Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Update OpenAPI Specification for Ideogram API with New Properties and Schemas #47

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Dec 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Users can now specify the number of images to generate or edit in a single request, with options ranging from 1 to 8.
    • Two new model types, V_2_1 and V_2_1_TURBO, have been added for enhanced image generation and editing capabilities.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the OpenAPI specification for the Ideogram API by adding new properties and updating existing schemas. Key changes include the introduction of the num_images property across multiple request schemas, which allows users to specify the number of images to generate or edit. Additionally, the ModelEnum schema has been expanded to include new model types, enhancing the API's capabilities for image processing.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/libs/Ideogram/openapi.yaml - Added num_images property to EditImageRequest, ImageRequest, RemixImageRequest, and UpscaleInitialImageRequest schemas.
- Updated ModelEnum to include V_2_1 and V_2_1_TURBO.
- Clarified endpoint support for model types in the description.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • github-actions

Poem

🐇 In the garden where ideas bloom,
New images dance, dispelling gloom.
With num_images now in play,
More creations come out to play.
V_2_1 joins the fun,
Together, we shine like the sun! 🌞


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge December 9, 2024 03:38
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Update OpenAPI Specification for Ideogram API with New Properties and Schemas Dec 9, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa4f89c and 28e1234.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (6)
  • src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.GenerateClient.PostEditImage.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IGenerateClient.PostEditImage.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.Models.EditImageRequest.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.Models.ImageRequest.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.Models.ModelEnum.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.Models.UpscaleInitialImageRequest.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/Ideogram/openapi.yaml (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/Ideogram/openapi.yaml (1)

509-510: LGTM: Consistent implementation of num_images property.

The addition of the num_images property to EditImageRequest is implemented correctly using schema reference.

Comment on lines +710 to +715
num_images:
title: num_images
maximum: 8
minimum: 1
type: integer
default: 1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using schema reference for num_images property.

The num_images property is defined inline with the same constraints as the NumImages schema. To improve maintainability and ensure consistency, consider using a schema reference instead.

Apply this change:

        num_images:
-          title: num_images
-          maximum: 8
-          minimum: 1
-          type: integer
-          default: 1
+          $ref: '#/components/schemas/NumImages'
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
num_images:
title: num_images
maximum: 8
minimum: 1
type: integer
default: 1
num_images:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/NumImages'

Comment on lines +651 to +656
num_images:
title: num_images
maximum: 8
minimum: 1
type: integer
default: 1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using schema reference for num_images property.

The num_images property is defined inline with the same constraints as the NumImages schema. To improve maintainability and ensure consistency, consider using a schema reference instead.

Apply this change:

        num_images:
-          title: num_images
-          maximum: 8
-          minimum: 1
-          type: integer
-          default: 1
+          $ref: '#/components/schemas/NumImages'
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
num_images:
title: num_images
maximum: 8
minimum: 1
type: integer
default: 1
num_images:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/NumImages'

Comment on lines +809 to +812
- V_2_1
- V_2_1_TURBO
type: string
description: 'The model used to generate an image or edit one. /generate supports all model types, however, /edit is only supported for V_2 and V_2_TURBO.'
description: 'The model used to generate an image or edit one. /generate and /remix supports all model types, however, /edit is only supported for V_2 and V_2_TURBO.'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistency found in model compatibility documentation

The ModelEnum description states that "/edit is only supported for V_2 and V_2_TURBO", but this appears to be outdated since the ModelEnum now includes V_2_1 and V_2_1_TURBO. The endpoint documentation doesn't explicitly specify model restrictions for any endpoint, making it unclear whether the compatibility statement is accurate.

  • Update needed in ModelEnum description at line 812 to either:
    • Include V_2_1 and V_2_1_TURBO as supported models for /edit endpoint, or
    • Explicitly confirm that /edit endpoint is indeed restricted to only V_2 and V_2_TURBO
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Model enum updates with clear compatibility documentation.

The addition of V_2_1 and V_2_1_TURBO models and the updated description clearly documenting endpoint compatibility is well implemented.

Let's verify the model compatibility documentation in the API endpoints:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify model compatibility documentation in endpoints

# Check if the model compatibility is consistently documented across endpoints
rg -A 5 "model:" openapi.yaml

Length of output: 82


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the correct path to the openapi.yaml file
fd openapi.yaml

# Then, let's check the model compatibility documentation across endpoints
rg -A 5 "model:" $(fd openapi.yaml)

Length of output: 2619


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the endpoint definitions to verify the model compatibility claims
rg -B 5 -A 10 "/generate|/remix|/edit" src/libs/Ideogram/openapi.yaml

Length of output: 3008

Comment on lines +1140 to +1145
NumImages:
title: num_images
maximum: 8
minimum: 1
type: integer
default: 1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent usage of NumImages schema found

The verification reveals inconsistency in the OpenAPI specification:

  • One occurrence properly references the NumImages schema using $ref: '#/components/schemas/NumImages'
  • Two other occurrences duplicate the schema definition inline instead of using the reference

This should be unified to consistently use the reusable NumImages schema component to maintain better maintainability and prevent potential inconsistencies.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-defined NumImages schema.

The NumImages schema is well-defined with appropriate constraints. However, ensure it's consistently used across all request schemas that include the num_images property.

Let's verify the consistent usage of the NumImages schema:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of NumImages schema

# Check for all occurrences of num_images in the spec
rg -A 3 "num_images:" openapi.yaml

# Check for all references to NumImages schema
rg -A 1 '\$ref: ''#/components/schemas/NumImages''' openapi.yaml

Length of output: 203


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the correct path to the OpenAPI spec file
fd -g "*openapi*.yaml" -g "*openapi*.yml"

# Once we find it, we'll verify the usage patterns

Length of output: 144


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the OpenAPI spec file
fd openapi

# Also try searching in common API documentation locations
fd -t f . src/libs/Ideogram/

Length of output: 10641


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Now that we found the correct path, let's check for NumImages usage
rg -A 3 "num_images:" src/libs/Ideogram/openapi.yaml

# Check for references to NumImages schema
rg -A 1 '\$ref: ''#/components/schemas/NumImages''' src/libs/Ideogram/openapi.yaml

Length of output: 446


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's get more context around these num_images occurrences
rg -B 2 -A 5 "num_images:" src/libs/Ideogram/openapi.yaml

Length of output: 898

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 70b5afc into main Dec 9, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant