Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix pre.sh #22194

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

docs: fix pre.sh #22194

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt commented Oct 9, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the directory structure for module documentation, changing the base path for MODULE_DIRECTORY.
    • Continued support for copying various README files and documentation into the new structure.
    • Cleaned up the build environment by removing outdated or unnecessary files and directories.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Oct 9, 2024
@julienrbrt julienrbrt requested a review from tac0turtle as a code owner October 9, 2024 15:15
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the docs/pre.sh and docs/post.sh scripts to adjust the directory structure for module documentation and perform cleanup. In docs/pre.sh, the MODULE_DIRECTORY variable's path is changed from docs/build/modules/$DIR_NAME to build/modules/$DIR_NAME, affecting how directories are processed. The script retains its functionality to copy various README files and other documentation into the new structure. In docs/post.sh, several files and directories are removed to clean up the build environment.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/pre.sh Updated MODULE_DIRECTORY path from docs/build/modules/$DIR_NAME to build/modules/$DIR_NAME. Continued functionality to copy README and other documentation files into the new structure.
docs/post.sh Removed various markdown files and entire directories (build/tooling, build/packages, learn, build/architecture, build/spec, build/rfc) to clean up the build environment.

Suggested reviewers

  • akhilkumarpilli
  • sontrinh16

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between def2f8e and a9b2518.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/post.sh (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • docs/post.sh

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/pre.sh (1)

Line range hint 20-46: LGTM! Consider using variables for repeated paths.

The documentation copying section looks good and is consistent with the new build/ directory structure. All necessary documentation seems to be properly copied to their respective locations.

To improve maintainability, consider using variables for frequently used paths. For example:

BUILD_DIR="./build"
MODULES_DIR="${BUILD_DIR}/modules"
TOOLING_DIR="${BUILD_DIR}/tooling"
PACKAGES_DIR="${BUILD_DIR}/packages"

# Then use these variables in your copy commands
cp ../tools/cosmovisor/README.md "${TOOLING_DIR}/01-cosmovisor.md"
cp ../depinject/README.md "${PACKAGES_DIR}/01-depinject.md"
# ... and so on

This approach would make it easier to update paths in the future if needed.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3220aab and def2f8e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/pre.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/pre.sh (2)

Line range hint 20-21: Address TODO comment and consider adding error handling.

There's a TODO comment regarding the vesting submodule that references an issue:

## TODO to be removed in https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/issues/9958

Please check the status of this issue and consider addressing it if possible. Run the following script to verify the issue status:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the status of the referenced GitHub issue

gh issue view 9958 --repo cosmos/cosmos-sdk

Additionally, consider adding basic error handling and logging to the script. For example:

set -e  # Exit immediately if a command exits with a non-zero status
set -u  # Treat unset variables as an error

log_error() {
    echo "ERROR: $1" >&2
}

# Use this function for critical operations, e.g.:
# cp ../x/auth/vesting/README.md ./build/modules/auth/1-vesting.md || log_error "Failed to copy vesting README"

This will make the script more robust and easier to debug if issues arise.


10-10: Verify the intentionality of the documentation path change.

The MODULE_DIRECTORY path has been changed from docs/build/modules/$DIR_NAME to build/modules/$DIR_NAME. This modification alters the location where module documentation is generated.

Please confirm that this change is intentional and aligns with the project's documentation structure. Run the following script to check for any references to the old path that might need updating:

If this change is intentional, ensure that all related scripts, documentation, and build processes are updated accordingly to use the new path.

✅ Verification successful

Documentation path change verified.

All references to the old docs/build/modules path have been removed, and the new build/modules path is consistently used across the scripts.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references to the old docs/build/modules path

# Test: Search for references to the old path
rg --type-add 'script:*.{sh,bash}' --type script 'docs/build/modules'

# Test: Check if the new build/modules directory is referenced or used elsewhere
rg --type-add 'script:*.{sh,bash}' --type script 'build/modules'

Length of output: 1332

@akhilkumarpilli
Copy link
Contributor

akhilkumarpilli commented Oct 9, 2024

@julienrbrt do we need this line? We can remove it I guess

rm -rf learn/advaced-concepts/17-autocli.md

@julienrbrt julienrbrt enabled auto-merge October 9, 2024 16:31
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit fae85e0 Oct 9, 2024
74 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the julien/pre branch October 9, 2024 17:01
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2024
(cherry picked from commit fae85e0)
@mergify mergify bot mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2024
12 tasks
julienrbrt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants