-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multisig search #251
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Multisig search #251
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"Multisig" is a weird word 😁
Co-authored-by: Xavi Artigas <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Xavi Artigas <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we really need a searcher for multisig at all?
The search capability? it will help us at least with the state proof. We will be able to integrate over all mulsigi states and run the merkle proof. |
Not sure how it will help the merkle proof tbh. State proof should only take the multisig acount's address?? |
But how efficiently do you know all the multisig in the system? We have that way for all other entities but the multisig. |
No description provided.