Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Synced Newspack Blocks: Update to 4.5.2 #40636

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tbradsha
Copy link
Contributor

@tbradsha tbradsha commented Dec 16, 2024

This updates the synced Newspack Blocks from 4.0.1 to 4.5.2:
https://github.com/Automattic/newspack-blocks/releases/tag/v4.5.2

It also does the following:

  • Allows one to resync the existing version of blocks.
  • Adjusts the script to automate a few more tasks listed in README.md (e.g checks for ENT_COMPAT, Phan baseline updates).
  • Adds a temporary eslint.config.mjs so we only lint the @wordpress/i18n-text-domain rule.
  • Adds a .phpcsignore to the package root so the synced blocks aren't auto-formatted by the pre-commit hook.

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

Testing instructions:

  • Make sure the changelog entry is adequate.
  • Verify ENT_COMPAT check catches as many appropriate matches as possible.
  • Ensure ./bin/sync-newspack-blocks.sh --release=v4.5.2 matches the checked-in files of this branch, with one ENT_COMPAT exception.

@tbradsha tbradsha requested a review from a team December 16, 2024 23:19
@tbradsha tbradsha self-assigned this Dec 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WordPress.com Simple site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin, and enable the update/synced_newspack_blocks branch.

    • For jetpack-mu-wpcom changes, also add define( 'JETPACK_MU_WPCOM_LOAD_VIA_BETA_PLUGIN', true ); to your wp-config.php file.
  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:

    bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack-mu-wpcom-plugin update/synced_newspack_blocks
    

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  • 🔴 Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Choose a review path based on your changes:
    • A. Team Review: add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label
      • For most changes, including minor cross-team impacts.
      • Example: Updating a team-specific component or a small change to a shared library.
    • B. Crew Review: add the "[Status] Needs Review" label
      • For significant changes to core functionality.
      • Example: Major updates to a shared library or complex features.
    • C. Both: Start with Team, then request Crew
      • For complex changes or when you need extra confidence.
      • Example: Refactor affecting multiple systems.
  3. Get at least one approval before merging.

Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!


Mu Wpcom plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: WordPress.com Simple releases happen semi-continuously (PCYsg-Jjm-p2).

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.


Wpcomsh plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: Atomic deploys happen twice daily on weekdays (p9o2xV-2EN-p2).

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.

@@ -61,7 +61,10 @@ then

if [[ "$CURRENT_VERSION" == "$NAME" ]]; then
echo "The current version $CURRENT_VERSION of the newspack-blocks is synced."
exit 0
read -rp "Do you want to proceed anyway? (y/N): " proceed
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you want you could source the file from the monorepo root tools/includes/proceed_p.sh to use our fancy function for doing prompts like this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any advantage of sourcing vs a simple read? :^)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The proceed_p function handles a bunch of edge cases. It doesn't matter a whole lot though. 🤷

projects/packages/jetpack-mu-wpcom/.phan/baseline.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 183 to 189
# Warn about the need to use ENT_COMPAT.
echo "Please ensure htmlentities and html_entity_decode use 'ENT_COMPAT'!"
ent_compat_needed=$(grep -rino 'html_entity_decode\|htmlentities' --include="$TARGET/*.php")
if [[ -n $ent_compat_needed ]]; then
echo 'Detected the below instances:'
echo "$ent_compat_needed"
fi
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Won't this be a bunch of noise, since it doesn't actually check if ENT_COMPAT is already in use?

Ideally we'd let PHPCompatibility.ParameterValues.NewHTMLEntitiesFlagsDefault detect it, but first they'd have to release a version of PHPCompatibility that contains that rule. 🙁

OTOH, will the .phpcsignore take care of ignoring that too during the CI run? Is that the only reason this is here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a bunch of noise

As far as I can see, it's only ever been one line to change, so I don't think it's too much noise. It's in there because the README said it was important to check for, and I figured it'd be helpful to point out places to check vs. assume the user knows what to look for. 🤷

will the .phpcsignore take care of ignoring that too during the CI run?

Yeah, the synced folder will be ignored by CI, so it's a manual fix we need to be aware of (though I'm open to alternatives).

That said, I wonder if this is an issue upstream too, at which point a patch there would remove the need to fix it here... 🤔

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, if it needs fixing, the fix really should be upstreamed.

The consequences of not fixing it are that behavior will differ depending on the PHP version, PHP <8.1 vs 8.1+.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Put in a PR upstream: Automattic/newspack-blocks#2010

Once that's merged, I'll remove that task from the script/README. :^)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed now instead of waiting: bc7ac12

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Docs label Dec 17, 2024
@tbradsha tbradsha requested a review from anomiex December 19, 2024 00:37
@github-actions github-actions bot added the [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! label Dec 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@anomiex anomiex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One issue, and one comment that I thought could use rewording. Otherwise looks reasonable to me.

I didn't review the synced code or the changes to the README.md.


# Warn about the need to use ENT_COMPAT.
echo "Please ensure htmlentities and html_entity_decode use 'ENT_COMPAT'!"
ent_compat_needed=$(grep -rino 'html_entity_decode\|htmlentities' --include="$TARGET/*.php")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't seem to work.

Suggested change
ent_compat_needed=$(grep -rino 'html_entity_decode\|htmlentities' --include="$TARGET/*.php")
ent_compat_needed=$(grep -rino 'html_entity_decode\|htmlentities' --include="*.php" "$TARGET")

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works for me:

--snip--

Please ensure htmlentities and html_entity_decode use 'ENT_COMPAT'!
Detected the below instances:
./src/features/newspack-blocks/synced-newspack-blocks/class-newspack-blocks.php:1104:html_entity_decode
./src/features/newspack-blocks/synced-newspack-blocks/class-newspack-blocks.php:1104:htmlentities

Sync done.

That said, it'll only detect files directly in said folder.

Either way, it should soon be a non-issue.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Upon further thought, no need to wait to remove this: bc7ac12

@tbradsha tbradsha requested a review from anomiex December 19, 2024 19:30
@tbradsha tbradsha merged commit 0e02080 into trunk Dec 19, 2024
56 checks passed
@tbradsha tbradsha deleted the update/synced_newspack_blocks branch December 19, 2024 20:49
@github-actions github-actions bot removed [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! [Status] Needs Team Review labels Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants