Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 4, 2024. It is now read-only.

deps: update dependency gatsby-plugin-offline to v6 #573

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 29, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
gatsby-plugin-offline (source) ^5.24.0 -> ^6.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

gatsbyjs/gatsby

v6.0.0

Compare Source

🧾 Release notes

Chores

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/gatsby-plugin-offline-6.x branch from 72893ea to a825648 Compare November 29, 2022 23:14
@noahnu noahnu closed this Nov 29, 2022
@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Nov 29, 2022

Renovate Ignore Notification

Because you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update. You will not get PRs for any future 6.x releases. But if you manually upgrade to 6.x then Renovate will re-enable minor and patch updates automatically.

If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR.

@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/gatsby-plugin-offline-6.x branch November 29, 2022 23:29
@tophat-opensource-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Monodeploy Publish Preview

This Pull Request introduces the following changes:

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants