Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python 3.12 compatibility fixes #1712

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023
Merged

Conversation

bstaletic
Copy link
Collaborator

@bstaletic bstaletic commented Oct 2, 2023

  • Update of jedi
  • f-string flake8 fixes
  • Our extra conf no longer uses distutils.

CI is still not ready for python 3.12. Stay tuned.


This change is Reviewable

distutils has been deprecated for a long time and has finally been
removed.
This update of jedi is compatible with python 3.12
Copy link
Member

@puremourning puremourning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @bstaletic)


third_party/jedi_deps/jedi line 1 at r1 (raw file):

Subproject commit 4e175ca82bbd680cb90f462545c10a8b1c0b5f2e

we didn't need to update typeshed or whatever that dependency is too?
we usually do when updating Jedi.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bstaletic bstaletic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @puremourning)


third_party/jedi_deps/jedi line 1 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, puremourning (Ben Jackson) wrote…

we didn't need to update typeshed or whatever that dependency is too?
we usually do when updating Jedi.

I have checked. third_party/jedi_deps/parso had no newer release.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bstaletic bstaletic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 0 of 2 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @puremourning)


third_party/jedi_deps/jedi line 1 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, bstaletic (Boris Staletic) wrote…

I have checked. third_party/jedi_deps/parso had no newer release.

Oh and typeshed itself is vendored by jedi, not a submodule.

Copy link
Member

@puremourning puremourning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 0 of 2 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @bstaletic)

Copy link
Member

@puremourning puremourning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: 1 of 2 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @bstaletic)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1712 (53a7c2c) into master (ed6a49a) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1712      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.44%   95.40%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          83       83              
  Lines        8123     8122       -1     
  Branches      164      165       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         7753     7749       -4     
- Misses        320      322       +2     
- Partials       50       51       +1     

@bstaletic bstaletic added the Ship It! Manual override to merge a PR by maintainer label Oct 2, 2023
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 2, 2023

Thanks for sending a PR!

@mergify mergify bot merged commit e755af6 into ycm-core:master Oct 2, 2023
15 of 17 checks passed
@bstaletic bstaletic deleted the py312-bugs branch October 2, 2023 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ship It! Manual override to merge a PR by maintainer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants