Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Test lakeFSFS with lakeFS server version 1.48.1 #8488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

Test lakeFSFS with lakeFS server version 1.48.1 #8488

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

arielshaqed
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@arielshaqed arielshaqed requested a review from N-o-Z January 9, 2025 18:30
@arielshaqed arielshaqed added pr/merge-if-approved Reviewer: please feel free to merge if no major comments area/testing Improvements or additions to tests exclude-changelog PR description should not be included in next release changelog minor-change Used for PRs that don't require issue attached area/client/hadoopfs labels Jan 9, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

E2E Test Results - DynamoDB Local - Local Block Adapter

13 passed

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

E2E Test Results - Quickstart

11 passed

@N-o-Z N-o-Z merged commit f928a1d into master Jan 9, 2025
46 of 48 checks passed
@N-o-Z N-o-Z deleted the chore/lakefsfs-compatibility-with-1.48.1 branch January 9, 2025 19:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@N-o-Z N-o-Z N-o-Z approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/client/hadoopfs area/testing Improvements or additions to tests exclude-changelog PR description should not be included in next release changelog minor-change Used for PRs that don't require issue attached pr/merge-if-approved Reviewer: please feel free to merge if no major comments
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@arielshaqed @N-o-Z