Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AP-1794] bug fix for partial sync multiprocessing #1186

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

amofakhar
Copy link
Contributor

@amofakhar amofakhar commented Oct 31, 2024

Context

https://transferwise.atlassian.net/browse/AP-1794

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to PipelineWise?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • Description above provides context of the change
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Unit tests for changes (not needed for documentation changes)
  • CI checks pass with my changes
  • Branch name starts with AP-NNN (if applicable. AP-NNN = JIRA ID)
  • Relevant documentation is updated including usage instructions

Details from ticket: AP-1794

Partial-Sync launches the same sync jobs multiple times as sub-processes

h2. Problem

Partial-Sync launches the same sync jobs multiple times as sub-processes

[https://wise.slack.com/archives/GTAG72L9J/p1721240775328399|https://wise.slack.com/archives/GTAG72L9J/p1721240775328399|smart-link]

@amofakhar amofakhar merged commit 81f607f into master Nov 1, 2024
14 checks passed
@amofakhar amofakhar deleted the bugfix/AP-1794_partial_sync branch November 1, 2024 09:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants