Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: reset config if the input is invalid #8632

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

rleungx
Copy link
Member

@rleungx rleungx commented Sep 14, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Close #8619.

What is changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Release note

None.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the dco. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 14, 2024
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@lhy1024 lhy1024 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the rest LGTM

@@ -813,6 +813,60 @@ func (suite *schedulerTestSuite) checkSchedulerDiagnostic(cluster *pdTests.TestC
checkSchedulerDescribeCommand("balance-leader-scheduler", "normal", "")
}

func (suite *schedulerTestSuite) TestEvictLeaderScheduler() {
// FIXME: API mode may have the problem
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will we fix it in another PR?

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. approved labels Sep 14, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.65%. Comparing base (bd0d4ff) to head (114aa19).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8632      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.63%   77.65%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         474      474              
  Lines       62097    62105       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits        48209    48228      +19     
+ Misses      10340    10337       -3     
+ Partials     3548     3540       -8     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 77.65% <0.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

re.Contains(string(output), "Success!")
output, err = tests.ExecuteCommand(cmd, []string{"-u", pdAddr, "scheduler", "remove", "evict-leader-scheduler"}...)
re.NoError(err)
re.Contains(string(output), "Success!")
Copy link
Contributor

@lhy1024 lhy1024 Sep 14, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we need to check

        testutil.Eventually(re, func() bool { // wait for removed scheduler to be synced to scheduling server.
		output := mustExec(re, cmd, []string{"-u", pdAddr, "scheduler", "config", "evict-leader-scheduler"}, nil)
		return strings.Contains(output, "[404] scheduler not found")
	})

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seem not work

@@ -408,6 +415,7 @@ func (handler *evictLeaderHandler) updateConfig(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.R
batchFloat, ok := input["batch"].(float64)
if ok {
if batchFloat < 1 || batchFloat > 10 {
handler.config.removeStore(id)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For invalid config parameters, It's better to validate it, do nothing, and return 4xx + error message to let the users know it, it's not classic and unsafe to reset memory content when meeting invalid inputs.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a rollback operation since the memory state has been changed in line 407.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, make sense

@@ -408,6 +415,7 @@ func (handler *evictLeaderHandler) updateConfig(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.R
batchFloat, ok := input["batch"].(float64)
if ok {
if batchFloat < 1 || batchFloat > 10 {
handler.config.removeStore(id)
Copy link
Member

@okJiang okJiang Sep 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Do we allow the input to not contain the store id? If this, we can check if !inputHasStoreID in L405, and assume that all subsequent cases are inputHasStoreID by default.
  2. How about puting L407(pauseLeaderTransferIfStoreNotExist) behind all checks over? In this case, we don't need to removeStore for each case.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Yes, we allow only changing batch size.
  2. range relies on exist, only batch can be moved, but no much difference I think.

Copy link
Member

@okJiang okJiang Sep 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about adding a defer after L411? For now, it is so easy to forget to removeStore, like L445.

defer func () {
    if err != nil {
         ....
    }
}()

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lhy1024, okJiang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Sep 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 24, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-09-14 07:22:31.377565329 +0000 UTC m=+686621.117989267: ☑️ agreed by lhy1024.
  • 2024-09-24 05:20:57.557249814 +0000 UTC m=+1543327.297673751: ☑️ agreed by okJiang.

@rleungx
Copy link
Member Author

rleungx commented Sep 24, 2024

/retest

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 6b927e1 into tikv:master Sep 24, 2024
23 of 25 checks passed
@rleungx rleungx deleted the fix-build-error branch September 24, 2024 06:07
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-5.4 Should cherry pick this PR to release-5.4 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. labels Sep 24, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. labels Sep 24, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #8657.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-5.4: #8658.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/pd that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #8659.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/pd that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/pd that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/pd that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #8660.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/pd that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #8661.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.1: #8662.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/pd that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
close #8619

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2024
close #8619

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
close #8619

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
rleungx added a commit to ti-chi-bot/pd that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
close #8619

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Ryan Leung <[email protected]>
rleungx added a commit to ti-chi-bot/pd that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the dco. lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-5.4 Should cherry pick this PR to release-5.4 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-6.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scheduler: there is error not handled in evict-leader-scheduler
5 participants