Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specify in which contexts optional members are applicable #193

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2022

Conversation

drkron
Copy link
Contributor

@drkron drkron commented Apr 8, 2022

Fixes #187


Preview | Diff

Copy link
Contributor

@chcunningham chcunningham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Mostly nits

index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
@chcunningham
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @drkron !

@chcunningham chcunningham merged commit 55cf43a into w3c:main Apr 19, 2022
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2022
SHA: 55cf43a
Reason: push, by @chcunningham

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

clarify which dictionary members are valid in context of encoding/decoding and type
2 participants