons/assignments/useAssignments.tsx (1)
151-151: LGTM! Robust assignment toggle handling
The implementation correctly handles:
- Gender-specific assignment restrictions
- Assignment state management
- Add/update scenarios with proper timestamps
src/features/reports/field_service/persons_list/usePersonsList.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM! Clean state management setup
The implementation follows React/Recoil best practices for state management.
Also applies to: 10-10, 43-44
316-321: LGTM! Proper selection state cleanup
The effect correctly handles the cleanup of selected publisher state when the persons list becomes empty, preventing stale selections.
src/features/ministry/report/ministry_timer/add_time_dialog/useAddTimeDialog.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/features/reports/publisher_records_details/month_item/useMonthItem.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_members/useGroupMembers.tsx (1)
16-16: Consider memoizing handleInputChangeWhile the current implementation works correctly, consider memoizing the
handleInputChangefunction usinguseCallbackto prevent unnecessary re-renders of child components that receive this function as a prop.- const handleInputChange = (value: string) => setInputValue(value); + const handleInputChange = useCallback((value: string) => setInputValue(value), []);Also applies to: 84-85, 87-88
src/features/persons/speakers_catalog/my_congregation/speaker_edit/index.tsx (1)
121-135: Optimize filtering implementationWhile the filtering logic works correctly, here are some suggestions to improve performance and maintainability:
- Move the filtering logic outside the render function
- Memoize the filtered results
- Extract the string normalization logic
+ const normalizeString = (str: string) => str.toString().toLowerCase(); + + const filterTalks = useCallback((options: PublicTalkType[], inputValue: string) => { + const normalizedInput = normalizeString(inputValue); + return options.filter( + (record) => + normalizeString(record.talk_number).includes(normalizedInput) || + normalizeString(record.talk_title).includes(normalizedInput) + ); + }, []); return ( // ... <AutocompleteMultiple // ... - filterOptions={(options, params) => { - const inputValue = params.inputValue.toLowerCase(); - return options.filter((record) => { - const numberMatch = record.talk_number - .toString() - .includes(inputValue); - const titleMatch = record.talk_title - .toLowerCase() - .includes(inputValue); - return numberMatch || titleMatch; - }); - }} + filterOptions={(options, params) => filterTalks(options, params.inputValue)} // ... /> );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_members/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_members/useGroupMembers.tsx(3 hunks)src/features/persons/speakers_catalog/my_congregation/speaker_edit/index.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_members/index.tsx (1)
19-20: LGTM: Input handling enhancement
The addition of handleInputChange and inputValue props improves the Autocomplete component's input management, providing better control over the input state.
Also applies to: 52-53
|
organized-app
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
organized-app
|
| Branch Review |
main
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 00m 05s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | rhahao |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
1
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 3.4.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
No description provided.