-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor changes #476
Minor changes #476
Conversation
remove comments on them
(in former versions administration was inherited via "Identifiable"
may also be idShort or any other fragment value + add xref
… qualifiers etc. added to overview of structure of document
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some new or changed xrefs had some bugs, which I have fixed and pushed the fix.
There are two open points that we should decide on. See comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about other occurrences in the spec? I have found 21 occurences of "I4.0 Component" in the docs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, really but hopefully only in the Annex
https://admin-shell-io.github.io/aas-specs-antora/IDTA-01001/v3.1/annex/concepts-aas.html
https://admin-shell-io.github.io/aas-specs-antora/IDTA-01001/v3.1/annex/requirements.html
https://admin-shell-io.github.io/aas-specs-antora/IDTA-01001/v3.1/annex/usage-metamodel.html#_composite_i4_0_components
Here it is more historic and would be ok. Only for Composite i4.0 components we need to rethink...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also remove numeration from other uml-basics PUML-files?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I was wrong, it is better without numbering
No description provided.