Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EndsDaemon.java:63-64: Refactor this class to use... #934

Closed
alex-palevsky opened this issue Sep 18, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

EndsDaemon.java:63-64: Refactor this class to use... #934

alex-palevsky opened this issue Sep 18, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@alex-palevsky
Copy link
Contributor

Puzzle 567-359f8c66 in src/main/java/com/rultor/agents/daemons/EndsDaemon.java:63-64 has to be resolved: Refactor this class to use less objects and remove checkstyle exception above.... The puzzle was created by Yegor Bugayenko on 18-Sep-2015.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead

@alex-palevsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yegor256 I set the milestone to 2.0 since there is nothing set yet

@alex-palevsky alex-palevsky added this to the 2.0 milestone Sep 18, 2015
original-brownbear added a commit to original-brownbear/rultor that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2016
* Created new ShellCommand class to encapsulated running a command in a shell
* Used ShellCommand to make EndsDaemon use fewer objects and remove duplicate
logic for sanitizing and running commands in EndsDaemon
@original-brownbear
Copy link
Contributor

Suggested refactoring here #1004 :)

original-brownbear added a commit to original-brownbear/rultor that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2016
rultor pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2016
* Created new ShellCommand class to encapsulated running a command in a shell
* Used ShellCommand to make EndsDaemon use fewer objects and remove duplicate
logic for sanitizing and running commands in EndsDaemon
@alex-palevsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

@original-brownbear The issue should be closed..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants