Update test vals of failing tests for upstream packages

[DanielDoehring]

See test failures in recent CI runs

https://github.com/trixi-framework/Trixi.jl/actions/runs/7017090127/job/19089672351?pr=1756#step:7:3702
https://github.com/trixi-framework/Trixi.jl/actions/runs/7017086643/job/19089662564?pr=1755#step:7:3702

[github-actions]

Review checklist

This checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging.

Purpose and scope

• The PR has a single goal that is clear from the PR title and/or description.
• All code changes represent a single set of modifications that logically belong together.
• No more than 500 lines of code are changed or there is no obvious way to split the PR into multiple PRs.

Code quality

• The code can be understood easily.
• Newly introduced names for variables etc. are self-descriptive and consistent with existing naming conventions.
• There are no redundancies that can be removed by simple modularization/refactoring.
• There are no leftover debug statements or commented code sections.
• The code adheres to our conventions and style guide, and to the Julia guidelines.

Documentation

• New functions and types are documented with a docstring or top-level comment.
• Relevant publications are referenced in docstrings (see example for formatting).
• Inline comments are used to document longer or unusual code sections.
• Comments describe intent ("why?") and not just functionality ("what?").
• If the PR introduces a significant change or new feature, it is documented in NEWS.md.

Testing

• The PR passes all tests.
• New or modified lines of code are covered by tests.
• New or modified tests run in less then 10 seconds.

Performance

• There are no type instabilities or memory allocations in performance-critical parts.
• If the PR intent is to improve performance, before/after time measurements are posted in the PR.

Verification

• The correctness of the code was verified using appropriate tests.
• If new equations/methods are added, a convergence test has been run and the results
  are posted in the PR.

Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (17d5070) 67.81% compared to head (d92de11) 92.75%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/visualization/recipes_plots.jl	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1760       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   67.81%   92.75%   +24.94%     
===========================================
  Files         431      431               
  Lines       34785    34889      +104     
===========================================
+ Hits        23587    32358     +8771     
+ Misses      11198     2531     -8667     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	92.75% <97.22%> (+24.94%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ranocha]

It's still weird but the new tests seem to be fine 🤷

[ranocha]

Thanks

[DanielDoehring]

Got finally all format errors