Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relocate CPF Read + Power Strap Issues #841

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024
Merged

Relocate CPF Read + Power Strap Issues #841

merged 11 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

kenhoberkeley
Copy link
Contributor

@kenhoberkeley kenhoberkeley commented Feb 12, 2024

Related PRs / Issues

  • CPF intent can only be read when after ILM flattening. It is not possible to flatten ILMs before floorplanning. Hence, move the CPF read to later in the flow.
  • Power straps continue to interact with routing within the halos. Proposed solution is like so: 1) Routing halo generation remains the same. Placement halo is slightly increased in size. A power routing blockage is then created in same shape as the placement halo. This allows router to avoid power straps in a non-routing-halo region, before subsequently entering the halo region (this seems to work better). Also, enforce situations where pins for power and signal generated together on a layer.

Type of change:

  • [X ] Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Other enhancement

Impact:

  • Change to core Hammer
  • [X ] Change to a Hammer plugin
  • Other

Contributor Checklist:

  • [X ] Did you set master as the base branch?
  • [X ] Did you state the type-of-change/impact?
  • [ X] Did you delete any extraneous prints/debugging code?
  • [ X] (If applicable) Did you add documentation for the feature?
  • [ X] (If applicable) Did you update the poetry.lock file if you updated the requirements in pyproject.toml?
  • [ X] (If applicable) Did you add a unit test demonstrating the PR?
  • [ X] (If applicable) Did you run this through the e2e integration tests?
  • [ X] (If applicable) Did you update the submodules in e2e/ if this feature depends on updated plugins?

hammer/tech/stackup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
hammer/par/innovus/__init__.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@harrisonliew harrisonliew added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 048be5d Feb 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@harrisonliew harrisonliew deleted the minor_fix branch February 12, 2024 18:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants