deploy: ff82317

_sources/join_in/join_in.md.txt

@@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ Writeup: Coming soon!
 ### 9th October
 Material: [Time to reality check the promises of machine learning-powered precision medicine](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(20)30200-4/fulltext)
 
+Discussion questions:
+1) How should we more meaningfully assess applications of ML to medicine (and other fields)?
+2) Why do you think most of the reviewed ML methods are producing classifications (i.e. diagnosed or not diagnosed) instead of predicting a continuum of risk?
+3) Do you think precision medicine itself is an epistemological dead end? What about stratified medicine? (identifying and predicting subgroups with a better and worse response)
+
 ### 23rd October
 To be decided.
 

join_in/join_in.html

@@ -500,6 +500,12 @@ <h3>25th September<a class="headerlink" href="#th-september" title="Link to this
 <section id="th-october">
 <h3>9th October<a class="headerlink" href="#th-october" title="Link to this heading">#</a></h3>
 <p>Material: <a class="reference external" href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(20)30200-4/fulltext">Time to reality check the promises of machine learning-powered precision medicine</a></p>
+<p>Discussion questions:</p>
+<ol class="arabic simple">
+<li><p>How should we more meaningfully assess applications of ML to medicine (and other fields)?</p></li>
+<li><p>Why do you think most of the reviewed ML methods are producing classifications (i.e. diagnosed or not diagnosed) instead of predicting a continuum of risk?</p></li>
+<li><p>Do you think precision medicine itself is an epistemological dead end? What about stratified medicine? (identifying and predicting subgroups with a better and worse response)</p></li>
+</ol>
 </section>
 <section id="rd-october">
 <h3>23rd October<a class="headerlink" href="#rd-october" title="Link to this heading">#</a></h3>