Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
YBBN Helicopter Operations #395
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
YBBN Helicopter Operations #395
Changes from 4 commits
5450a8d
29b19bf
5473ab3
9b28c29
ced34a1
06a859d
f40ac22
9e1b9c3
4aa9148
0d1a8bf
a83d9e9
0ae364d
f85ad88
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We'll need to decide which ADC is responsible for each part of the aerodrome, since ADC doesn't own any airspace by default. This might need to be coordinated with the TMA or we might need to give ADC some airspace to manage it themselves. @alphadelta332 thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We'll need to sort out the coordination required if ADC is going to clear the aircraft for a visual approach. Might be easier to give BN ADC ownership of the CTR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if it's worth mentioning, but IRL ADC (120.5) often clears aircraft landing on H2 for the visual approach, and pretty sure ADC-N (118.0) clear aircraft for the visual approach F4 HLS.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah cool, I guess that makes sense based on their likely inbound direction.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are the heli waypoints separated from fixed wing ops? If so, we might suggest that as a course of action exclusively, rather than present position.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The heli waypoints are separated from fixed wing ops, the actual suburb / waypoint of Bald Hills is 6nm north of 01L/19R. I only added the present position call in case the helis are pasted Bald Hills are over some of the closer suburbs. But from what i've heard IRL, Bald Hills doesn't necessarily act as a clearance limit, just an inbound reporting point. However I may be wrong and it could be important that we mention it similar to how Sydney's coded arrivals work with holding at the limit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah right, that's good then. There's also a likelihood that these aircraft will enter the CTR directly from class G. I suspect we'll end up going down the line of TMA clearing them to say A010V and issuing a clearance limit of the waypoint, then contacting TWR for visual approach clearance (who will instruct them to remain clear of any fixed wing traffic if necessary). If the aircraft is going Class G->CTR, they will likely be told to remain OCTA until that takes place. Hold tight for now and we'll see whether we want to redo the BN CTR jurisdiction
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Runway 01L
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed