Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial EDN ADC/SMC #299

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

glennawatson
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Add ground and tower SOPs for Edinburgh

Changes

Changes:

  • ADC/SMC sops for EDN

@glennawatson glennawatson force-pushed the glennawatson/edinburgh branch 5 times, most recently from 5c60493 to 07e022b Compare August 24, 2024 14:22
@glennawatson glennawatson force-pushed the glennawatson/edinburgh branch from 07e022b to 32d06a7 Compare August 24, 2024 14:24
@alphadelta332
Copy link
Contributor

Is this ready for review @glennawatson ?

If not, just change it to a draft PR, and/or add the DO NOT MERGE label.

If it is, I'll review shortly

@glennawatson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should be ready yep.

@glennawatson
Copy link
Contributor Author

If it's not a draft or have wip in the descriptions it is ready btw :)

Copy link
Contributor

@alphadelta332 alphadelta332 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Glenn, appreciate the work

Circuit operations occur within the CTR bounded by the Gawler River to the north and the powerline running from the Gawler River (1.5NM south of the Gawler Township) to the south eastern boundary of the ED CTR. Vertical Limits `SFC` to `A020`

If Parafield RWY 03L is active, it can infringe on the circuit deadside. VFR traffic in the ECA is instructed to remain on the west of the RWY centreline.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor note, just a bit of swapping between abbreviations. Either go with EDN CIRA of ECA for all

If Parafield RWY 03L is active, it can infringe on the circuit deadside. VFR traffic in the ECA is instructed to remain on the west of the RWY centreline.

**Example**:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this be in the form of a !!! example please

| 36 | Left |

## Departure Levels
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coordination would be a better heading for this section

Aircraft will be cleared to an initial level of A040 at clearance delivery unless a lower level is requested. Adelaide Approach will clear aircraft to their planned height following departure.

Aircraft departing YPED into EDN TCU Class C airspace will be coordinated from EDN ADC at taxi.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Taxi coord can be removed. Not required

Aircraft can expect to depart to the north, regardless of the duty runway, to conform with Adelaide traffic.

Aircraft will be cleared to an initial level of A040 at clearance delivery unless a lower level is requested. Adelaide Approach will clear aircraft to their planned height following departure.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this be tweaked to match the formatting of other Class D Tower Coordination sections please? Have the departures section, arrivals/overfliers section, and standard assignable levels written within them

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a Class D

<span class="hotline">**EDN ADC** -> **AD TCU**</span>: "MRNR21, Number 1. MRNR22, Number 2"

## Helicopter Operations
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we please move this above the coord section to be in line with other tower formatting?


### Arrivals
AD TCU must coordinate the sequence information to EDN ADC prior to transfer of jurisdiction.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wording tweak to match other class D tower coord sections

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Edinburgh is Class C though?

@glennawatson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alphadelta332 Some of the feedback doesn't make sense, asking matching Class D airports when it's a Class C airport?

@alphadelta332
Copy link
Contributor

@alphadelta332 Some of the feedback doesn't make sense, asking matching Class D airports when it's a Class C airport?

Referring specifically to the formatting of the Coordination section.

Class C airports don't have a Coordination section generally, whereas Class D airports do, similar to the Coordination formatting we're doing here

@alphadelta332 alphadelta332 linked an issue Sep 6, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@mattkelly4
Copy link
Collaborator

Just chasing this up, are you waiting for a review from us @glennawatson ? Or are you implementing changes requested?

@glennawatson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Don't have time for a little bit to get this done. Likely next weekend. Been snowed under by work.

@mattkelly4
Copy link
Collaborator

Don't have time for a little bit to get this done. Likely next weekend. Been snowed under by work.

No rush, I think we're the same, just wanted to make sure you weren't waiting for us

@glennawatson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Going to have a go finishing this up this weekend. changed jobs, got a lot more time back again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

YPED Procedures
3 participants