Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(windows): properly resolve custom protocol with threaded resolver #1023

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

lucasfernog
Copy link
Member

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Docs
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Checklist

  • This PR will resolve #___
  • A change file is added if any packages will require a version bump due to this PR per the instructions in the readme.
  • I have added a convincing reason for adding this feature, if necessary
  • It can be built on all targets and pass CI/CD.

Other information

Needs tauri-apps/tao#792

@lucasfernog lucasfernog requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2023 00:23
@wusyong
Copy link
Member

wusyong commented Sep 11, 2023

Can it be achieved without patch from tao? We have to work with winit as well.

@lucasfernog
Copy link
Member Author

I've implemented the messaging logic manually. Let me know what you think @wusyong @amrbashir

amrbashir
amrbashir previously approved these changes Sep 11, 2023
@amrbashir amrbashir merged commit 844d95a into dev Sep 11, 2023
@amrbashir amrbashir deleted the fix/windows-async-protocol branch September 11, 2023 12:55
lucasfernog added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
…#1023)

* fix(windows): properly resolve custom protocol with threaded resolver

* revert example

* implement messaging manually

* reuse the existing window procedure

* fix change file [skip ci]

---------

Co-authored-by: amrbashir <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants