Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reject atomic distributed transaction on savepoints and modified system settings #16835

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

harshit-gangal
Copy link
Member

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal commented Sep 24, 2024

Description

This PR rejects a Atomic Distributed Transaction Commit when the session have modified system settings or using temporary table or have savepoints inside the transaction.

This will be removed when the support is added for it.

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Sep 24, 2024
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal added Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) Component: Query Serving and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Sep 24, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v21.0.0 milestone Sep 24, 2024
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2024 10:24
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.45%. Comparing base (83b37b8) to head (d3a9131).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16835      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.54%   69.45%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files        1569     1571       +2     
  Lines      202555   203012     +457     
==========================================
+ Hits       140865   141001     +136     
- Misses      61690    62011     +321     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal merged commit 3e53713 into vitessio:main Sep 27, 2024
98 checks passed
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal deleted the reject-2pc branch September 27, 2024 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Query Serving Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants