-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update fetchSubregions to return empty array on no results #195
Update fetchSubregions to return empty array on no results #195
Conversation
Modified fetchSubregions function to return an empty array instead of null when no subregions are available, aligning with the expected return type and ensuring consistency in handling empty results across the application. Issue: #189 Signed-off-by: Nikolay Martyanov <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes involve a refactoring of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Files selected for processing (2)
- frontend/src/api/index.js (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/components/RegionMap.jsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
frontend/src/api/index.js (2)
34-40: The change to return an empty array instead of
null
when a 204 status code is received is consistent with the PR objectives and improves the predictability of the function's return type.34-40: Ensure that the error handling and return patterns in
fetchSubregions
are consistent with other data fetching functions in the file, such asfetchRootRegions
,fetchSiblings
,fetchRegion
,fetchRegionGeometry
,fetchAncestors
, andfetchSearchResults
.Verification successful
The review of the
frontend/src/api/index.js
file's error handling and return patterns for various fetching functions shows the following:
fetchRootRegions
,fetchRegion
,fetchAncestors
,fetchHierarchies
, andfetchSearchResults
functions all return an empty array[]
in their catch blocks and do not check for specific response statuses.fetchSiblings
andfetchSubregions
functions check for specific response statuses (404 and 204 respectively) and return an empty array[]
if those statuses are encountered.- The
fetchRegionGeometry
function has a different pattern where it returnsnull
for 204 and 404 statuses and throws a new error in the catch block instead of returning an empty array.Based on this information, the error handling and return patterns in
fetchSubregions
are consistent with most other data fetching functions in the file, with the exception offetchRegionGeometry
, which has a different approach for handling 204 and 404 statuses and error cases.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistency of error handling and return patterns across all fetch functions rg --type js 'catch \(error\) {'Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistency of error handling and return patterns across all fetch functions rg --type js 'catch \(error\) \{'Length of output: 464
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the code inside catch blocks and the code that precedes them to verify the consistency of return patterns rg --type js -C 5 'catch \(error\) \{' frontend/src/api/index.jsLength of output: 2422
frontend/src/components/RegionMap.jsx (2)
64-69: The removal of the conditional check for
null
inMapComponent
aligns with the changes made in thefetchSubregions
function and simplifies the logic by directly returning thesubregions
.64-69: Confirm that the changes made to the handling of subregions do not impact the map initialization and update logic, particularly the
initializeMap
andupdateSelectedRegionStyle
functions.Verification successful
The shell script output indicates that the
initializeMap
andupdateSelectedRegionStyle
functions are indeed present in theRegionMap.jsx
file. The output shows thatupdateSelectedRegionStyle
is called with theselectedRegion.id
as an argument, andinitializeMap
is called without arguments.Given that the changes to the
MapComponent
function involve the handling of subregions and do not modify theinitializeMap
orupdateSelectedRegionStyle
functions directly, it is reasonable to infer that the changes should not impact the map initialization and update logic, as long as the contract of thefetchSubregions
function remains the same (i.e., it returns an array, which is now always the case).However, without seeing the full implementation of
initializeMap
andupdateSelectedRegionStyle
, we cannot be completely certain that there are no indirect dependencies on the behavior offetchSubregions
. For example, if either function had logic that specifically handled anull
return value fromfetchSubregions
, then the change to always return an array could impact that logic.To be thorough, we should check the implementation of these two functions to confirm that they do not have any such dependencies.
The provided script output shows the context around the
updateSelectedRegionStyle
andinitializeMap
functions within theRegionMap.jsx
file. From the output, we can observe the following:
- The
updateSelectedRegionStyle
function takesnewSelectedRegionId
as a parameter and updates the style of the selected region. It does not appear to have any dependency on the behavior offetchSubregions
.- The
initializeMap
function is responsible for loading the map container, fetching visible regions, and setting up their geometries. It does not directly callfetchSubregions
or handle its return value.Based on this information, it seems that the changes made to the
fetchSubregions
function, which now returns an empty array instead ofnull
, should not impact the logic withininitializeMap
orupdateSelectedRegionStyle
. These functions do not appear to have any code that specifically depends on thefetchSubregions
return value beingnull
.Therefore, the review comment asking to confirm that the changes made to the handling of subregions do not impact the map initialization and update logic can be addressed as follows:
- The
updateSelectedRegionStyle
function's logic is not related to thefetchSubregions
function and thus remains unaffected by the changes.- The
initializeMap
function does not interact with thefetchSubregions
function based on the provided context, so it should also remain unaffected by the changes.Given this analysis, the changes made to the handling of subregions in the
MapComponent
function are verified to not impact the map initialization and update logic as defined in theinitializeMap
andupdateSelectedRegionStyle
functions.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the changes to subregions handling do not affect map initialization and update logic rg --type js 'initializeMap|updateSelectedRegionStyle'Length of output: 384
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of initializeMap and updateSelectedRegionStyle for dependencies on fetchSubregions behavior rg --type js --context 10 'initializeMap|updateSelectedRegionStyle' frontend/src/components/RegionMap.jsxLength of output: 2166
Description
This PR updates the
fetchSubregions
function within the frontend'sapi
module to return an empty array instead ofnull
when there are no subregions available. This change ensures consistency across the application by conforming to the expected return type for collection results and prevents potential errors or inconsistencies in type handling downstream.Related Issues
Closes: #189
How Was This Tested?
Checklist
Before submitting your PR, please review the following:
Summary by CodeRabbit