Restore qualifying language about vc and vp claims

[selfissued]

Restores qualifying language inadvertently deleted by #304.

Fixes #305

---

Preview | Diff

[TallTed]

Sadly, I'm now even more worried about what else may have been lost by similar activities as wiped this line out.

[TallTed]

Note that this fixes line ~318.

There are two other similarly phrased paragraphs, at line ~607 and ~1179, which I found by viewing this file on the main branch, and searching for MUST NOT be present. (Something else has just changed, as ~1179 is no longer present, but ~607 still remains.)

[selfissued]

The occurrence of

The JWT Claim Names vc and vp MUST NOT be present.

that you're referring to @TallTed is in the 3.1.3 JOSE Header Parameters and JWT Claims section, which is within the With JOSE section, so taken in context, it's clear that the statement only applies to VCs secured with JOSE, and so is fine as-is.

PR #304 didn't change that text.

[TallTed]

in the 3.1.3 JOSE Header Parameters and JWT Claims section, which is within the With JOSE section

OK, I think I can live with that.

[decentralgabe]

Purely editorial. Approved and merging.