feat!: add sidechain eviction proof transaction #6702
Draft
+4,438
−1,528
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sdbondi
force-pushed
the
core-validator-evict
branch
from
d4c5d5a
to
2821268
Compare
Test Results (CI)698 tests 697 ✅ 9m 52s ⏱️ For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 995b587. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Test Results (Integration tests) 2 files 11 suites 23m 30s ⏱️ For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 995b587. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
sdbondi
force-pushed
the
core-validator-evict
branch
from
950af9a
to
fe794be
Compare
sdbondi
force-pushed
the
core-validator-evict
branch
from
fe794be
to
680f4f6
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
sidechain eviction proof transaction
validations for eviction proof
only single validator node registration permitted
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
What process can a PR reviewer use to test or verify this change?
Breaking Changes