Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use deno serve for compatibility #82

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

Use deno serve for compatibility #82

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

5ouma
Copy link
Owner

@5ouma 5ouma commented Oct 11, 2024

⚠️ Issue

close #


🔄 Type of the Change

  • 🎉 New Feature
  • 🧰 Bug
  • 🛡️ Security
  • 📖 Documentation
  • 🏎️ Performance
  • 🧹 Refactoring
  • 🧪 Testing
  • 🔧 Maintenance
  • 🎽 CI
  • ⛓️ Dependencies
  • 🧠 Meta

✏️ Description

It doesn't need local network access, and the code becomes clean.


It doesn't need local network access, and the code becomes clean.
@prlabeler prlabeler bot added the 🎉 New Feature Introduce a new feature label Oct 11, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant updates to the project's documentation and configuration files. The README.md file has been restructured to emphasize usage instructions over setup, with specific command changes for running the Deno application. The deno.json file has seen modifications in task definitions, replacing the run task with a serve task and adjusting network permissions. Additionally, the routing logic in src/server.ts has been enhanced with a new catch-all route, improving the application's handling of unmatched requests.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md - Section header changed from "Setup" to "Usage".
- Command updated from deno run -A ... to deno serve -A ....
- Import statement updated from import "jsr:@5ouma/reproxy"; to export { default } from "jsr:@5ouma/reproxy";.
- Minor content adjustments and reorganization for clarity.
deno.json - Task run removed; task serve added with command deno serve --env='.env' --allow-env --allow-net='api.github.com'.
- Updated start and dev tasks to use serve instead of run.
- Modified test task to restrict network permissions.
src/server.ts - Maintained existing GET route handling for /:ref?.
- Added catch-all GET route (*) for unmatched requests.
- Removed conditional check for Deno.serve(app.fetch).

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (98d4eaf) to head (1e3140f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #82   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines          110       109    -1     
  Branches         6         6           
=========================================
- Hits           110       109    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)

54-54: LGTM! Consider adding a brief explanation of the deno serve command.

The change from deno run to deno serve aligns well with the PR objective of using deno serve for compatibility. This update likely improves how the application is served, making it more suitable for web applications.

Consider adding a brief explanation of why deno serve is used and its benefits over deno run. This could help users understand the rationale behind the change and the advantages it brings.


81-81: LGTM! Consider adding an explanation of the export statement.

The change from an import statement to an export statement is appropriate for the Deno Deploy environment. This modification likely allows for better integration, enabling the default export from the reproxy module to be used directly.

To enhance clarity for users, consider adding a brief comment explaining why this export statement is used specifically for Deno Deploy and how it differs from the local usage. This could help users understand the deployment-specific configuration.


Line range hint 39-81: Overall, the README updates effectively communicate the changes in usage.

The modifications to the README.md file accurately reflect the PR objectives and provide clear instructions for using the reproxy module in both local and Deno Deploy environments. The consistency in using JSR (jsr:) across different sections maintains a unified approach to package management.

To further enhance the documentation:

  1. Consider adding a brief section explaining the benefits of using deno serve over deno run.
  2. Provide a short explanation of why the export statement is used specifically for Deno Deploy.
  3. If applicable, include a note about any potential breaking changes or migration steps for users updating from a previous version.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98d4eaf and 1e3140f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
  • deno.json (1 hunks)
  • src/server.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/server.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
deno.json (5)

11-11: Excellent use of deno serve for improved compatibility and security.

The new serve task aligns well with the PR objectives. By using deno serve instead of deno run, you've improved compatibility without requiring local network access. Additionally, removing 0.0.0.0 from the network permissions enhances security by restricting network access to only api.github.com.


12-12: LGTM: start task updated consistently.

The start task has been correctly updated to use the new serve task, maintaining consistency with the changes made. This ensures that the main application starts using the new serving method.


13-13: LGTM: dev task updated while preserving watch functionality.

The dev task has been correctly updated to use the new serve task while maintaining the --watch flag. This ensures that the development workflow remains intact with the new serving method.


11-14: Summary: Excellent improvements to compatibility and security.

The changes in this file successfully implement the use of deno serve as intended, improving compatibility without requiring local network access. The consistent updates across all tasks and the removal of broad network permissions (0.0.0.0) enhance the overall security of the project. These modifications align well with the PR objectives and represent a significant improvement to the project's configuration.

Great work on cleaning up the code and improving the project's structure!


14-14: Verify test coverage with restricted network permissions.

The test task has been updated to remove 0.0.0.0 from network permissions, which is consistent with the security improvements in other tasks. This change enhances security by limiting network access during tests to only api.github.com.

Please ensure that all tests still pass with this restricted network access. Run the following script to verify:

@5ouma 5ouma merged commit 1bbd450 into main Oct 11, 2024
13 checks passed
@5ouma 5ouma deleted the refactor-serve branch October 11, 2024 06:54
This was referenced Oct 11, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 22, 2024
12 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2024
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🎉 New Feature Introduce a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant