Remove references to Disney.

[zainab-ali]

This PR renames references from com.disneystreaming to org.typelevel.

In addition:

• The CLA assistant link and reference has been removed.
• Gitter has been replaced with a link to weaver-dev on Discord. We'd want to link to a weaver channel once created.

The codebase still references issues and discussions on the disneystreaming/weaver-test repo. These are the only references to disney that remain.

[zainab-ali]

Assuming the repo is archived and not deleted, we can still reference this.

That said, I wonder if this portion of the docs could be removed entirely

[Baccata]

👍

[mpilquist]

I'd move this up to top of the file or otherwise I feel it'll never be updated. Maybe this:

Copyright 2024 Typelevel and respective contributors
Copyright 2020-2024 Disney Streaming Services

Then when we update to 2025, both get updated.

[Baccata]

Why should both get updated, if the fork happens in 2024 and the Disney one never gets any contributions ever again ?

[djspiewak]

I agree with moving the copyright up to the top so they're in pairs. This also avoids having to repeat the license fragment. Additionally, I would leave the DSS copyright backdated, for exactly the reasons @Baccata stated. Given that it's a fork, Disney has no claim on contributions made beyond that date.

Regarding the Typelevel wording, I still have concerns about the "and respective contributors" bit (and all variants thereof). That's not the only reason the heading is problematic though, so these are all shades of legal gray. I understand "Typelevel" (without qualification) to refer to the broad collective of individuals who have touched the specific file, since Typelevel is no longer a legally incorporated entity nor has it established a work-for-hire arrangement with any of the constituent contributors. All of which is to say that the copyright is actually held by 1) Disney (for anything pre-fork either performed by Disney employees or covered under CLA), and 2) the individual personages who wrote the code, which makes the whole header kind of wrong unless we interpret "Typelevel" to be a way of referring to the amorphous collective loosely identified by git blame rather than a singular indemnifying entity. Which is to say that the "and respective contributors" bit is redundant and must be redundant for the header to have any meaning at all.

[zainab-ali]

Thanks for the feedback. I've moved the copyright up to the top, replaced Typelevel with just respective contributors, and deleted the additional Apache License block.

Note that by deleting the additional License block, we're keeping to Disney Streaming's trademark edits of Section 6. Is that really something we want? I separated the two initially (and moved Disney streaming down the page) so that we could have the standard license.

[Baccata]

Yeah once again, this is something that we could use @djspiewak's opinion on.

Daniel, the license of disneystreaming/weaver is essentially a copy of Apache 2, with an additional amendment giving some strict wording with regards to branding. This amended Apache 2 was more recently named TOST ( https://disneystreaming.github.io/TOST-1.0.txt).

I think generally speaking, you cannot distribute software under a less strict license than the one it was originally distributed under. That being said, the paragraph feels way overzealous.

[Baccata]

I think Daniel meant, "keep Copyright 2024 Typelevel and drop the respective contributors part", but I don't think his firmware allows him to formulate that in a way that's not confusing to the rest of us, and my interpretation of his output stream may be wrong.

So I'm referring myself to the source headers of other typelevel projects