Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow num_replica to be undefined #125

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 31, 2023
Merged

Allow num_replica to be undefined #125

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 31, 2023

Conversation

brantburnett
Copy link
Owner

Motivation

Capella defaults num_replica to 1 while Couchbase Server defaults to 0.
Allowing num_replica to be undefined allows the user to use the default
for their environment.

Modifications

Allow num_replica to be undefined and don't send in the index create
or update query if it is undefined. Don't consider num_replica when
resizing existing indices if it is undefined.

Results

We are now more compatible with Capella behaviors. However, there is
still one remaining issue. Capella will ignore num_replica = 0 on
create and still create an index with one replica, causing the next
sync to resize to zero replicas. However, num_replica = undefined will
now behave consistently.

Motivation
----------
Capella defaults num_replica to 1 while Couchbase Server defaults to 0.
Allowing num_replica to be undefined allows the user to use the default
for their environment.

Modifications
-------------
Allow num_replica to be undefined and don't send in the index create
or update query if it is undefined. Don't consider num_replica when
resizing existing indices if it is undefined.

Results
-------
We are now more compatible with Capella behaviors. However, there is
still one remaining issue. Capella will ignore num_replica = 0 on
create and still create an index with one replica, causing the next
sync to resize to zero replicas. However, num_replica = undefined will
now behave consistently.
@brantburnett brantburnett merged commit 409efaf into main Dec 31, 2023
1 check passed
@brantburnett brantburnett deleted the num_replica branch December 31, 2023 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant