-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multi query calc process doc #139
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -37,6 +38,22 @@ what can be done. | |||
On resource discovery or an event, Guardrails will evaluate a calculated policy in | |||
the same way as a normal policy. | |||
|
|||
## How has the multi-query calc process been optimized in Guardrails? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is kind of generic and meaningless... it doesn't add any value.
Can you update to be something like:
How do I reference metadata about the current resource in the calculated policy input (the graphql query)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should show an example and list the data elements available.
@@ -207,6 +207,98 @@ The combination of GraphQL and Nunjucks make calculated policies powerful and | |||
flexible. Any Turbot Guardrails policy can be calculated, using any data in the entire | |||
CMDB! | |||
|
|||
## Improved Multi‐Query Calc Process |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This section is much better. Maybe use this for the FAQ and then just include a simple example in the 7 min lab without explaining it.
No description provided.