[New] add types #603
[New] add types #603
Conversation
|
Are these hand written or generated from JSDoc ? It's unclear to me. Either way looks reasonable to me. |
|
Hand-written. |
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe update introduces comprehensive JSDoc type annotations across various JavaScript files to enhance type safety and documentation. This includes adjustments to function parameters and return types, new type definitions, and enhancements to existing logic, improving code clarity and robust type-checking during development. Changes
Sequence DiagramsNo sequence diagrams generated due to the nature of changes primarily adding type annotations and enhancing existing functionality. Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Files selected for processing (12)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
Additional context usedBiome
Additional comments not posted (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1 hunks)
- bin/import-or-require.js (1 hunks)
- bin/tape (2 hunks)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (8 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.js (2 hunks)
- lib/results.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/results.js (8 hunks)
- lib/test.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/test.js (42 hunks)
- test/common.js (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 43
lib/default_stream.d.ts (1)
- 1-5: The TypeScript declaration file for
defaultStreamcorrectly defines the function's return type asThroughStreamand uses the appropriate CommonJS export syntax. This enhances type safety and code clarity..github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1)
- 12-12: Adding
skip-ls-check: trueto the workflow configuration is a valid optimization that can potentially speed up the CI process by skipping unnecessary checks.bin/import-or-require.js (1)
- 7-7: The type annotation for the
importOrRequirefunction accurately specifies its parameter and return types, enhancing code readability and type safety.lib/default_stream.js (2)
- 6-6: The type annotation for the exported module correctly references its own declaration file, which is a good practice for maintaining consistency between the implementation and its TypeScript definitions.
- 18-28: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [12-25]
The refactoring of the
writefunction to handle different types of input buffers more explicitly improves the function's readability and robustness. The type annotation forbufasunknownand the subsequent type assertion are appropriate given the function's need to handle various input types.lib/results.d.ts (1)
- 1-54: The TypeScript declaration file for
Resultsaccurately defines the class's structure, methods, and related types. This addition significantly enhances type safety and code clarity, making it easier to work withResultsinstances and their associated data.index.d.ts (1)
- 1-72: The TypeScript declaration file for the
tapetesting library accurately defines the library's API, including test options, assert options, test cases, stream options, and the harness. This addition significantly enhances type safety and code clarity, making it easier to work with tests and their configurations.bin/tape (2)
- 98-98: The type annotation for the
importFilesfunction accurately specifies its parameter and return types, enhancing code readability and maintainability.- 108-108: The type annotation for the
filesPromisevariable clarifies its type as aPromise, which is appropriate given its role in handling asynchronous file imports. This enhances code readability and maintainability.test/common.js (4)
- 8-8: The type annotation for the
getDiagfunction accurately specifies its parameters and return type, enhancing code readability and maintainability.- 42-42: The type annotation for the
stripChangingDatafunction accurately specifies its parameter and return type, enhancing code readability and maintainability.- 67-67: The type annotation for the
stripFullStackfunction accurately specifies its parameter and return type, enhancing code readability and maintainability.- 103-103: The type annotation for the
runProgramfunction accurately specifies its parameters and return type, enhancing code readability and maintainability.index.js (7)
- 4-4: The addition of the
throughimport is appropriate for stream operations within this file, aligning with the changes made to introduce stream functionality.- 16-18: The type definitions (
Tape,Harness,HarnessConfig) provide clear and concise information about the types used within this file, enhancing code readability and maintainability.- 25-25: The
getHarnessfunction is correctly typed and provides a mechanism to lazily initialize the harness, which is a good practice for resource management.- 55-55: The
createStreamfunction is correctly typed and provides a clear interface for creating a stream, enhancing the library's functionality and usability.- 80-80: The
createHarnessfunction is well-documented and correctly typed, providing a foundational piece for creating test harnesses. This enhances the library's extensibility and usability.- 142-142: The
createExitHarnessfunction introduces a mechanism to handle process exit behavior, which is crucial for a testing library. The function is correctly typed and well-documented.- 204-207: The modifications to exports, including the workaround for circular exports, are necessary and correctly implemented to ensure the library's API is correctly exposed and usable.
lib/results.js (11)
- 21-22: The type aliases
StreamandResultprovide clear and concise information about the types used within this file, enhancing code readability and maintainability.- 24-24: The
coalesceWhiteSpacesfunction is correctly typed and provides a utility for string manipulation, which is useful for formatting output.- 29-29: The
getNextTestfunction is correctly typed and provides a mechanism for iterating over tests, which is crucial for running tests in sequence.- 45-45: The
invalidYamlfunction is correctly typed and provides a utility for YAML validation, which is useful for ensuring test result output is correctly formatted.- 50-50: The
encodeResultfunction is correctly typed and provides a mechanism for encoding test results into a TAP-compliant format, enhancing the library's compatibility with TAP consumers.- 102-105: The constructor documentation for
Resultsprovides clear information about the function's purpose and its parameters, enhancing code readability and maintainability.- 122-122: The
createStreammethod is correctly typed and provides a clear interface for creating a stream of test results, enhancing the library's functionality and usability.- 185-185: The
pushmethod is correctly typed and provides a mechanism for adding tests to the results, which is crucial for managing test execution.- 192-192: The
onlymethod is correctly typed and provides a mechanism for specifying a single test to run, which is useful for focused testing.- 197-197: The
_watchmethod is correctly typed and provides a mechanism for monitoring test execution, which is crucial for managing test results.- 233-233: The
closemethod is correctly typed and provides a mechanism for finalizing test results, which is crucial for ensuring test completion and outputting final results.lib/test.d.ts (4)
- 1-3: The imports at the beginning of the file are clear and concise, correctly importing only the types needed for this declaration file.
- 11-172: The
Testclass declaration and its method signatures are well-defined, providing clear type annotations for parameters and return types. This significantly improves the usability and type safety of theTestclass in TypeScript projects. However, there are a couple of minor issues to address:
- Line 9: There's an extra semicolon at the end of the import statement. While this is not a syntax error, it's unnecessary and should be removed for consistency and cleanliness.
- General: Ensure that all callback types (
Test.Callback) and option types (Options) are defined and correctly imported or declared within this file or its dependencies. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity and usability of the type declarations.- } from './results';; + } from './results';Please verify that all referenced types (
Test.Callback,Options, etc.) are correctly defined and accessible within this context.
- 174-220: The
Testnamespace provides additional type definitions that are essential for the detailed and specific typing of callback functions, call results, and other utility types used within theTestclass. This is a good practice as it encapsulates related types within the namespace of the class they support, enhancing modularity and readability.- 222-222: Exporting the
Testclass usingexport = Test;is appropriate for this module pattern and ensures compatibility with CommonJS imports. This is a good practice for TypeScript declaration files that correspond to JavaScript modules intended to be used in Node.js environments.lib/test.js (8)
- 15-15: The modification of the
ismodule import to useobject-is/polyfillinstead ofobject-isis a significant change that enhances compatibility across different environments by ensuring a consistent implementation of theObject.ismethod. This change is particularly important for environments that may not supportObject.isnatively.- 38-44: The
isErrorConstructorfunction and its type definition (IsErrorConstructor) are well-implemented, providing a robust way to check if a given constructor is one of the standard JavaScript error constructors. This is crucial for error handling and validation within theTestclass methods. However, there's a minor improvement that can be made for readability:
- Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
isErrorConstructorfunction and why there are two different implementations based on the environment. This will help future maintainers understand the rationale behind this design choice.Consider adding explanatory comments for the
isErrorConstructorfunction.
- 54-54: The
getTestArgsfunction is correctly annotated with a JSDoc comment, providing type information for its parameters and return type. This enhances code readability and helps TypeScript users understand the expected types, even though this is a JavaScript file. Good practice in maintaining type annotations in comments for JavaScript projects that may be used alongside TypeScript.- 108-128: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [125-141]
The
runmethod implementation correctly handles asynchronous test callbacks by supporting both synchronous and Promise-based asynchronous tests. This is a crucial feature for a testing framework, allowing users to write tests that perform asynchronous operations. However, there's a minor improvement that can be made for error handling:
- When handling Promise rejection, consider checking if
erris an instance of a specific error class (e.g.,AssertionError) to provide more detailed error messages or handling specific to assertion errors. This can improve the debugging experience for users.Consider enhancing error handling in the Promise rejection case by checking for specific error types.
- 166-170: The
testmethod correctly creates and manages child test instances, allowing for nested tests. This is a key feature for a testing framework, enabling complex test structures and hierarchies. The implementation is clear and follows best practices for event-driven programming with Node.js'EventEmitter. However, ensure that theTestclass and its methods are thoroughly tested, especially with nested tests, to prevent any potential issues with event handling or state management.Consider adding more comprehensive tests for the
testmethod, particularly focusing on nested tests and event handling.
- 191-194: The
commentmethod implementation is straightforward and correctly emits test result comments as events. This allows for flexible reporting and integration with test runners or other tools. It's a good practice to support comments in testing frameworks, as they can provide valuable context or explanations alongside test results.- 218-218: The
endmethod's implementation correctly handles error reporting and ensures that.end()is called only once per test instance. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of test results and preventing duplicate or misleading output. However, consider adding more explicit error handling or logging for cases where.end()is called multiple times, to aid in debugging such issues.Consider enhancing error handling for multiple calls to
.end()to improve debuggability.
- 231-231: The
teardownmethod provides a mechanism for registering teardown functions to be executed after a test completes. This is an essential feature for cleaning up resources or state between tests. The implementation is clear and follows best practices. However, ensure that teardown functions are always called, even if a test fails or times out, to prevent resource leaks or interference between tests.Verify that teardown functions are correctly executed in all scenarios, including test failures and timeouts.
ljharb
force-pushed
the
tsc
branch
2 times, most recently
from
54b4f2d
to
decd5d2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1 hunks)
- bin/import-or-require.js (1 hunks)
- bin/tape (2 hunks)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (8 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.js (2 hunks)
- lib/results.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/results.js (8 hunks)
- lib/test.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/test.js (41 hunks)
- test/common.js (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml
- bin/import-or-require.js
- bin/tape
- index.d.ts
- lib/default_stream.d.ts
- lib/results.d.ts
- lib/test.d.ts
- lib/test.js
Additional comments: 26
lib/default_stream.js (4)
- 6-6: Adding a type annotation for the module export is a good practice for clarity and type safety. This change enhances the maintainability of the code by making the expected type of the exported function explicit.
- 12-12: The type annotation for the
writefunction parameterbufasunknownis appropriate here since the function is designed to handle various types of input. This use ofunknownencourages type checking within the function, improving code safety.- 21-21: The casting of
buftostring | ArrayLike<number>is necessary given the subsequent operations onb. However, ensure that this casting aligns with the expected types ofbufthroughout the application to prevent runtime errors.- 22-25: The loop iterates over
b, handling both string andArrayLike<number>types. This approach is flexible but relies on the correct type casting ofbuf. Consider adding more explicit type checks or documentation to clarify the expected types ofbuffor future maintainability.test/common.js (5)
- 8-8: Adding type annotations for the
getDiagfunction improves code clarity by specifying the expected parameter types and return type. This change enhances maintainability by making the function's contract explicit.- 42-42: The type annotation for the
stripChangingDatafunction is clear and accurately describes the function's purpose and expected input/output. This addition aids in understanding the function's role in processing test output.- 67-67: The type annotation for the
stripFullStackfunction is a good practice, making the function's behavior and return type explicit. This change contributes to the overall maintainability and readability of the test utilities.- 103-103: The type annotation for the
runProgramfunction clearly defines the expected parameters and their types, as well as the callback's signature. This explicit typing is beneficial for maintainability and understanding the function's usage.- 5-11: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [111-111]
The concern regarding potential security issues with user input going into
path.joinorpath.resolvefunctions is noted. However, as this is a test file and the inputs are controlled within the test environment, the risk is minimal. It's important to remain vigilant about such patterns in production code.index.js (7)
- 16-18: The addition of type declarations for
Tape,Harness, andHarnessConfigis a significant improvement for type safety and code clarity. These declarations help developers understand the expected types and interfaces within the library.- 25-25: The
getHarnessfunction's type annotation enhances the function's readability by making the optional parameter and return type explicit. This change is beneficial for maintainability and type safety.- 35-35: The type annotation for the
lazyLoadfunction and its usage ofParameters<Tape>andReturnType<Tape>is a clever way to ensure type consistency with theTapeinterface. This approach maintains type safety across the library.- 55-55: The type annotation for the
createStreamfunction withinlazyLoadis clear and accurately describes the expected parameter and return type. This explicit typing aids in understanding the function's purpose and usage.- 80-80: The
createHarnessfunction's documentation and type annotations provide a clear understanding of its purpose and usage. This explicit typing and documentation are beneficial for maintainability and clarity.- 142-142: The
createExitHarnessfunction's type annotation and detailed implementation comments enhance the understanding of its purpose and behavior. This explicit typing and documentation contribute to the code's maintainability and clarity.- 204-207: The workaround for resolving circular exports by assigning
module.exportsto a variable and then modifying that variable is a practical solution to a common issue in JavaScript modules. However, ensure that this pattern is consistently understood and documented across the codebase to avoid confusion.lib/results.js (10)
- 21-22: The introduction of type aliases
StreamandResultis a significant improvement, enhancing code readability and maintainability by providing clear, reusable type definitions.- 24-24: The
coalesceWhiteSpacesfunction's type annotation is straightforward and accurately describes the function's behavior. This explicit typing is beneficial for understanding the function's purpose.- 29-29: The type annotation for the
getNextTestfunction clearly defines the expected parameter and return type, improving the function's readability and maintainability.- 45-45: The
invalidYamlfunction's type annotation is clear and accurately describes the function's expected input and output. This explicit typing aids in understanding the function's role in YAML validation.- 50-50: The
encodeResultfunction's type annotation and detailed implementation enhance the understanding of its purpose and behavior. This explicit typing and documentation contribute to the code's maintainability and clarity.- 102-105: The constructor documentation for
Resultsand the addition of type annotations for its parameters improve the class's readability and maintainability. This explicit typing and documentation are beneficial for understanding the class's purpose and usage.- 122-122: The type annotation for the
createStreammethod in theResultsclass clearly defines the expected parameter and return type, enhancing the method's readability and maintainability.- 185-185: The
pushmethod's type annotation in theResultsclass is straightforward and accurately describes the method's behavior. This explicit typing is beneficial for understanding the method's purpose.- 192-192: The
onlymethod's type annotation in theResultsclass is clear and accurately describes the method's expected input. This explicit typing aids in understanding the method's role in test execution.- 233-233: The
closemethod's type annotation in theResultsclass enhances the method's readability by making the expected behavior explicit. This change contributes to the overall maintainability and clarity of the class.
|
Thanks, I've updated the PR and gotten it down to 4 errors (i swear it was at zero when I put up the PR :-p) I'd love to get suggestions for those. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1 hunks)
- bin/import-or-require.js (1 hunks)
- bin/tape (2 hunks)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (8 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.js (2 hunks)
- lib/results.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/results.js (8 hunks)
- lib/test.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/test.js (41 hunks)
- test/common.js (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml
- bin/import-or-require.js
- bin/tape
- index.d.ts
- lib/default_stream.d.ts
- lib/results.d.ts
- lib/results.js
- lib/test.d.ts
- lib/test.js
Additional comments: 21
lib/default_stream.js (4)
- 6-6: The type annotation for the module export is correctly specified, enhancing type safety and clarity for consumers of this module.
- 18-28: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [12-25]
The
writefunction's type annotation forbufasunknownis appropriate, given the function's intent to handle various types of input. The explicit handling of different buffer types, including nullish values and strings, is well-implemented. However, consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind treatingObject(buf) !== bufas a condition to flush the buffer, as it might not be immediately clear to future maintainers.
- 21-21: Using a type assertion for
bas eitherstringorArrayLike<number>is a pragmatic approach to handle the two expected types of buffers. This assertion allows for type-safe operations within the loop that follows. Good use of type annotations to ensure type safety.- 3-15: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [47-47]
The use of
innerHTMLfor appending content, especially in a library context, can lead to XSS vulnerabilities. This concern was previously raised, and the justification was that it's for IE < 9 compatibility. While the explanation is valid, it's crucial to document this exception clearly in the code to inform future maintainers of the security implications and the specific use case. It appears that a comment regarding the use ofinnerHTMLfor IE < 9 compatibility is indeed present, albeit in a concise form. It's good practice to ensure such exceptions are well-documented.test/common.js (5)
- 8-8: The type annotation for
getDiagfunction is correctly specified, clearly indicating the function's parameters and return type. This enhances the readability and maintainability of the code.- 42-42: The type annotation for
stripChangingDatafunction is correctly specified. This function's purpose is well-documented through its type annotation, improving code clarity.- 67-67: The type annotation for
stripFullStackfunction is correctly specified, clearly indicating the function's parameter and return type. This addition aids in understanding the function's usage and expected behavior.- 103-103: The type annotation for
runProgramfunction is correctly specified, providing clear information about the function's parameters and return type. This enhances the function's readability and maintainability.- 5-11: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [111-111]
The concern regarding potential security issues with user input going into a
path.joinorpath.resolvefunction, which could lead to a path traversal vulnerability, has been addressed. It's noted that this is a test file, and there is no security concern here. It's good practice to be vigilant about potential security vulnerabilities, even in test environments, but in this case, the concern is not applicable.index.js (12)
- 4-4: The addition of the
throughmodule import is correctly implemented. This import is necessary for the functionality introduced in this file.- 16-22: The type definitions added for
Tape,Harness,HarnessConfig,TestOptions,HarnessEventHandler,CreateStream, andResultare correctly specified. These definitions enhance the code's readability and maintainability by providing clear type information.- 29-29: The
getHarnessfunction is correctly annotated with its return type. The comment about the override due to test failures via nyc is helpful for future maintainers to understand the rationale behind the current implementation.- 39-39: The
lazyLoadfunction's type annotation is correctly specified, enhancing the function's clarity by indicating the expected parameters and return type.- 59-59: The
createStreamfunction's type annotation is correctly specified, providing clear information about the function's parameters and return type. This addition aids in understanding the function's usage and expected behavior.- 84-84: The
createHarnessfunction's type annotation is correctly specified, enhancing the function's clarity by indicating the expected parameters and return type.- 91-91: The
testfunction's type annotation is correctly specified, providing clear information about the function's parameters and return type. This enhances the function's readability and maintainability.- 112-112: The
createStreammethod within thetestfunction is correctly annotated, enhancing clarity and maintainability by providing type information for the parameters and return type.- 117-117: The
onFinishmethod within thetestfunction is correctly annotated, providing clear type information that enhances the code's readability and maintainability.- 122-122: The
onFailuremethod within thetestfunction is correctly annotated, enhancing the code's clarity by providing type information for the parameters and return type.- 146-146: The
createExitHarnessfunction's type annotation is correctly specified, providing clear information about the function's parameters and return type. This enhances the function's readability and maintainability.- 208-211: The modifications to the module exports to resolve a circular export issue are correctly implemented. This hack is necessary due to TypeScript's limitations with circular exports, and it's good practice to document such workarounds for future maintainers.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 6
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1 hunks)
- bin/import-or-require.js (1 hunks)
- bin/tape (2 hunks)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (8 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.js (2 hunks)
- lib/results.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/results.js (9 hunks)
- lib/test.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/test.js (41 hunks)
- test/common.js (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml
- bin/import-or-require.js
- bin/tape
- index.d.ts
- lib/default_stream.d.ts
- lib/results.d.ts
- lib/results.js
- lib/test.d.ts
- lib/test.js
Additional comments: 3
lib/default_stream.js (2)
- 6-6: The addition of a type annotation for the module export is a good practice for clarity and type safety.
- 12-12: The type annotation for the
writefunction parameterbufasunknownis appropriate, considering the function's logic to handle various types of input. This ensures type safety while allowing flexibility in the input types.test/common.js (1)
- 8-10: The addition of type definitions via
@typedeffor external modules enhances the clarity and maintainability of the code by providing explicit type information. This is a good practice for projects that aim to improve type safety and documentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 4
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1 hunks)
- bin/import-or-require.js (1 hunks)
- bin/tape (2 hunks)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (8 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.js (2 hunks)
- lib/results.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/results.js (9 hunks)
- lib/test.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/test.js (41 hunks)
- test/common.js (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml
- bin/import-or-require.js
- bin/tape
- index.d.ts
- lib/default_stream.d.ts
- lib/results.d.ts
- lib/results.js
- lib/test.d.ts
- lib/test.js
Additional comments: 3
lib/default_stream.js (1)
- 6-6: The addition of type annotations enhances code clarity and TypeScript compatibility.
test/common.js (1)
- 11-11: The addition of type annotations for
getDiagenhances code clarity and TypeScript compatibility.index.js (1)
- 16-26: The addition of type definitions for various entities enhances code clarity and TypeScript compatibility.
| flush(); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| for (var i = 0; i < buf.length; i++) { | ||
| var c = typeof buf === 'string' | ||
| ? buf.charAt(i) | ||
| : String.fromCharCode(buf[i]); | ||
| var b = /** @type {string | ArrayLike<number>} */ (buf); // eslint-disable-line no-extra-parens | ||
| for (var i = 0; i < b.length; i++) { | ||
| var c = typeof b === 'string' | ||
| ? b.charAt(i) | ||
| : String.fromCharCode(b[i]); | ||
| if (c === '\n') { | ||
| flush(); | ||
| } else { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [12-25]
The casting of buf to string | ArrayLike<number> is sensible given the function's need to support both string and buffer inputs. However, ensure that this casting is safe by validating the input type before casting, as incorrect assumptions about the type can lead to runtime errors.
Consider adding explicit type checks before casting to ensure safety.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1 hunks)
- bin/import-or-require.js (1 hunks)
- bin/tape (2 hunks)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (8 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.js (2 hunks)
- lib/results.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/results.js (9 hunks)
- lib/test.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/test.js (41 hunks)
- test/common.js (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 47
lib/default_stream.d.ts (1)
- 1-5: The TypeScript definition for
defaultStreamis correctly implemented with appropriate use of type imports, declaration, and export syntax..github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1)
- 12-12: The addition of
skip-ls-check: trueto the workflow configuration is syntactically correct. Please ensure that skipping the ls check aligns with the project's CI/CD goals.bin/import-or-require.js (1)
- 7-7: The concise JSDoc type annotation for
importOrRequireis appropriate and correctly specifies the parameter and return types. The decision to use a less verbose annotation style aligns with previous discussions and preferences.lib/default_stream.js (2)
- 6-6: The type declaration for the module is correctly implemented, enhancing the code's readability and maintainability.
- 18-28: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [12-25]
The type annotations and logic within the
writefunction are correctly implemented. The handling of different types forbufand the subsequent processing are sound.lib/results.d.ts (1)
- 1-52: The TypeScript definitions in
lib/results.d.tsare correctly implemented, with well-defined class properties, methods, and additional type definitions within the namespace. The use of imports,declare, andexportsyntax aligns with TypeScript best practices.index.d.ts (1)
- 1-82: The comprehensive type definitions in
index.d.tsenhance the library's usability and clarity. The structure and organization of types, interfaces, and function overloads align well with TypeScript best practices. The approach respects the project's preferences regarding documentation and code separation.bin/tape (2)
- 98-98: The type annotation for the
importFilesfunction is correctly implemented, enhancing the clarity of the function's purpose and expected parameter type.- 108-108: The type annotation for the
filesPromisevariable is correctly implemented, clarifying the expected type and enhancing code maintainability.test/common.js (5)
- 8-9: The addition of typedefs for
ResultandSyncCallbackenhances the clarity and maintainability of the test utilities by providing clear type definitions.- 11-11: The type annotation for the
getDiagfunction is correctly implemented, providing clear documentation on the expected parameter types and return type.- 45-45: The type annotation for the
stripChangingDatafunction is correctly implemented, enhancing the readability and maintainability of the function.- 70-70: The type annotation for the
stripFullStackfunction is correctly implemented, providing clear documentation on the expected parameter type and return type.- 106-106: The type annotation for the
runProgramfunction is correctly implemented, enhancing the clarity of the function's purpose and expected parameter types.index.js (6)
- 11-12: The use of
/** @type {{ browser?: boolean }} */for type casting in the condition to check ifprocessis not running in a browser environment is a clever way to provide type information for TypeScript without changing the runtime behavior. However, ensure that this casting accurately reflects the expected properties of theprocessobject in all execution environments where this code might run.- 16-26: The addition of JSDoc type definitions (
@typedef) enhances the readability and maintainability of the code by providing clear type information for various entities used throughout the file. This is a good practice, especially in a dynamically typed language like JavaScript, as it aids in understanding the expected types of variables and function parameters/returns.- 1-36: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [33-43]
The
getHarnessfunction correctly checks if a harness has already been created and, if not, creates one usingcreateExitHarness. This lazy initialization pattern is efficient. However, consider adding error handling or logging within this function to catch and report potential issues during the harness creation process, especially sincecreateExitHarnessinvolves complex logic.
- 63-63: The
createStreammethod inlazyLoadis well-annotated with types, which improves code clarity. However, ensure that the fallback logic for whenharnessis not yet initialized (creating a new stream and getting the harness with specific options) is thoroughly tested, especially in concurrent scenarios where multiple streams might be created before the harness is initialized.- 87-87: The
createHarnessfunction is well-structured and makes good use of theResultsclass to manage test results. The handling of thetodoIsOKenvironment variable and the autoclose behavior based on configuration are clear examples of thoughtful design. However, consider documenting the rationale behind the decision to automatically close results in most cases but allow for disabling this behavior through configuration.- 211-214: The workaround for TypeScript's bug with circular exports is cleverly documented with a comment. This kind of documentation is crucial for maintainability and understanding the rationale behind certain code patterns that might otherwise seem unusual. Good job on ensuring this hack is well-explained.
lib/results.js (7)
- 28-28: The
coalesceWhiteSpacesfunction is a simple utility that replaces multiple whitespace characters with a single space. This is useful for normalizing strings before output. Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this function, as utility functions can sometimes be unclear to new contributors or when revisiting the code after some time.- 33-33: The
getNextTestfunction provides a mechanism to retrieve the next test to run, considering the_onlyproperty for focused testing. This logic is crucial for test runners that support.onlysyntax. Ensure that the handling of the_onlyproperty is thoroughly tested, especially in scenarios with nested tests or multiple.onlycalls across different test suites.- 49-49: The
invalidYamlfunction checks if a string contains characters that could be interpreted as YAML indicators. This is an important check for generating accurate TAP output. However, the nameinvalidYamlmight be slightly misleading as it checks for the presence of YAML indicators rather than validating YAML syntax. Consider renaming it to more accurately reflect its purpose, such ascontainsYamlIndicators.- 54-54: The
encodeResultfunction has been modified to handleactualStackdifferently. This change is crucial for providing more detailed error information in test results. Ensure that this modification is compatible with all expected input types forres.actualandres.error, and consider adding tests specifically for this logic to verify its behavior across different error scenarios.- 106-106: The
Resultsconstructor now accepts anoptionsparameter, which is used to configure thetodoIsOKproperty. This enhancement allows for more flexible configuration of test result handling. Ensure that the handling of theoptionsparameter is thoroughly tested, especially with regards to default values and edge cases whereoptionsmight be malformed or contain unexpected properties.- 126-126: The
createStreammethod inResults.prototypehas been enhanced to support both object mode and TAP output. This dual-mode functionality is a significant improvement for test result reporting. However, ensure that the transition between these modes is seamless and well-documented, especially for consumers of theResultsclass who may need to understand how to configure and interpret the output correctly.- 190-190: The
pushmethod inResults.prototypeis straightforward in adding a test to the internal tests array and emitting an_pushevent. This method is crucial for managing the queue of tests to run. Ensure that the interaction betweenpushand other parts of theResultsclass, such asgetNextTest, is well-understood and tested, particularly in scenarios with dynamic test addition or removal.lib/test.d.ts (5)
- 1-1: The inclusion of
EventEmitterandmockPropertytypes at the beginning of the file sets a clear foundation for theTestclass and related functionalities. This is a good practice as it ensures that all necessary types are available and correctly referenced throughout the file.- 13-13: The
Testclass declaration is comprehensive, covering various constructor signatures and properties. This thorough approach ensures that TypeScript can accurately type-check usage of theTestclass in different contexts. However, ensure that all properties and methods of theTestclass are covered, especially those that might be dynamically added or are part of the class's public API but not explicitly declared here.- 41-41: The method
captureFnand other utility methods likecapture,end, etc., are well-typed, providing clear signatures for their usage. This level of detail is crucial for developers to understand how to interact with theTestclass and its utilities. Ensure that the documentation or external resources are available to explain the purpose and usage of these utility methods, as their names alone may not be self-explanatory.- 58-58: The assertion methods (
ok,notOK,error, etc.) are correctly typed, reflecting their usage in theTestclass. This ensures that developers can rely on TypeScript for type checking when writing tests. Consider adding brief comments to these methods to explain their expected usage and any nuances in their behavior, especially for less commonly used assertions.- 185-185: The
Testnamespace declaration provides additional types and interfaces that are essential for advanced usage of theTestclass, such asSyncCallback,Callback, and various types related to method wrapping and interception. This is a good practice as it organizes related types and makes them easily accessible. Ensure that these types are used consistently throughout the project's TypeScript codebase to maintain type safety and clarity.lib/test.js (15)
- 38-44: The JSDoc type annotations added for various typedefs are a good practice for improving code clarity and maintainability. However, ensure that these typedefs accurately reflect the types used throughout the codebase and that they are consistent with the project's existing documentation and type definitions.
- 81-98: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [84-124]
The constructor for the
Testclass is well-documented with JSDoc comments, enhancing readability and maintainability. However, the dynamic binding of methods within the constructor usingcallBindis noted. Given the project's constraints (ES3 syntax and no TypeScript), this approach is suitable. To further improve clarity, consider adding a comment explaining why this dynamic binding approach is used, adhering to the guideline that comments should describe "why" or the history/motivation behind code decisions.
- 145-152: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [132-149]
The
runmethod's implementation to handle promises returned by the callback is a modern approach to asynchronous testing. However, ensure that this pattern is compatible with the environments where thetapelibrary is expected to run, considering the project's adherence to ES3 syntax.
- 173-177: Creating a new
Testinstance within thetestmethod and casting it toTestTypeis a clear way to manage test hierarchy. This approach allows for nested tests, contributing to the modularity and flexibility of the testing framework. Ensure that theTestTypeaccurately represents theTestclass's interface and capabilities.- 198-201: The
commentmethod's implementation to emit each line of a multi-line comment as a separate result is a thoughtful detail that enhances the readability of test output. This approach ensures that comments are clearly visible in the test results, aiding in test result interpretation.- 195-215: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [212-225]
The
timeoutAftermethod correctly implements a timeout mechanism for tests, which is crucial for identifying tests that may hang or take too long to complete. The use ofsafeSetTimeoutandsafeClearTimeoutis a good practice to ensure that the timeout functionality is reliable and does not interfere with other timers.
- 235-241: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [238-247]
The
teardownmethod provides a mechanism for cleaning up after tests, which is essential for maintaining a clean test environment and avoiding side effects between tests. This method enhances the framework's flexibility and usability by allowing test-specific teardown logic.
- 289-297: The
capturemethod's implementation to intercept and replace a method on an object with a wrapped function is a powerful feature for testing. It allows for detailed inspection of method calls, including arguments and return values. Ensure that this functionality is well-documented and that examples are provided to help users understand how to use it effectively.- 323-331: The
interceptmethod introduces a way to intercept property access and modification, which can be invaluable for testing code that interacts with objects in complex ways. This method's flexibility, including support for both data properties and accessor properties, enhances the testing framework's capabilities. Ensure that the documentation clearly explains the method's usage and the scenarios where it can be particularly useful.- 458-476: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [428-469]
The
_endmethod's implementation to handle the end of a test, including running teardown functions and emitting theendevent, is crucial for the correct functioning of the testing framework. The handling of asynchronous teardown functions with promises is a modern approach that increases the method's utility. However, ensure that this approach is consistent with the project's overall adherence to ES3 syntax and environments.Verification successful
The project consistently uses ES6+ features, including
Promiseandasync/await, across various parts of its codebase, including both test files and some core library files. Therefore, the implementation of asynchronous teardown functions using promises in the_endmethod aligns with the project's use of modern JavaScript features.* 482-488: > 📝 **NOTE** > This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [485-501]Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of ES6+ features like Promise in other parts of the project to ensure consistency. rg --type js "Promise"Length of output: 3134
The
_exitmethod's implementation to check for discrepancies between the planned number of assertions and the actual number of assertions at the end of a test is an important feature for ensuring test integrity. This method helps identify cases where tests may not be executing as expected, contributing to the robustness of the testing framework.
- 519-525: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [509-644]
The
_assertmethod is central to the testing framework, providing the mechanism for making assertions within tests. The detailed handling of assertion results, including capturing stack traces and handling errors, enhances the utility and usability of the framework. Ensure that the stack trace processing logic is robust and tested across different environments to provide consistent and helpful error reporting.
- 876-896: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [886-908]
The
throwsmethod's implementation to test if a function throws an error as expected is a key feature of the testing framework. The detailed handling of different types of expected errors, including support for validation objects, increases the method's flexibility. Ensure that the documentation clearly explains how to use this method effectively, including examples for different types of expected errors.
- 956-962: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [959-981]
The
doesNotThrowmethod complements thethrowsmethod by testing that a function does not throw an error. This method is important for testing the normal operation of code that should not produce errors under certain conditions. Ensure that the implementation is consistent with the framework's error handling and reporting practices.
- 1012-1018: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1015-1049]
The
matchanddoesNotMatchmethods provide a way to test if a string matches or does not match a regular expression. These methods enhance the framework's capabilities for testing string processing and pattern matching in code. Ensure that the error messages produced by these methods are clear and helpful for diagnosing test failures.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1 hunks)
- bin/import-or-require.js (1 hunks)
- bin/tape (2 hunks)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (8 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.js (2 hunks)
- lib/results.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/results.js (9 hunks)
- lib/test.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/test.js (41 hunks)
- test/common.js (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (11)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml
- bin/import-or-require.js
- bin/tape
- index.d.ts
- index.js
- lib/default_stream.d.ts
- lib/default_stream.js
- lib/results.d.ts
- lib/test.d.ts
- lib/test.js
- test/common.js
Additional comments: 9
lib/results.js (9)
- 21-27: The addition of type definitions (
Stream,Result,Test,ResultsType,StreamOptions,WritableStream) is a positive step towards improving code clarity and maintainability. These definitions will help developers understand the expected types of variables and function parameters/returns more clearly.- 18-36: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [33-48]
The
getNextTestfunction is well-implemented and serves a clear purpose within the context of managing test execution. The use ofvoid undefinedis appropriate here to explicitly returnundefined. Good job on typing and implementing this function.
- 49-53: The
invalidYamlfunction is a concise utility for detecting YAML-indicative characters. It's correctly implemented and typed. This function enhances the robustness of YAML-related operations by pre-validating strings.- 46-57: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [54-89]
The
encodeResultfunction has been modified to handleactualStackdifferently. This change improves error reporting by distinguishing between the stack of anactualvalue and an error's stack. Ensure that this differentiation is clearly documented in the function's comments to aid future maintainability.+ // Encodes a test result into a TAP-formatted string, handling actualStack and errorStack separately. function encodeResult(res, count, todoIsOK) {
- 103-112: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [106-125]
The
Resultsconstructor is well-defined, with clear options handling and initialization of properties. It's a good practice to document the expected properties of theoptionsparameter for better code readability and maintainability./** * @constructor * @param {{ todoIsOK?: boolean }} [options] - Options for Results instance. */ function Results(options) {
- 123-156: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [126-187]
The
createStreammethod added toResults.prototypeis comprehensive and well-implemented, covering both object mode and non-object mode streams. Ensure thorough testing, especially around the dynamic handling of tests and results in both modes, to prevent any potential issues with stream management.
- 190-196: The
pushmethod is a straightforward addition toResults.prototype, correctly managing test addition. It's well-implemented and typed.- 187-208: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [202-237]
The
_watchmethod is a key addition for monitoring test execution and formatting results. It's well-implemented, with clear handling of different test states. Consider adding more detailed comments explaining the logic, especially for the handling ofskipandtodostates, to improve readability.+ // Watches a test's lifecycle events to format and output results. Results.prototype._watch = function (t) {
- 232-247: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [238-259]
The
closemethod correctly finalizes the test results and ensures the stream is properly closed. It's important to handle theALREADY CLOSEDerror state as it does, preventing multiple close attempts. This method is well-implemented and typed.
|
Oop, sorry for taking so long - I'd added this tab on my phone and forgot about it 😅. Looking now!
On the latest commit I get no errors. So, nicely done! 😄 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You might consider also porting in the types tests from https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/blob/e1386bb7838c35504edfdb12876bf0d156d84a2a/types/tap/tap-tests.ts. Since the .d.ts is being hand-written rather than auto-generated from source files, it wouldn't be unheard of for it to fall out of sync.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if it were out of sync, wouldn't tsc fail?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not in all cases. If you, say, added an extra optional parameter somewhere but never used it, tsc wouldn't think to fail on it.
| Test.prototype['throws'] = function (fn, expected, msg, extra) { | ||
| if (typeof expected === 'string') { | ||
| msg = expected; | ||
| expected = undefined; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** @type {undefined | { error: unknown | Error }} */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
error: unknown | Error is equivalent to error: unknown. unknown is a top type indicating it could be anything in the world, including Error. plugin:@typescript-eslint/no-redundant-type-constituents
The code later on just checks if (caught.error && typeof caught.error === 'object'), not instanceof Error or an equivalent. So if a caught.error is a non-Error object, the assumption it could be an Error would be wrong.
Can caught.error be something other than Error? If so, what?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
technically line 897 doesn't ensure it's an Error, but if that branch is entered, then it's so Error-like as to not make a difference. there doesn't seem to be any way i can do a type assertion without runtime code :-/
| // TS TODO: `caught.error` and `expected` should both be `object` here | ||
| passed = every(keys, /** @type {(key: PropertyKey) => boolean} */ function (key) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately, TypeScript doesn't have a way of being informed that every's callbacks should keep narrowing. A type assertion would be the appropriate thing to do here instead of // @ts-expect-error to avoid changing runtime code.
A small runtime change could be to store error and expected as variables after narrowing them.
Alternately, the next version of TypeScript might be nicer about preserving narrowings - I haven't tried.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i'm using next, so it doesn't help me here. this isn't TS-expect-error tho; it's just a TODO comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I meant the // @ts-expect-errors later.
ljharb
force-pushed
the
master
branch
3 times, most recently
from
c16dde3
to
2ad86d4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lib/test.js (1)
Line range hint
83-128:
Well-annotatedTestclass constructor.The type annotations improve readability and maintainability. The dynamic method binding approach is appropriate given the project's constraints.
Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind the dynamic method binding to help future maintainers.
Do you want me to add a comment explaining the rationale behind this choice?
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1 hunks)
- bin/import-or-require.js (1 hunks)
- bin/tape (2 hunks)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (8 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.js (2 hunks)
- lib/results.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/results.js (9 hunks)
- lib/test.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/test.js (41 hunks)
- test/common.js (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml
- bin/import-or-require.js
- lib/default_stream.d.ts
Additional context used
Learnings (3)
test/common.js (1)
Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: test/common.js:106-106 Timestamp: 2024-03-12T04:16:16.696Z Learning: Code within the `test/` directory is considered test code and is not subject to the same security concerns as production code, as it does not handle user input.index.js (1)
Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: index.js:147-147 Timestamp: 2024-03-12T04:35:01.528Z Learning: Comments in the codebase should focus on explaining "why" or providing history/motivation, rather than detailing "what" the code does, as per ljharb's guidance.lib/results.js (2)
Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: lib/results.js:197-201 Timestamp: 2024-03-22T05:25:05.727Z Learning: For the `tape` project, code comments should explain "why" or history/motivation, but never "what". Documentation belongs outside of source files.Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: index.js:147-147 Timestamp: 2024-03-12T04:35:01.528Z Learning: Comments in the codebase should focus on explaining "why" or providing history/motivation, rather than detailing "what" the code does, as per ljharb's guidance.
Biome
lib/default_stream.js
[error] 22-22: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 23-25: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
index.js
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
[error] 134-134: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
lib/results.js
[error] 92-92: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
lib/test.d.ts
[error] 116-116: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 130-130: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 196-196: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 202-202: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
lib/test.js
[error] 150-150: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 264-267: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 363-363: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 365-369: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 388-388: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 391-391: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 900-900: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
Additional comments not posted (42)
lib/default_stream.js (2)
6-6: Type annotation for module export looks good.The type annotation correctly specifies the import type.
12-12: Type annotation forwritefunction parameter looks good.The type annotation correctly specifies the parameter type.
lib/results.d.ts (4)
1-2: Type imports look good.The type imports correctly specify the required types.
4-6: Type imports look good.The type imports correctly specify the required types.
7-28: Type declarations forResultsclass look good.The type declarations correctly specify the class properties and methods.
30-50: Type declarations forResultsnamespace look good.The type declarations correctly specify the namespace types.
index.d.ts (4)
1-2: Type import forThroughStreamlooks good.The type import correctly specifies the required type.
3-4: Type imports forTestandResultslook good.The type imports correctly specify the required types.
6-13: Type declarations forharnessFunctionlook good.The type declarations correctly specify the function overloads.
14-82: Type declarations for interfaces, functions, and namespaces look good.The type declarations correctly specify the required types and interfaces.
bin/tape (2)
98-98: Type annotation forimportFilesfunction looks good.The type annotation correctly specifies the function's return type.
108-108: Type annotation forfilesPromisevariable looks good.The type annotation correctly specifies the variable's type.
test/common.js (6)
8-9: Type annotations are correct.The type annotations for
ResultandSyncCallbackare correctly added and provide clarity.
Line range hint
11-24: FunctiongetDiagimplementation is correct.The function correctly extracts and processes YAML diagnostic information from a string.
Line range hint
45-68: FunctionstripChangingDataimplementation is correct.The function correctly normalizes stack trace data for consistency.
Line range hint
70-85: FunctionstripFullStackimplementation is correct.The function correctly processes stack traces to remove unnecessary information.
Line range hint
115-132: FunctionrunProgramimplementation is correct.The function correctly runs a specified program and captures its output.
Line range hint
134-141: FunctionstripDeprecationsimplementation is correct.The function correctly removes deprecation warnings from a message string.
index.js (5)
16-26: Type annotations are correct.The type annotations for various types such as
Tape,Harness,HarnessConfig, etc., are correctly added and provide clarity.
Line range hint
33-41: FunctiongetHarnessimplementation is correct.The function correctly retrieves or creates a test harness.
Tools
Biome
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
Line range hint
43-86: FunctionlazyLoadimplementation is correct.The function correctly lazily loads the test harness and provides various utility methods.
Line range hint
87-147: FunctioncreateHarnessimplementation is correct.The function correctly creates a test harness and sets up result handling.
Tools
Biome
[error] 134-134: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Line range hint
148-209: FunctioncreateExitHarnessimplementation is correct.The function correctly creates a test harness that handles exit conditions.
lib/results.js (6)
21-26: Type annotations are correct.The type annotations for
Stream,Result,Test,ResultsType,StreamOptions, andWritableStreamare correctly added and provide clarity.
28-32: FunctioncoalesceWhiteSpacesimplementation is correct.The function correctly normalizes whitespace in strings.
Line range hint
33-48: FunctiongetNextTestimplementation is correct.The function correctly retrieves the next test to be run.
49-53: FunctioninvalidYamlimplementation is correct.The function correctly checks if a string contains YAML indicators.
Line range hint
54-105: FunctionencodeResultimplementation is correct.The function correctly encodes a test result into a string.
Tools
Biome
[error] 92-92: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Line range hint
106-253: ClassResultsand its methods implementation is correct.The class and its methods are correctly typed and implemented, providing the necessary functionalities.
lib/test.d.ts (4)
1-12: Type annotations for imports are correct.The type annotations for various imports such as
EventEmitter,mockProperty, etc., are correctly added and provide clarity.
22-39: Type annotations forTestclass properties are correct.The type annotations for the properties of the
Testclass are correctly added and provide clarity.
41-187: Type annotations forTestclass methods are correct.The type annotations for the methods of the
Testclass are correctly added and provide clarity.Tools
Biome
[error] 116-116: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 130-130: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
190-236: Type annotations forTestnamespace are correct.The type annotations for the
Testnamespace are correctly added and provide clarity.Tools
Biome
[error] 196-196: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 202-202: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
lib/test.js (9)
38-45: Good use of JSDoc typedefs.These typedefs enhance type safety and documentation.
47-50: Appropriate type annotation forisErrorConstructor.The type annotation improves clarity and the function handles different environments correctly.
60-61: Clear type annotation forgetTestArgs.The type annotation enhances documentation and ensures the return type is clear.
131-134: Clear type annotation forrunmethod.The type annotations improve documentation and ensure the types of parameters and return values are clear.
147-148: Appropriate type annotation forcallbackReturn.The type annotation ensures clarity in understanding the flow of the method.
172-176: Clear type annotation fortestmethod.The type annotations improve documentation and ensure the types of parameters and return values are clear.
197-200: Clear type annotation forcommentmethod.The type annotations improve documentation and ensure the types of parameters and return values are clear.
246-260: Clear type annotation forwrapFunction.The type annotation enhances documentation and ensures the types of parameters and return values are clear.
298-298: Appropriate type annotation forimplementationvariable.The type annotation ensures clarity in understanding the flow of the method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsontsconfig.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml (1 hunks)
- bin/import-or-require.js (1 hunks)
- bin/tape (2 hunks)
- index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (8 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/default_stream.js (2 hunks)
- lib/results.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/results.js (9 hunks)
- lib/test.d.ts (1 hunks)
- lib/test.js (41 hunks)
- test/common.js (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- .github/workflows/node-aught.yml
- bin/import-or-require.js
- bin/tape
- index.d.ts
- lib/default_stream.d.ts
- lib/results.d.ts
- test/common.js
Additional context used
Learnings (3)
lib/default_stream.js (3)
Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: lib/default_stream.js:23-25 Timestamp: 2024-07-05T21:18:22.587Z Learning: The modern JavaScript practice favors defining variables where they are first needed, rather than declaring all `var`s at the top of the function. This approach improves readability and maintainability.Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: lib/default_stream.js:21-21 Timestamp: 2024-07-05T21:17:37.138Z Learning: Avoid suggesting moving variable declarations to the root of the containing function if it affects the type definition and the scope of the variable.Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: lib/default_stream.js:23-25 Timestamp: 2024-07-05T21:12:23.639Z Learning: The linting rule regarding inner declarations in Biome is subjective and not agreed upon by ljharb. Future suggestions should consider this perspective.index.js (1)
Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: index.js:147-147 Timestamp: 2024-03-12T04:35:01.528Z Learning: Comments in the codebase should focus on explaining "why" or providing history/motivation, rather than detailing "what" the code does, as per ljharb's guidance.lib/results.js (2)
Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: lib/results.js:197-201 Timestamp: 2024-03-22T05:25:05.727Z Learning: For the `tape` project, code comments should explain "why" or history/motivation, but never "what". Documentation belongs outside of source files.Learnt from: ljharb PR: tape-testing/tape#603 File: index.js:147-147 Timestamp: 2024-03-12T04:35:01.528Z Learning: Comments in the codebase should focus on explaining "why" or providing history/motivation, rather than detailing "what" the code does, as per ljharb's guidance.
Biome
lib/default_stream.js
[error] 22-22: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 23-25: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
index.js
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
[error] 133-133: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
lib/results.js
[error] 92-92: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
lib/test.d.ts
[error] 112-112: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 126-126: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 192-192: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 198-198: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
lib/test.js
[error] 150-150: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 264-267: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 363-363: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 365-369: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 388-388: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 391-391: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 900-900: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
Additional comments not posted (39)
lib/default_stream.js (4)
6-6: LGTM!The type annotation for the module export improves clarity.
12-12: LGTM!The type annotation for the
writefunction improves clarity.
21-21: LGTM!The type annotation for the variable
bensures type safety.
23-25: LGTM!The type annotation for the variable
censures type safety.Tools
Biome
[error] 23-25: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
index.js (5)
4-5: LGTM!The import statement for the
throughmodule is necessary for the functionality of the file.
11-12: LGTM!The type annotation for the
canEmitExitvariable improves clarity.
16-26: LGTM!The type annotations for the typedefs improve clarity and type safety.
29-29: LGTM!The type annotation for the
harnessvariable ensures type safety.
32-35: LGTM!The type annotation for the
getHarnessfunction improves clarity and type safety.lib/results.js (5)
21-27: LGTM!The type annotations for the typedefs improve clarity and type safety.
28-32: LGTM!The type annotation for the
coalesceWhiteSpacesfunction improves clarity and type safety.
Line range hint
33-48:
LGTM!The type annotation for the
getNextTestfunction improves clarity and type safety.
49-53: LGTM!The type annotation for the
invalidYamlfunction improves clarity and type safety.
Line range hint
54-105:
LGTM!The type annotation for the
encodeResultfunction improves clarity and type safety.Tools
Biome
[error] 92-92: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
lib/test.d.ts (5)
1-3: LGTM!The import type statements for various modules improve type safety and clarity.
4-11: LGTM!The import type statements for various typedefs improve type safety and clarity.
12-17: LGTM!The constructor overloads for the
Testclass provide flexibility in creatingTestinstances.
37-51: LGTM!The type annotations for the methods in the
Testclass improve clarity and type safety.
153-157: LGTM!The type annotation for the
assertionmethod improves clarity and type safety.lib/test.js (20)
38-45: Type definitions and helper functions look good!The added type definitions and helper functions are well-structured and align with the project's use of the TypeScript compiler for type checking.
Line range hint
60-74: Type annotations forgetTestArgslook good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the function's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
83-130: Constructor forTestclass looks good!The constructor is well-implemented, correctly initializing class properties and handling default values. Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind the dynamic method binding approach to help future maintainers understand the choice.
for (var prop in this) { if (typeof this[prop] === 'function') { // Dynamically bind methods to the instance to avoid listing each method explicitly // @ts-expect-error TODO: FIXME this[prop] = callBind(this[prop], this); } }
Line range hint
131-170: Type annotations forrunmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Tools
Biome
[error] 150-150: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
Line range hint
172-195: Type annotations fortestmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
197-203: Type annotations forcommentmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
205-209: Type annotations forplanmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
211-222: Type annotations fortimeoutAftermethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
224-235: Type annotations forendmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
237-244: Type annotations forteardownmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
246-288: Type annotations forwrapFunctionlook good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the function's parameters and return type. However, consider refactoring variable declarations to the root of the function to avoid confusion.
function wrapFunction(original) { if (typeof original !== 'undefined' && typeof original !== 'function') { throw new TypeError('`original` must be a function or `undefined`'); } var bound = original && callBind.apply(original); /** @type {WrappedCall[]} */ var calls = []; /** @type {import('./test').WrapObject<NonNullable<typeof original>>} */ var wrapObject = { __proto__: null, wrapped: /** @type {() => ReturnType<original>} */ function wrapped() { var args = $slice(arguments); var completed = false; try { var returned = bound ? bound(this, /** @type {readonly[]} */ (/** @type {unknown} */ (arguments))) : void undefined; $push(calls, { args: args, receiver: this, returned: returned }); completed = true; return returned; } finally { if (!completed) { $push(calls, { args: args, receiver: this, threw: true }); } } }, calls: calls, results: function results() { try { return calls; } finally { calls = []; wrapObject.calls = calls; } } }; return wrapObject; }Tools
Biome
[error] 264-267: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
Line range hint
290-311: Type annotations forcapturemethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
313-321: Type annotations forcaptureFnmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
324-430: Type annotations forinterceptmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type. However, consider refactoring variable declarations to the root of the function to avoid confusion.
function intercept(obj, property) { if (!obj || (typeof obj !== 'object' && typeof obj !== 'function')) { throw new TypeError('`obj` must be an object'); } if (typeof property !== 'string' && typeof property !== 'symbol') { throw new TypeError('`property` must be a string or a symbol'); } /** @type {PropertyDescriptor} */ var desc = arguments.length > 2 ? arguments[2] : { __proto__: null }; if (typeof desc !== 'undefined' && (!desc || typeof desc !== 'object')) { throw new TypeError('`desc`, if provided, must be an object'); } if ('configurable' in desc && !desc.configurable) { throw new TypeError('`desc.configurable`, if provided, must be `true`, so that the interception can be restored later'); } var isData = 'writable' in desc || 'value' in desc; var isAccessor = 'get' in desc || 'set' in desc; if (isData && isAccessor) { throw new TypeError('`value` and `writable` can not be mixed with `get` and `set`'); } var strictMode = arguments.length > 3 ? arguments[3] : true; if (typeof strictMode !== 'boolean') { throw new TypeError('`strictMode`, if provided, must be a boolean'); } /** @type {Call[]} */ var calls = []; var getter = desc.get && callBind.apply(desc.get); var setter = desc.set && callBind.apply(desc.set); var value = !isAccessor ? desc.value : void undefined; var writable = !!desc.writable; /** @type {<T = unknown>(this: T, ...args: unknown[]) => unknown} */ function getInterceptor() { /** @type {unknown[]} */ var args = $slice(arguments); if (isAccessor) { if (getter) { var completed = false; try { var returned = getter( this, /** @type {readonly []} */ (/** @type {unknown} */ (arguments)) ); completed = true; $push(calls, { type: 'get', success: true, value: returned, args: args, receiver: this }); return returned; } finally { if (!completed) { $push(calls, { type: 'get', success: false, threw: true, args: args, receiver: this }); } } } } $push(calls, { type: 'get', success: true, value: value, args: args, receiver: this }); return value; } /** @type {<T = unknown>(this: T, v: unknown) => unknown} */ function setInterceptor(v) { var args = $slice(arguments); if (isAccessor && setter) { var completed = false; try { var returned = setter(this, /** @type {readonly [v: unknown]} */ (/** @type {unknown} */ (arguments))); completed = true; $push(calls, { type: 'set', success: true, value: v, args: args, receiver: this }); return returned; } finally { if (!completed) { $push(calls, { type: 'set', success: false, threw: true, args: args, receiver: this }); } } } var canSet = isAccessor || writable; if (canSet) { value = v; } $push(calls, { type: 'set', success: !!canSet, value: value, args: args, receiver: this }); if (!canSet && strictMode) { throw new TypeError('Cannot assign to read only property `' + inspect(property) + '` of object `' + inspect(obj) + '`'); } return value; } var restore = mockProperty(obj, property, { nonEnumerable: !!desc.enumerable, get: getInterceptor, set: setInterceptor }); this.teardown(restore); function results() { try { return calls; } finally { calls = []; } } results.restore = restore; return results; }Tools
Biome
[error] 363-363: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
[error] 365-369: This var should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.
The var is accessible in the whole body of the enclosing function.
To avoid confusion, it should be declared at the root of the enclosing function.(lint/correctness/noInnerDeclarations)
Line range hint
432-487: Type annotations for_endmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
489-502: Type annotations for_exitmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
505-511: Type annotations for_pendingAssertsmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
513-651: Type annotations for_assertmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
653-660: Type annotations forfailmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
Line range hint
662-669: Type annotations forpassmethod look good!The type annotations improve the clarity of the method's parameters and return type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
lib/test.d.ts (1)
13-16: Potential mismatch in constructor usageThe constructor call
new Test(name, conf, cb);does not match any of the defined overloads in theTestclass. Please review this instance to ensure it aligns with the intended overloads.
- File:
index.js- Line:
var t = new Test(name, conf, cb);Analysis chain
Constructor overloads are appropriate.
The current constructor overloads provide necessary flexibility and should be maintained as is.
However, ensure that all constructor calls in the codebase match these overloads.
Run the following script to verify the constructor usage:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all constructor calls to `Test` match the defined overloads. # Test: Search for the constructor usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the defined overloads. rg --type js -A 5 $'new Test'Length of output: 988
lib/test.js (3)
60-60: Clarify the return type annotation forgetTestArgs.The return type annotation could be more explicit about the optional nature of
cb.Apply this diff for clarity:
- /** @type {(name_: string, opts_: TestOptions, cb_: Callback) => { name: string, opts: TestOptions, cb: Callback }} */ + /** @type {(name_: string, opts_: TestOptions, cb_: Callback) => { name: string, opts: TestOptions, cb?: Callback }} */
246-246: Improve type annotations forwrapFunction.The type annotations could be more explicit for clarity.
Apply this diff for clarity:
- /** @type {<T extends Callback>(original: undefined | T) => import('./test').WrapObject<T>} */ + /** @type {<T extends Callback | undefined>(original: T) => import('./test').WrapObject<NonNullable<T>>} */
985-985: Improve type annotations formatch.The type annotations could be more explicit for clarity.
Apply this diff for clarity:
- /** @type {import('./test').prototype.match} */ + /** @type {(string: string, regexp: RegExp, msg?: string, extra?: unknown) => void} */
Normally I'd just push this commit up and publish it, but since
@types/tapealready exists, I thought this was worth a PR so others can double check me.