Fix jq version for github actions

[Kidswiss]

Checklist

• The PR has a meaningful title. It will be used to auto generate the
  changelog.
  The PR has a meaningful description that sums up the change. It will be
  linked in the changelog.
• PR contains a single logical change (to build a better changelog).
• Categorize the PR by adding one of the labels:
  bug, enhancement, documentation, change, breaking, dependency
  as they show up in the changelog.
• Link this PR to related issues or PRs.

[zugao]

I would keep the project name instead of team name.

[wejdross]

I wouldn't - it's descriptive for all engineers right now, it's also easy way to contact with us.
Component can be owned by different teams, schedar is just one

[Kidswiss]

It's currently deployed as schedar-e2e, this adjustment makes that the jsonnet actually matches what's deployed.

But if you like the old name more, I can change it.

[Kidswiss]

I wouldn't - it's descriptive for all engineers right now, it's also easy way to contact with us. Component can be owned by different teams, schedar is just one

True, but schedar owns appcat, so it should be the same either way.

But thinking a bit more about the naming, it might make sense to go with appcat-e2e. Otherwise, we're leaking some vshn internal naming to the product.

[wejdross]

looks good, I saw it worked for LAB cluster, I don't care that much about namespace name, LGTM