-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pin dask to 2024.1.1 #1301
Pin dask to 2024.1.1 #1301
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1301 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.09% 85.47% +0.38%
==========================================
Files 77 77
Lines 4259 4242 -17
Branches 753 790 +37
==========================================
+ Hits 3624 3626 +2
+ Misses 466 448 -18
+ Partials 169 168 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Looks like we'll need to drop |
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ dependencies: | |||
- pytest-xdist | |||
- pytest | |||
- python=3.9 | |||
- py-xgboost=1.7.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Noting that we'll need to make a follow-up PR to dask-build-environment as this pinning will definitely conflict with the RAPIDS xgboost.
As part of large Dask pinning discussions, agreed with @pentschev @rjzamora that for now it makes sense to pin dask-sql to the same Dask dependency as RAPIDS, but not to fully invest in
rapids-dask-dependency
.