Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add nbgl tests workflow #822

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

tdejoigny-ledger
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.49%. Comparing base (98eaa57) to head (bd62ffd).
Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #822   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.49%   35.49%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        1606     1606           
=======================================
  Hits          570      570           
  Misses       1036     1036           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 35.49% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tdejoigny-ledger tdejoigny-ledger force-pushed the tdj/add_nbgl_tests branch 6 times, most recently from 54c7aee to fb8bf4e Compare November 13, 2024 22:03

jobs:
run_NBGL_tests:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it work more simply using something like:

jobs:
  run_NBGL_tests:
    uses: LedgerHQ/app-nbgl-tests/.github/workflows/build_and_functional_tests.yml@master
    with:
      golden_run: "Open a PR"
    secrets: inherit

🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes could be interesting if it's working and if the PR can be opened in the remote repository

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants