Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(repository): introduce search for layers by layerName parameter #929

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

ahennr
Copy link
Member

@ahennr ahennr commented Oct 9, 2024

Description

This PR introduces two new methods for querying layer by layerName parameter (first result and all results matching passed String). This is especially useful in interceptor where the layer id is not available.

Related issues or pull requests

Pull request type

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Dependency updates
  • Tests
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe)

Do you introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Checklist

  • I understand and agree that the changes in this PR will be licensed under the
    Apache Licence Version 2.0.
  • I have followed the guidelines for contributing.
  • The proposed change fits to the content of the code of conduct.
  • I have added or updated tests and documentation, and the test suite passes (run mvn test locally).
  • I have added a screenshot/screencast to illustrate the visual output of my update.

@ahennr ahennr changed the title feat(repository): introduce search by layerName parameter feat(repository): introduce search for layers by layerName parameter Oct 9, 2024
@ahennr ahennr merged commit 9a0b7e7 into main Oct 9, 2024
4 checks passed
@ahennr ahennr deleted the layerbyname branch October 9, 2024 14:38
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 21.1.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants